References
- Achleitner, A., Spiess-Knafl, W., & Volk, S. (2014). The financing structure of social enterprises: conflicts and implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 6(1), 85-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2014.059404
- Alegre, I. (2015). Social and economic tension in social enterprises: Does it exist? Social Business, 5(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1362/204440815X14267607784767
- Altman, M. (2016). Is there a co-operative advantage? Experimental evidence on the economic and non-economic determinants of demand. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 4(2), 66–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2016.08.003
- Andersson, F. O., & Self, W. (2014). The Social-Entrepreneurship Advantage: An Experimental Study of Social Entrepreneurship and Perceptions of Nonprofit Effectiveness. Voluntas 26, 2718–2732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9543-1
- Andorfer, V. A., & Otte, G. (2013). Do contexts matter for willingness to donate to natural disaster relief? An application of the factorial survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 657–688. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012440180
- Andreoni, J., & Payne, A. A. (2011). Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 334-343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.011
- Asioli, D., Næs, T., Øvrum, A., & Almli, V. L. (2016). Comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models. A case study based on preferences for iced coffee in Norway. Food Quality and Preference, 48(Part A), 174–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.007
- Barrett, W.P., & Alexander, D. (2015, December). America’s largest charities. Forbes, 196(9), 26. Retrieved from www.Forbes.com
- Bates, M. J. (2015). Why business as mission entrepreneurs decided to go into business. Business Journal for Entrepreneurs, (2015 (1), 78–107. http://www.franklinpublishing.net/businessentrepreneurs.html
- Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011a). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
- Brimble, M., Vyvyan, V., & Ng, C. (2013). Belief and Investing: Preferences and Attitudes of the Faithful. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 7(1), 23-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v7i1.3
- Calabrese, T. D. (2011). Do donors penalize nonprofit organizations with accumulated wealth? Public Administration Review, 71(6), 859–869. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02420.x
- Carabain, C. L., & Bekkers, R. (2011). Explaining differences in philanthropic behavior between Christians, Muslims, and Hindus in the Netherlands. Review of Religious Research, 53(4), 419–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-011-0018-1
- Castillo, Petrie, R., & Wardell, C. (2014). Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 29-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.002
- Chapman, C. (2013). 9 things clients get wrong about conjoint analysis. In B. Orme, ed Proceedings of the 2013 sawtooth software conference, Dana Points, CA, October. https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/41886.pdf
- Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001
- Chrzan, K., & Orme, B. (2000). An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series 1-19. Retrieved from https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/desgncbc.pdf
- Collins, Hoxie, & Flannery. (2018). Gilded giving: Top-heavy philanthropy and its perils to the independent sector and democracy. Institute for Policy Studies, 1-36. https://ips-dc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Gilded-Giving-November-2018-FINAL.pdfhttps://ips-dc.org/report-gilded-giving-2018/
- Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
- Elder, A., & Pan, T. (2009). Survey quality and MaxDiff: An assessment of who fails, and why. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference, 55–82. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/support/technical-papers/conference-proceedings/proceedings2009
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Feiler, S., Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2015). How to raise voluntary giving for nonprofit sports clubs: An analysis of factors influencing donations. Voluntas, 26(4), 1219–1239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9489-3
- Frumkin, P. (2008). Strategic giving: The art and science of philanthropy. University of Chicago Press.
- Frumkin, P., & Kim, M. (2001). Strategic positioning and the financing of nonprofit organizations: Is efficiency rewarded in the contributions marketplace? Public Administration Review, 61(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00029
- Giving-USA. (2018). Giving USA 2018 report highlights. Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.
- Glänzel, G., & Scheuerle, T. (2016). Social Impact Investing in Germany: Current Impediments from Investors’ and Social Entrepreneurs’ Perspectives.Voluntas 27,1638–1668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9621-z
- Grizzle, C. (2015). Efficiency, stability and the decision to give to nonprofit arts and cultural organizations in the United States. International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1521
- Hainmueller, Hangartner, & Yamamoto. (2015). Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(8), 2395–2400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112
- Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22, 1-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024
- Hales, J., Kuang, X . I., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Who believes the hype? An experimental examination of how language affects investor judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(1), 223-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00394.x
- Hands, D. W. (2017). The road to rationalisation: A history of “where the empirical lives” (or has lived in consumer choice theory. History of Economic Thought, 24(3), 555–588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2016.1260148
- Helms, S. E., & Thornton, J. P. (2012). The influence of religiosity on charitable behavior: A COPPS investigation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(4), 373–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2012.04.003
- Herman, R. D., & Rendina, D. (2001). Donor reactions to commercial activities of nonprofit organizations: An American case study. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, 12(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011238719394
- Herzer, D., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2013). Private donations, government grants, commercial activities, and fundraising: Cointegration and causality for NGOs in international development cooperation. World Development, 46, 234–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.010
- Heyes, A., & Martin, S. (2015). NGO mission design. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 119, 197–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.08.007
- Jansson, M., & Biel, A. (2011). Motives to engage in sustainable investment: A comparison between institutional and private investors. Sustainable Development, 19(2), 135-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.512
- Kickul, J., & Lyons, T. S. (2015). Financing social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2),83-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0006
- Kinsbergen, S., & Tolsma, J. (2013). Explaining monetary donations to international development organisations: A factorial survey approach. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1571–1586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.06.011
- Ko, S. (2012). Viability of social enterprises: the spillover effect. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(3), 251-263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211280782
- Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
- Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., & Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 693–714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9398-4
- Luke, B., & Chu, V. (2013). Social enterprise versus social entrepreneurship: An examination of the ‘why’ and ‘how’ in pursuing social change. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 764–784. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612462598
- Luo, X., Warkentin, M., & Li, H. (2013). Understanding technology adoption trade-offs: A conjoint analysis approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53 (3), 65–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645633.
