Improving Relationship Quality with Stakeholders to Increase Nonprofit Organizations’ Impact: The Mediating Role of Students’ Contributions

References

• Albareda, L. (2008). Corporate responsibility, governance and accountability: From self-regulation to co-regulation. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8(4), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810899176
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., Brudney, J. L., & Kaifeng, Y. (2010). Introduction to the symposium: accountability and performance measurement: The evolving role of nonprofits in the Hollow State. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010369662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amagoh, F. (2015). Improving the credibility and effectiveness of non-governmental organizations. Progress in Development Studies, 15(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993415578979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshad, R., Razak, H. A., & Bakar, N. A. (2014). Assessing the self-governance and value creation in non-profit organisations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145 (2014) , 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.036
   Google Scholar
• Ayuso, S., Sánchez, P., Retolaza, J. L., & Figueras-Maz, M. (2020). Social value analysis: The case of Pompeu Fabra University. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2018-0307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balabanis, G., Stables, R. E., & Phillips, H. C. (1997). Market orientation in the top 200 British charity organizations and its impact on their performance. European Journal of Marketing, 31(8), 583–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569710176592
   Google Scholar
• Baur, D., & Schmitz, H. P. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1057-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazin, C., Duros, M., Legrand, F., Prevostat, G., & Malet, J. (2018). La France Associative en mouvement—16ème édition. Recherches & Solidarités.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A., Boenigk, S., & Willems, J. (2020). In nonprofits we trust? A large-scale study on the public’s trust in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 32(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1707744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. (1998). Market orientation among small to medium sized UK charitable organisations: Implications for fund-raising performance. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 6(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v06n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Blevins, D. P., Ragozzino, R., & Eckardt, R. (2020). “Corporate governance” and performance in nonprofit organizations. Strategic Organization, 1476127020921253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020921253
   Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, B. (2003). Investing in capacity building: A guide to high-impact approaches. Foundation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Boenigk, S., & Möhlmann, M. (2016). A public sector marketing model to measure the social and environmental values of public strategies: An empirical study on a green public service. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 28(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2014.987036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, M. (2004). Vers une évaluation multidimensionnelle et négociée de l’économie sociale. Recma : Revue Internationale de L’économie Sociale, 292(292), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.7202/1022107ar
   Google Scholar
• Bruni-Bossio, V., Story, D. C., & Garcea, J. (2016). Board governance in the nonprofit sector: Role-performance relationships of directors. The Innovation Journal, 21(1), 1 https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/2016_21_1_3_bruni-bossio_story_role-performance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bucolo, E., Eynaud, P., & Haeringer, J. (2014). La gouvernance des associations en pratique. Le Mouvement Associatif.
   Google Scholar
• Bunger, A. C. (2013). Administrative coordination in nonprofit human service delivery networks: The role of competition and trust. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012451369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatelain-Ponroy, S., Eynaud, P., & Sponem, S. (2014). La gouvernance associative: Entre diversité et normalisation. In A. Burlaud (Ed.), Comptabilité, Finance et Politique. De la pratique à la théorie: L’art de la conceptualisation (pp. 219–226). ECS.
   Google Scholar
• Cheriet, F., & Guillaumin, P. (2013). Les déterminants de la satisfaction des partenaires engagés dans des coopérations inter-entreprises: Cas des fruits et légumes en Méditerranée. Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional, 17(4), 210–224 https://doi.org/10.7202/1020678ar.
   Google Scholar
• Chisolm, L. B. (2008). What would the princess want? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(3), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.191
   Google Scholar
• Chokkalingam, T. S. V., & Ramachandran, T. (2015). The perception of donors on existing regulations and code of governance in Singapore on charities and non-profit organizations – A conceptual study. Asian Social Science, 11(9), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n9p89
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How does accountability affect mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.143
   Google Scholar
• Cordery, C. J., & Sinclair, R. (2013). Measuring performance in the third sector. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(3/4), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0014
   Google Scholar
• Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: Why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2014-0092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croutsche, J.-J. (2002). Étude des relations de causalité: Utilisation des modèles d’équations structurelles (approche méthodologique). La Revue Des Sciences de Gestion: Direction Et Gestion, (198), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1051/larsg:2002037
   Google Scholar
• Cumberland, D. M., Kerrick, S. A., D’Mello, J., & Petrosko, J. M. (2015). Nonprofit board balance and perceived performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(4), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). “The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)” The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorobantu, S., Henisz, W. J., & Nartey, L. (2012). Stakeholder capital and performance in tough times. University of Pennsylvania and University of South Carolina https://extranet.sioe.org/uploads/isnie2012/dorobantu_henisz_nartey.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dubost, N., & Zoukoua, E.-A. (2011). Qu’est-ce qu’une association performante? Apport et influence des représentations sociales dans le secteur social et médico-social. Comptabilités, Économie Et Société, 1(10), 1–23 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00650425/document.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34 (2014) , 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. G., & Saltzman, D. (2011). Achieving sustainability through integrated reporting. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(3), 56–61 https://ssir.org/articles/entry/achieving_sustainability_through_integrated_reporting.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00019-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fabre, P. (2005). L’évaluation de la performance des associations dans les villes françaises, entre proximité et contingence. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, 11(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.111.0055
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Gálvez Rodríguez, M. D. M., Caba Pérez, M. D. C., & López Godoy, M. (2012). Determining factors in online transparency of NGOs: A Spanish case study. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(3), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9229-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gond, J.-P., & Mercier, S. (2005). Les théories des parties prenantes: Une synthèse critique de la littérature. Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche sur les ressources humaines et l’emploi, Université des sciences sociales de Toulouse.
   Google Scholar
• Gugerty, M. K. (2009). Signaling virtue: Voluntary accountability programs among nonprofit organizations. Policy Sciences, 42(3), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9085-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadad, S., & Gauca, O. D. (2014). Social impact measurement in social entrepreneurial organizations. Management & Marketing, 9(2), 119 http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/445.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. (2014). Evaluation logics in the third sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9339-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. H., Andrukow, A., Barr, C., Brock, K., de Wit, M., & Embuldeniya, D. (2003). The Capacity to serve: A qualitative study of the challenges facing Canada’s nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Y., Murray, V., & Cornforth, C. (2013). Perceptions of board chair leadership effectiveness in nonprofit and voluntary sector organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(3), 688–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9274-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., Arregle, J.-L., & Holmes, R. M., Jr. (2021). Strategic management theory in a post-pandemic and non-ergodic world. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoarau, C., & Laville, J.-L. (Eds.). (2008). La gouvernance des associations: Économie, sociologie, gestion. Erès.
   Google Scholar
• Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Institute for Public Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M. (2016). Moderating effects of identification on volunteer engagement: An exploratory study of a faith-based charity organization. Journal of Communication Management, 20(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2014-0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, D., & Lewis, A. (2009). Human service sector nonprofit organization’s social impact. Business Strategy Series, 10(6), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/17515630911005664
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Kim, J., Marshall, R., & Afzali, H. (2018). Stakeholder influence, institutional duality, and CSR involvement of MNC subsidiaries. Journal of Business Research, 91(2018), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.044
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, K. (2009). Nonprofit governance during organizational transition in voluntary associations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner, R. J., & Poole, P. P. (1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7(2), 119–136. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130070203
   Google Scholar
• Lacroux, A. (2009). L’analyse des modèles de relations structurelles par la méthode PLS: Une approche émergente dans la recherche quantitative en GRH. XXème Congrès de l’AGRH, 1–27 https://www.agrh.fr/assets/actes/2009lacroux073.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Lecy, J. D., Schmitz, H. P., & Swedlund, H. (2012). Non-Governmental and not-for-profit organizational effectiveness: A modern synthesis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(2), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9204-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(98)80020-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Clerkin, R. M. (2017). The adoption of outcome measurement in human service nonprofits. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 3(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.3.2.111-134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liket, K. C., Rey García, M., & Maas, K. E. H. (2014). Why aren’t evaluations working and what to do about it: A framework for negotiating meaningful evaluation in nonprofits. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013517736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo, I. M., & Carlos Pinho, J. (2006). The relationship between resource dependence and market orientation: The specific case of non-profit organisations. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5/6), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610657822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainardes, W. E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision, 50(10), 1861–1879. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211279648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mano, R. S. (2010). Marketing and performance evaluations in non-profit services: “Missed” targeting in communicating stakeholders’ expectations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(6), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401011063948
