Service-Dominant Logic and Nonprofit Organizations: A Value Creation Perspective

References

• Adelino, M., Lewellen, K., & Sundaram, A. (2015). Investment decisions of nonprofit firms: Evidence from hospitals. The Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1583–1628. doi:10.1111/jofi.2015.70.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A. M., Eilert, M., & Peloza, J. (2018). How deviations from performance norms impact charitable donations. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(2), 277–290. doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 571–588. doi:10.1080/14783360601074315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. K., & Seibel, W. (Eds.). (2013). The third sector: Comparative studies of nonprofit organizations (Vol. 21). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2003). A construção social da realidade: Tratado sobre a sociologia do conhecimento [The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge]. Petrópolis: Vozes.
   Google Scholar
• Cabral, E. H. D. S. (2017). TERCEIRO SETOR-Gestão e controle social. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva.
   Google Scholar
• Chetkovich, C., & Frumkin, P. (2003). Balancing margin and mission: Nonprofit competition in charitable versus fee-based programs. Administration and Society, 35(5), 564–596. doi:10.1177/0095399703256162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2002). Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 445–456. doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Domenico, S. M. R., & Teixeira, M. L. M. (2014). Valores relativos à competição organizacional e ação comunicativa: Um novo olhar sobre o fazer organizacional. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 12, 442–468. doi:10.1590/1679-39519330
   Google Scholar
• De los Mozos, I. S. L., Duarte, A. R., & Ruiz, Ó. R. (2016). Resource dependence in non-profit organizations: Is it harder to fundraise if you diversify your revenue structure?. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(6), 2641–2665.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: INSTITUTIONAL ISOMORPfflSM AND COLLECTIVE RATIONALITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL EIELDS *. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drollinger, T. (2010). A theoretical examination of giving and volunteering utilizing resource exchange theory. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22(1), 55–66. doi:10.1080/10495140903190416
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (2012). Managing the non-profit organization. US: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., Raggio, R. D., & Thompson, S. M. (2016). Service network value co-creation: Defining the roles of the generic actor. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 51–62. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. J., & Yuthas, K. (2017). Measuring and improving social impacts: A guide for nonprofits, companies and impact investors. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fajardo, T. M., Townsend, C., & Bolander, W. (2018). Toward an optimal donation solicitation: Evidence from the field of the differential influence of donor-related and organization-related information on donation choice and amount. Journal of Marketing, 82(2), 142–152. doi:10.1509/jm.15.0511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. R., & Andre-Clark, A. (2000). When missions, markets, and politics collide: Values and strategy in nonprofit human services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 141–164. doi:10.1177/0899764000291S007
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society (1st ed.). Cambridge: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gnyawali, D. R., Madhavan, R., He, J., & Bengtsson, M. (2016). The competition–cooperation paradox in inter-firm relationships: A conceptual framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 7–18. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901. doi:10.2307/796089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, N. N., Wieland, H., Bay, M., & Vargo, S. L. (2018, March). Converging on a new theoretical foundation for selling. Journal of Marketing, 82, 1–18. doi:10.1509/jm.16.0268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes an integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 230–247. doi:10.1177/1094670502004003006
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert, S., Horne, S., Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., Sánchez-García, I., Guy, B. S., & Patton, W. E. (1989). The marketing of altruistic causes: Understanding why people help. Journal of Services Marketing Iss Journal of Consumer Marketing Iss Journal of Consumer Marketing Journal of Product & Brand Management, 2(6), 5–16. doi:10.1108/eb024711%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002536%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363769610115366%0Ahttp://
   Google Scholar
• Hlady‐Rispal, M., & Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing the way in which value is created in the context of social entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 62–80. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2018.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. D. (2000). A general theory of competition: Resources, competences, productivity, economic growth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzgun, E., & Asugman, G. (2015). Value in services – A service dominant logic perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 242–251. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.093
   Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic. What it is, what it is not, what it might be. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139043120
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowles, C. (2007). Promises of transformation: Just how different are international development NGOs?. Journal of international development: The journal of the development studies association, 19(3), 401–411.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS). (2018). Retrieved from https://nccs.urban.org/publication/nonprofit-sector-brief-2018
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606892.012
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. doi:10.1002/dir.20015
   Google Scholar
• Reid, M. F., Brown, L., McNerney, D., & J. Perri, D. (2014). Time to raise the bar on nonprofit strategic planning and implementation. Strategy & Leadership, 42(3), 31–39. doi:10.1108/SL-03-2014-0019
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A. (2001). Using donor lifetime value to inform fundraising strategy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(1), 25–38. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, A. (2015). philanthropy as political liquidation. Society, 52(6), 580–584. doi:10.1007/s12115-015-9952-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, measures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 42, 249–288.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., … & Dirilen-Gumus, O. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. doi:10.1037/a0029393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Crafting an analytic framework I. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 1, 47–71. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(97)89895-7
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (2000). Bounded rationality in social science: Today and tomorrow. Mind and Society, 1, 25–39. doi:10.1007/BF02512227
   Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., & Cryder, C. (2016). Prosocial consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 107–111. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, A. L., & Bell, N. (2014). Motivation for alumni donations: A social identity perspective on the role of branding in higher education. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19(3), 176–186. doi:10.1002/nvsm.v19.3
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1981). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, S. J., & Lawson, R. W. (1999). Towards a better understanding of the financial donor: An examination of donor behaviour in terms of value structure and demographics. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 4(3), 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Topaloglu, O., McDonald, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. (2018). The theoretical foundations of nonprofit competition: A resource-advantage theory approach. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(3), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigilia, C. (2001). Social capital and local development. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), 427–442. doi:10.1177/13684310122225244
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 36, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. L. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstraete, T., & Jouison-Laffitte, E. (2011a). A conventionalist theory of the business model in the context of business creation for understanding organizational impetus. Management International, 15, 109–124. doi:10.7202/1003453ar
   Google Scholar
• Vesterlund, L. (2006). Why do people give. In The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 168–190). US: Yale Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism ( (Parsons, trans.)). New York, NY: Scribner. (Original work published 1904–1905).
   Google Scholar
• Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Designing your future business model: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43, 216–226. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar