Students’ perceptions of an extensive blended learning implementation: the effects of instructional design and interaction

References

• Adinda, D., & Mohib, N. (2020). Teaching and instructional design approaches to enhance students’ learning in blended learning environments. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshehri, A. F. (2017). Student satisfaction and commitment towards a blended learning finance course: A new evidence from using the investment model. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamoallem, B., & Altarteer, S. (2021). Remote emergency learning during COVID-19 and its impact on university students perception of blended learning in KSA. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10660-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, M. W. (2022). Using blended project-based learning to teach project management to software engineering students. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.291978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, M. W., & Ferreira-Lopes, L. (2021). Emerging trends in telecollaboration and virtual exchange: A bibliometric study. Educational Review, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1907314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, M. W., & Rodrigues, C. A. (2020). Project portfolio management teaching: Contributions of a gamified approach. International Journal of Management Education, 18(2), 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. J., & Albert, M. (2016). Student perceptions of a flipped classroom management course. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(3), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2015-0069
   Google Scholar
• Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information and Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, V., & Kolsaker, A. (2015). Instructor approaches to blended learning: A tale of Two business schools. International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, Y., Selassie, H., & Parkin, E. (2012). Evaluation of a global blended learning MBA programme. International Journal of Management Education, 10(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Blaine, A. M. (2019). Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended advanced placement courses. Computers and Education, 132(December 2018), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(June), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boelens, R., Wever, B. D., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling in LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Erlbaum. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cal, L. F., Barbosa, M. W., & Gomes, R. R. (2019). Measuring participation in distance education online discussion forums using social network analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 70(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çardak, ÇS, & Selvi, K. (2016). Increasing teacher candidates’ ways of interaction and levels of learning through action research in a blended course. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 488–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, P., Van Gerven, T., Dubois, J.-L., & Bernaerts, K. (2021). Virtual chemical laboratories: A systematic literature review of research, technologies and instructional design. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100053
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. Y.-F., Wang, L. H., Lin, T. C., Cheng, F. C., & Chiang, C. P. (2021). Comparison of learning effectiveness between physical classroom and online learning for dental education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dental Sciences, 16(4), 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2020). Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of computers & education. Computers & Education, 151(September 2019), 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103855
   Google Scholar
• Chmiel, A. S., Shaha, M., & Schneider, D. K. (2017). Introduction of blended learning in a master program: Developing an integrative mixed method evaluation framework. Nurse Education Today, 48, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. J., Robb, C. A., Mifli, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2021). University students’ perception to online class delivery methods during the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on hospitality education in Korea and Malaysia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 29(August), 100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100336
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., Diep, A. N., De Greef, M., & Vanwing, T. (2019). Examining the role of learning support in blended learning for adults’ social inclusion and social capital. Computers and Education, 142(June), 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103610
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B., & Margaryan, A. (2005). Design criteria for work-based learning: Merrill’s first principles of instruction expanded. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00507.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysis. Computers & Education, 87, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., Vanwing, T., & de Greef, M. (2017). Effects of core self-evaluation and online interaction quality on adults’ learning performance and bonding and bridging social capital. Internet and Higher Education, 34, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikkers, A. G. (2015). The intersection of online and face-to-face teaching: Implications for virtual school teacher practice and professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2015.1038439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elangovan, N., & Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX, 8(March), 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments - significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. (2018). Effective practice instructional strategies: Design of an instrument to assess teachers’ perception of implementation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (S. P. Inc. (ed.); Second Edi).