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., Hazlett, S., & Casey, C. (2005). Performance management in the UK public sector: Addressing multiple stakeholder complexity. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(3), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510591542
   Google Scholar
• Michel, G., & Rieunier, S. (2008). La marque associative: Mesure d’image et analyse de son influence sur le don. Actes Du 24ème Congrès de l’Association Française Du Marketing, 1–41 https://www.afm-marketing.org/en/system/files/publications/fichier_1905.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Mihaltan, D. C., Vitan, D., & Cucui, G. (2015). Analysing the financial effectiveness of the nonprofits. Case Study on Health Nonprofits. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26(2015), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00866-7
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (2002). Toward a self-regulatory form of accountability in the voluntary sector. Policy & Politics, 30(4), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557302760590378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. E. (2013). The construct of organizational effectiveness: Perspectives from leaders of international nonprofits in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(2), 324–345. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011434589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi, P., & Mishra, D. (2010). Conceptualising market orientation in non-profit organisations: Definition, performance, and preliminary construction of a scale. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(5–6), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672570903485113
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, A. T., & Puck, J. (2013). Revisiting the Trust-performance Link in Strategic Alliances. Management International Review, 53(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0145-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., Williams, D., Higgins, A., & Tou, M. (2005). The measurement of responsible governance and management of NPOs in New Zealand: An evaluation tool for NPOs, donors and government. “If you have no money – You have no mission. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510562730
   Google Scholar
• Murray, V. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations. In R. D. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management. Jossey-Bass, 345–370.
   Google Scholar
• Murtaza, N. (2012). Putting the Lasts First: The Case for Community-Focused and Peer-Managed NGO Accountability Mechanisms. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9181-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.1996.tb00112.x
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L., Szkudlarek, B., & Seymour, R. G. (2015). Social impact measurement in social enterprises: An interdependence perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 32(4), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, G., Newton, C., & McGregor-Lowndes, M. (2012). The nonprofit board as a team: Pilot results and initial insights. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., Diaz, W., & O’Sullivan, J. F. (2002). Negotiating accountability: Managerial lessons from identity-based nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002311001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, C. R. (1979). Measuring outcomes of college: Fifty years of findings and recommendations for future assessment. Proquest/Csa Journal Div.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, R. (2003). La gouvernance de l’entreprise. La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Plaisance, G. (2021). Evaluar sin medios: El caso del impacto de las organizaciones sin fines de lucro. Revista de Contabilidad Y Dirección, 32(1887-570X), 93–110 https://accid.org/revista-de-comptabilitat-i-direccio-num-32/.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., Landreth Grau, S., & McDonald, S. (2016). Perspectives on social impact measurement and non-profit organisations. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2014-0221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polzin, F. (2010). Stakeholder management in social ventures – Exploring the effects of stakeholder salience, trust and conflict on social enterprise performance (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2578449). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2578449
   Google Scholar
• Powers, E., & Yaros, R. A. (2012). Supporting online nonprofit news organizations: Do financial contributions influence stakeholder expectations and engagement? Journal of Media Business Studies, 9(3), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2012.11073551
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, A., & Gugerty, M. K. (2010). Trust but verify? Voluntary regulation programs in the nonprofit sector. Regulation & Governance, 4(1), 22–47 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratihari, S. K., & Uzma, S. H. (2018). Corporate social identity: An analysis of the Indian banking sector. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(7), 1248–1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-03-2017-0046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quéinnec, E. (2012). Mettre la performance au service de la solidarité: Le management stratégique des organisations non gouvernementales « humanitaires ». In E. Bayle & J.-C. Dupuis (Eds.), Management des entreprises de l’économie sociale et solidaire (1r ed., pp. 251). De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.bayle.2012.01.0251
   Google Scholar
• Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717727718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehli, F., & Jäger, U. P. (2011). The governance of international nongovernmental organizations: How funding and volunteer involvement affect board nomination modes and stakeholder representation in international nongovernmental organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9197-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey García, M. (2008). Evaluating the organizational performance and social impact of third sector organizations: A new functional realm for nonprofit marketing. 8th International Society for Third Sector Research (ISTR) Conference. Working Papers Series, VI, 1–24 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.453.2751&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rey García, M., Álvarez González, L. I., & Bello Acebrón, L. (2013). The untapped potential of marketing for evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations: A framework proposal. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-012-0085-1
   Google Scholar
• Rimington, J. (2018). Five tips to avoid a scandal like Oxfam Great Britain’s. Stanford Social Innovation Review https://ssir.org/articles/entry/five_tips_to_avoid_a_scandal_like_oxfam_great_britain#.