- Lyons, T. S., & Kickul, J. R. (2013). The Social Enterprise Financing Landscape: The Lay of the Land and New Research on the Horizon. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 3(2), 147-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0045
- Manzini, P., Mariotti, M., & Tyson, C. J. (2016). Partial knowledge restriction on the two-stage threshold model of choice. Journal of Mathematics, 64, 41–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.03.003
- Marudas, N. P., Hahn, T., & Jacobs, F. A. (2012). An improved model of donations to nonprofit organizations [Paper presented]. ASBBS Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV. http://asbbs.org/files/ASBBS2012V1/PDF/M/MarudasN.pdf
- Marudas, N. P., Hahn, T., & Jacobs, F. A. (2014). An improved model of effects of accounting measures of inefficiency on donations. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 15, 1–15. http://www.aabri.com/jfa.html
- McKay, S., Moro, D., Teasdale, S., & Clifford, D. (2014). The marketisation of charities in England and Wales. Voluntas, 26(1), 336–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9417-y
- Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for Others with Heart and Head: How Compassion Encourages Social Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616-640. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0456
- Minello, I. F., Alves Scherer, L., & da Costa Alves, L. (2014). Entrepreneurial competencies and business failure. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18, 1–15. http://www.alliedacademies.org/journals.php?jid=7
- Okten, C., & Weisbrod, B. A. (2000). Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics, 75(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00066-3
- Orme, B. (2010). Interpreting the results of conjoint analysis. In B. Orme (Ed.), Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research (2ed ed.), 77–88. Research Publishers LLC. https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/support/technical-papers/general-conjoint-analysis/interpreting-conjoint-analysis-data-2009.
- Orme, B. (2014). Getting started with conjoint analysis. Manhattan Beach, CA: Research Publishers.
- Popović, M., Kuzmanović, M., & Martić, M. (2012). Using conjoint analysis to elicit employers’ preferences toward key competencies for a business manager position. Management (1820-0222), 17(63), 17–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2012.0011
- Ridley-Duff, R., & Southcombe, C. (2012). The social enterprise mark: A critical review of its conceptual dimensions. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(3), 178–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211280746
- Riley, T. J., Semin, G. R., & Yen, A. C. (2014). Patterns of language use in accounting narratives and their impact on investment-related judgments and decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26(1), 59-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-50624
- Sawtooth-Software. (2013). The CBC system for choice-based conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series, 1–27. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/cbctech.pdf
- Saxton, G. D., Neely, D. G., & Guo, C. (2014). Web disclosure and the market for charitable contributions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.12.003
- Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485159
- Smith, B. R., Cronley, M. L., & Barr, T. F. (2012). Funding implications of social enterprise: The role of mission consistency, entrepreneurial competence, and attitude toward social enterprise on donor behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.11.033
- Urban, B., & Stacey, A. (2015). Preferred attributes of entrepreneurial opportunities: A conjoint and cluster analysis study. South African Journal of Business Management, 46 (1), 83–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v46i1.85.
- Van Hulle, C., & Dewaelheyns, N. (2014). Why do private non-profit organizations provide information on the Internet? Social Enterprise Journal, 10(1), 69-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2012-0047
- Weisbrod, B. A., & Dominguez, N. D. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior? Journal of Public Economics, 30(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(86)90078-2
- Wicker, P., Breuer, C., & Hennigs, B. (2012). Understanding the interactions among revenue categories using elasticity measures—Evidence from a longitudinal sample of non-profit sport clubs in Germany. Sport Management Review, 15(3), 318–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2011.12.004
- Young, D. R., & Lecy, J. D. (2014). Defining the universe of social enterprise: Competing metaphors. Voluntas, 25(5), 1307–1332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9396-z