   Google Scholar
• Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development. Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00295-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, W., Holton, A. J., & Farkas, G. (2018). Impact of partially flipped instruction on immediate and subsequent course performance in a large undergraduate chemistry course. Computers & Education, 125, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, R. A., de Jong, P. G. M., Admiraal, W. F., & Reinders, M. E. J. (2020). Instructional design quality in medical massive open online courses for integration into campus education. Medical Teacher, 42(2), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1665634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M. L., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers and Education, 81, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernández-García, Á, Chaparro-Peláez, J., & Prieto, J. L. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119(January), 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson-barlow, E. M., & Lehnen, C. (2021). A scoping review of the application of systematic instructional design models by academic librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, E., Kim, D., Yoon, M., Park, S., & Oakley, B. (2019). The influence of instructional design on learner control, sense of achievement, and perceived effectiveness in a supersize MOOC course. Computers & Education, 128, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Krishnamurthi, R., Bhatia, S., Kaushik, K., Ahuja, N. J., Nayyar, A., & Masud, M. (2021). Blended learning tools and practices: A comprehensive analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 85151–85197. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H., Hsiao, Y., & Hsieh, P. (2018). The role of motivation, ability, and opportunity in university teachers’ continuance use intention for flipped teaching. Computers & Education, 124(September), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.013
   Google Scholar
• Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having Two watches: Assessment of Fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35(May 2020), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, J., Reuge, N., & Benavides, F. (2021). UNICEF’s lessons learned from the education response to the COVID-19 crisis and reflections on the implications for education policy. International Journal of Educational Development, 85(December 2020), 102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leslie, H. J., & Leslie, H. J. (2019). Trifecta of student engagement: A framework for an online teaching faculty in higher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2018-0024
   Google Scholar
• Longo, L., & Orrú, G. (2022). Evaluating instructional designs with mental workload assessments in university classrooms. Behaviour and Information Technology, 41(6), 1199–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1864019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1397–1408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic? International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manwaring, K. C., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. Internet and Higher Education, 35(July), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennet, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-Fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time With an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34(April), 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
   Google Scholar
• Müller, F. A., & Wulf, T. (2021). Blended learning environments that work: An evidence-based instructional design for the delivery of qualitative management modules. International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naaj, M. A., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of Information Technology Education:Research, 11(1), 185–200. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84877670205&partnerID=40&md5=d93a500ba62ac67aa0948e9a26c5f85d https://doi.org/10.28945/1692
   Google Scholar
• O’ Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owston, R., & York, D. N. (2018). The nagging question when designing blended courses: Does the proportion of time devoted to online activities matter? The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y., Yu, J. H., & Jo, I.-H. (2016). Clustering blended learning courses by online behavior data: A case study in a Korean higher education institute. Internet and Higher Education, 29(April), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Bodily, R. G., & Sandberg, D. S. (2016). A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 28, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posey, L., & Pintz, C. (2017). Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: Successes, challenges and outcomes. Nurse Education in Practice, 26, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Escolar-llamazares, M.-C., & Arnaiz, GÁ. (2020). Effectiveness of blended learning in nursing education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, G. (2013). PLS Path Modeling with R (T. Editions (ed.)). http://www.gastonsanchez.com/PLS Path Modeling with R.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-Online, 8(2), 23–74. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-08119-003
   Google Scholar
• Schott, F., & Seel, N. M. (2015). Instructional design. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed. Vol. 11, pp. 196–200). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92032-4
   Google Scholar
• Secundo, G., Mele, G., del Vecchio, P., Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Ndou, V. (2021). Threat or opportunity? A case study of digital-enabled redesign of entrepreneurship education in the COVID-19 emergency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif, A., & Gisbert, M. (2015). The impact of culture on instructional design and quality. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.8111a
   Google Scholar
• Shi, M. (2019). The effects of class size and instructional technology on student learning performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, H., & Gu, X. (2018). Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student–group interactions in a blended learning course. Internet and Higher Education, 39(November 2017), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Spanjers, I. A. E., Könings, K. D., Leppink, J., Verstegen, D. M. L., Jong, N. D., & Czabanowska, K. (2015). The promised land of blended learning: Quizzes as a moderator. Educational Research Review, 15, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauß, S., & Rummel, N. (2020). Promoting interaction in online distance education: Designing, implementing and supporting collaborative learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tso, A. W. B. (2015). Reflections on blended learning: A case study at the open university of Hong Kong. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 10(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-01-2015-B008
   Google Scholar
• Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Lombaerts, K., Philipsen, B., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Students’ motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Lee, Y., Lin, L., Mi, Y., & Yang, T. (2021). Analyzing instructional design quality and students ‘ reviews of 18 courses out of the class central Top 20 MOOCs through systematic and sentiment analyses. The Internet and Higher Education, 50(January 2020), 100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100810
   Google Scholar
• Wisneski, J. E., Ozogul, G., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2015). Does teaching presence transfer between MBA teaching environments? A comparative investigation of instructional design practices associated with teaching presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness. Education and Training, 56(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049
   Google Scholar
• Yamada, J., Stevens, B., Sidani, S., Watt-Watson, J., & De Silva, N. (2010). Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 7(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00182.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharis, N. Z. (2015). A multivariate approach to predicting student outcomes in web-enabled blended learning courses. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar