Defining the Content of Sustainability Reports in Nonprofit Organizations: Do Stakeholders Really Matter?

REFERENCES

• ACCA . 2005 . Improving stakeholder engagement reporting: An ACCA and the environment council workshop , London , UK : Certified Accountants Educational Trust .
   Google Scholar
• AccountAbility . 1999 . “ AccountAbility ” . In AA1000 framework London , UK
   Google Scholar
• AccountAbility . 2003 . AA1000 assurance standard. London, UK: AccountAbility
   Google Scholar
• AccountAbility . 2005 . Stakeholder engagement standard , London , UK : AccountAbility .
   Google Scholar
• Andriof , J. and Waddock , S. 2002 . “ Unfolding stakeholder engagement ” . In Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement , Edited by: Andriof , J. , Waddock , S. , Husted , B. and Rahman , S. 19 – 42 . Sheffield , UK : Greenleaf Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Andriof , J. , Waddock , S. , Husted , B. and Rahman , S. 2002 . Unfolding stakeholder thinking: theory, responsibility and engagement , Sheffield , UK : Greenleaf Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Antonacopoulou , E. P. and Meric , J. 2005 . A critique of stakeholder theory: Management science or a sophisticated ideology of control? . Corporate Governance , 5 ( 2 ) : 22 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Bagnoli , L. and Megali , C. 2011 . Measuring performances in social enterprises . Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 40 ( 1 ) : 149 – 165 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington , J. , Brown , J. , Frame , B. and Thomson , I. 2007 . Theorizing engagement: The potential of a critical dialogic approach . Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal , 20 ( 3 ) : 356 – 381 .
   Google Scholar
• Bendell , J. 2005 . In whose name? The accountability of corporate social responsibility . Development in Practice , 15(3/4) : 362 – 374 .
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin , L. M. 2008 . Account space: How accountability requirements shape nonprofit practice . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 37 ( 2 ) : 201 – 223 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman , S. L. , Wicks , A. C. , Kotha , S. and Jones , T. M. 1999 . Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance . Academy of Management Journal , 42 ( 5 ) : 488 – 506 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagescu , M. , De Las Casas , L. and Lloyd , R. 2005 . Pathways to accountability: A short guide to the GAP framework , London , UK : One World Trust .
   Google Scholar
• Campbell , D. 2003 . Intra- and inter-sectorial effects in environmental disclosures: Evidence for legitimacy theory? . Business Strategy and the Environment , 12 ( 6 ) : 357 – 371 .
   Google Scholar
• Carroll , A. B. 1996 . Business and society—Ethics and stakeholder management , Cincinnati , OH : South-Western Publishing Co .
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson , M.B.E. 1995 . A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance . Academy of Management Journal , 20 ( 1 ) : 92 – 118 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier , P. M. 2008 . Stakeholder accountability: A field study of the implementation of a governance improvement plan . Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , 21 ( 7 ) : 933 – 954 .
   Google Scholar
• Costa , E. , Ramus , T. and Andreaus , M. 2011 . Accountability as a managerial tool in non-profit organizations: Evidence from Italian CSVs . Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , 22 ( 3 ) : 470 – 493 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart , R. 2004 . The legitimacy of social enterprise . Nonprofit Management and Leadership , 14 ( 4 ) : 411 – 424 .
   Google Scholar
• Dawson , I. and Dunn , A. 2006 . Governance codes of practice in the not-for-profit sector . Corporate Governance , 14 ( 1 ) : 33 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon , R. , Ritchie , J. and Siwale , J. 2006 . Microfinance: Accountability from the grassroots . Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , 19 ( 3 ) : 405 – 427 .
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson , T. and Preston , L. E. 1995 . The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications . Academy of Management Review , 20 ( 1 ) : 65 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey , P. R. 2002 . The essential stakeholder dialogue . Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 9 ( 1 ) : 37 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim , A. 2003a . Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGO's . World Development , 31 ( 5 ) : 813 – 829 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim , A. 2003b . Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits . Nonprofit Management and Leadership , 14 ( 2 ) : 191 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim , A. 2005 . Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 34 ( 1 ) : 56 – 87 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgley , C. R. , Jones , M. J. and Solomon , J. F. 2010 . Stakeholder inclusivity in social and environmental report assurance . Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal , 23 ( 4 ) : 532 – 557 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evan , W. and Freeman , R. 1988 . “ A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism ” . In Ethical theory and business , Edited by: Beauchamp , T. and Bowie , N. 101 – 105 . Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Freeman , R. E. 1984 . Strategic management: A stakeholder approach , Boston , MA : Pitman .
   Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) . (2006) . Sustainability reporting guidelines: G3 version , Amsterdam , Netherlands : GRI .
   Google Scholar
• Gray , R. 2000 . Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: A review and comment . International Journal of Auditing , 4 ( 3 ) : 247 – 268 .
   Google Scholar
• Gray , R. 2002 . The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society: Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? . Accounting Organizations and Society , 27 ( 7 ) : 687 – 708 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray , R. , Bebbington , J. and Collison , D. 2006 . NGOs, civil society and accountability: Making the people accountable to capital . Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , 19 ( 3 ) : 319 – 348 .
   Google Scholar
• Gray , R. H. , Owen , D. L. and Adams , C. 1996 . Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting , London , UK : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Greenley , G. E. and Foxall , G. R. 1997 . Multiple stakeholder orientation in UK companies and the implication for company performance . Journal of Management Studies , 34 ( 2 ) : 259 – 283 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie , J. , Petty , R. , Yongvanich , K. and Ricceri , F. 2004 . Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting . Journal of Intellectual Capital , 5 ( 2 ) : 282 – 293 .
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann , H. B. 1980 . The role of non-profit enterprise . The Yale Law Journal , 89 ( 5 ) : 835 – 901 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill , C.W.L. and Jones , T. H. 1992 . Stakeholder-agency theory . Journal of Management Studies , 29 ( 2 ) : 131 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti , O. R. 1969 . Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities , Reading , MA : Addison-Wesley .
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G.2009Unsustainable reporting. Unpublished results, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.corporateregister.com/crra/2008-ceremony/research.html (http://www.corporateregister.com/crra/2008-ceremony/research.html)
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs , A. 2006 . “ Helping people is difficult: Growth and performance in social enterprises working for international relief and development ” . In Social entrepreneurship: New paradigms of sustainable social change , Edited by: Nicholls , A. 247 – 270 . Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , T. M. , Wicks , A. C. and Freeman , R. E. 2002 . “ Stakeholder theory: The state of the art ” . In The Blackwell guide to business ethics , Edited by: Bowie , N. E. 19 – 37 . Oxford , UK : Blackwell Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Kendall , J. and Knapp , M. 1996 . The voluntary sector in the UK , Manchester , UK : Manchester University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kendall , J. and Knapp , M. 2000 . Measuring the performance of voluntary organizations . Public Management , 2 ( 1 ) : 105 – 132 .
   Google Scholar
• Knox , S. and Gruar , C. 2007 . The application of stakeholder theory to relationship marketing strategy development in a non-profit organization . Journal of Business Ethics , 75 ( 2 ) : 115 – 135 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff , K. 1980 . Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology , Beverly Hills , CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , M. 2004 . Public reporting: A neglected aspect of nonprofit accountability . Nonprofit Management & Leadership , 15 ( 2 ) : 169 – 185 .
   Google Scholar
• Lyons , M. 2001 . “ St. Leonards ” . In Third sector: The contribution of non-profit and co-operative enterprises in Australia , Australia : Allen and Unwin .
   Google Scholar
• Manetti , G. 2011 . The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence and critical points . Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 18 ( 2 ) : 110 – 122 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo , E. 1996 . Social auditing for voluntary organizations , London , UK : VOLPROF, Centre for Voluntary Sector and Not-for-Profit-Management .
   Google Scholar
• Middlewood , D. and Cardno , C. 2001 . Managing teacher appraisal and performance: A comparative approach , London , UK : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Miles , S. , Hammond , K. and Friedman , A. L. 2002 . ACCA research report no. 77: Social and environmental reporting and ethical investment , London , UK : Certified Accountants Educational Trust .
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell , R. K. , Agle , B. R. and Wood , D. J. 1997 . Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts . Academy of Management Review , 22 ( 4 ) : 853 – 886 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar , M. 2008 . The accountability paradigm: Standards of excellence: Theory and research evidence from Hungary . Public Management Review , 10 ( 1 ) : 127 – 137 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan , R. 2000 . Accountability: An ever-expanding concept? . Public Administration , 78 ( 3 ) : 555 – 573 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtaza , N. 2012 . Putting the lasts first: The case for community-focused and peer-managed NGO accountability mechanisms . Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , 23 ( 1 ) : 109 – 125 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussari , R. and Monfardini , P. 2010 . Practices of social reporting in public sector and non-profit organizations: An Italian perspective . Public Management Review , 12 ( 4 ) : 487 – 492 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najam , A. 1996 . NGO accountability: A conceptual framework . Development Policy Review , 14 : 339 – 353 .
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf , K. A. 2002 . The content analysis guidebook , Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls , A. 2009 . We do good things, don't we?: ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in social entrepreneurship . Accounting, Organizations and Society , 34 ( 6–7 ) : 755 – 769 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer , B. 2002 . Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story . Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , 15 ( 3 ) : 406 – 436 .
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer , B. 2005 . The construction of a social account: A case study in an overseas aid agency . Accounting, Organizations and Society , 30 ( 3 ) : 279 – 296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer , B. and Unerman , J. 2007 . From functional to social accountability: Transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organizations . Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , 20 ( 3 ) : 446 – 471 .
   Google Scholar
• Owen , D. , Swift , T. and Hunt , K. 2001 . Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting . Accounting Forum , 25 ( 3 ) : 264 – 282 .
   Google Scholar
• Paton , R. 2003 . Managing and measuring social enterprises , London , UK : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Phillips , R. 1997 . Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness . Business Ethics Quarterly , 7 ( 1 ) : 51 – 66 .
   Google Scholar
• Roberts , W. R. 1992 . Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory . Accounting, Organizations and Society , 17 ( 6 ) : 595 – 612 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley , T. J. 1997 . Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences . Academy of Management Review , 22 ( 4 ) : 887 – 910 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon , L. M. and Anheier , H. K. 1997 . Defining the non profit sector: A cross national analysis , Manchester , UK : Manchester University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Simmons , J. A. 2004 . Reconciling effectiveness and equity in performance management, a stakeholder synthesis approach to organisation systems design . Systemic Practice and Action Research , 16 ( 5 ) : 355 – 365 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence , C. and Gray , R. 2007 . Social and environmental reporting and the business case , London , UK : Certified Accountants Educational Trust .
   Google Scholar
• Suchman , M. 1995 . Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches . Academy of Management Review , 20 ( 3 ) : 517 – 610 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen , A. 1998 . The stakeholder strategy: Profiting from collaborative business relationships , San Francisco CA : Berett-Koehler .
   Google Scholar
• Swift , T. 2001 . Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders . Business Ethics: A European Review , 10 ( 1 ) : 16 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• UNEP & SustainAbility . 1999 . The social reporting report , London , UK : SustainAbility .
   Google Scholar
• Unerman , J. and Bennett , M. 2004 . Increased stakeholder dialogue and the Internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? . Accounting, Organizations and Society , 29 ( 7 ) : 685 – 707 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unerman , J. and O'Dwyer , B. 2006 . Theorising accountability for NGO advocacy . Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , 19 ( 3 ) : 349 – 376 .
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs . 2003 . Handbook on non-profit institutions in the system of national accounts , New York , NY : United Nations. .
   Google Scholar
• Voss , Z. G. , Voss , G. B. and Moorman , C. 2005 . An empirical examination of the complex relationships between entrepreneurial orientation and stakeholder support . European Journal of Marketing , 39(9/10) : 1132 – 1150 .
   Google Scholar
• Waddock , S. A. 2002 . Leading corporate citizens: Vision, values, value added , Boston , MA : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Weber , R. P. 1990 . Basic content analysis , 2nd , Newbury Park , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Wellens , L. and Jegers , M. 2013 . Effective governance in nonprofit organizations: A literature based multiple stakeholder approach. European Management Journal doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Wicks , A. C. and Goodstein , J. D. 2009 . Stakeholder responsibility and stakeholder commitment . Notizie di Politeia , 93 : 9 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Windsor , D. 2002 . “ Stakeholder responsibilities: Lessons for managers ” . In Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement , Edited by: Andriof , J. , Waddock , S. , Husted , B. and Rahman , S. 137 – 154 . Sheffield , UK : Greenleaf Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Woodward , S. and Marshall , S. 2004 . The more the merrier: Stakeholders in not-for-profit companies . Third Sector Review , 10 ( 1 ) : 101 – 128 .
   Google Scholar