   Google Scholar
• Roussel, P., Durrieu, F., Campoy, E., & El Akremi, A. (2002). Méthodes d’équations structurelles: Recherches et applications en gestion. Edition Economica Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., & Lee, S. (2004). Donor trust and relationship commitment in the U.K. Charity Sector: The impact on behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004263321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1784–1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefora, N., & Mihaela, T. T. (2016). Volunteers trust in organizational mission, leadership and activities efficiency. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 25(1), 995–1001 http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2016/n1/98.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Small, K. (2007). Social dimensions of community festivals: An application of factor analysis in the development of the social impact perception (SIP) scale. Event Management, 11(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599508783943219
   Google Scholar
• Speckbacher, G. (2008). Nonprofit versus corporate governance: An economic approach. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(3), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.187
   Google Scholar
• Sprecher, T. (2010). Foundation governance in Switzeriand. In K. J. Hopt, and T. Von Hippel (Eds.), Comparative corporate governance of non-profit organizations. Cambridge University Press, 815–828.
   Google Scholar
• Steen-Johnsen, K., Eynaud, P., & Wijkström, F. (2011). On civil society governance: An emergent research field. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9211-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stievenart, E., & Pache, A.-C. (2014). Evaluer l’impact social d’une entreprise sociale: Points de repère. Revue Internationale de L’économie Sociale: Recma, 2014(331), 76. https://doi.org/10.7202/1023486ar
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, P. G., Hancock, M. G., & Hums, M. A. (2017). Elements of capacity in youth development nonprofits: An exploratory study of Urban sport for development and peace organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(5), 2053–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9876-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swierzy, P., Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2018). The impact of organizational capacity on voluntary engagement in sports clubs: A multi-level analysis. Sport Management Review, 21(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. A., & Miller-Stevens, K. (2019). Relational exchange in nonprofits: The role of identity saliency and relationship satisfaction. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 24(2), e1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchernonog, V., & Prouteau, L. (2019). Le paysage associatif français: Mesures et évolutions. Dalloz.
   Google Scholar
• Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, M. V. (2005). A social identity model of prosocial behaviors within nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.82
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, A. A., Greiling, D., & Hebesberger, H. (2018). GRI sustainability reporting by INGOs: A way forward for improving accountability? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(5), 853–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9976-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2017). Will you trust me?: How individual american donors respond to informational signals regarding local and global humanitarian charities. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9782-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., & Bortree, D. (2007). Measuring the volunteer-nonprofit organization relationship: An application of public relations theory. International Journal of Volunteer Administration, 24(6), 57–67 https://www.ijova.org/docs/IJOVA_VOL24_NO6_Waters.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., & Bortree, D. S. (2012). Advancing relationship management theory: Mapping the continuum of relationship types. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellens, L., & Jegers, M. (2014). Beneficiary participation as an instrument of downward accountability: A multiple case study. European Management Journal, 32(6), 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, J., & Faulk, L. (2019). Does voluntary disclosure matter when organizations violate stakeholder trust? Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.21.45
   Google Scholar
• Willems, J., Huybrechts, G., Jegers, M., Weijters, B., Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., & Pepermans, R. (2012). Nonprofit governance quality: Concept and measurement. Journal of Social Service Research, 38(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2012.703578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, J., Jegers, M., & Faulk, L. (2016). Organizational effectiveness reputation in the nonprofit sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 454–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1108802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. P., & Taylor, J. A. (2013). Resolving accountability ambiguity in nonprofit organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(3), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9266-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar