Gene and protein expression of myosin heavy chain in Nellore cattle comparing growth or meat tenderness traits

References

• Troy DJ, Kerry JP. Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Sci. 2010;86(1):214–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner J, Albrecht E, Fiedler I, Teuscher F, Papstein HJ, Ender K. Growth- and breed-related changes of muscle fiber characteristics in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2000;78(6):1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefaucheur L. A second look into fibre typing – relation to meat quality. Meat Sci. 2010;84(2):257–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa P, Simões JA, Costa ASH. Repercussions of growth path on carcass characteristics, meat colour and shear force in Alentejana bulls. Animal. 2015;9(8):1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry D, Thompson JM. The effect of growth rate during backgrounding and finishing on meat quality traits in beef cattle. Meat Sci. 2005;69(4):691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purchas RW, Burnham DL, Morris ST. Effects of growth potential and growth path on tenderness of beef longissimus muscle from bulls and steers. J Anim Sci. 2002;80(12):3211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGilchrist P, Greenwood PL, Pethick DW, Gardner GE. Selection for increased muscling in Angus cattle did not increase the glycolytic potential or negatively impact pH decline, retail colour stability or mineral content. Meat Sci. 2016;114:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazili AQ, Lee GK, Parr T, Sensky PL, Bardsley RG, Buttery PJ. The effect of altered growth rates on the calpain proteolytic system and meat tenderness in cattle. Meat Sci. 2004;66(1):195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiaffino S, Mammucari C. Regulation of skeletal muscle growth by the IGF1-Akt/PKB pathway: insights from genetic models. Skeletal Muscle. 2011;1(1):4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chikuni K, Muroya S, Nakajima I. Myosin heavy chain isoforms expressed in bovine skeletal muscles. Meat Sci. 2004;67(1):87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanabe RI, Muroya S, Chikuni K. Sequencing of the 2a, 2x, and slow isoforms of the bovine myosin heavy chain and the different expression among muscles. Mamm Genome. 1998;9(12):1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev. 2011;91(4):1447–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard C, Cassar-Malek I, Renand G, Hocquette JF. Changes in muscle gene expression related to metabolism according to growth potential in young bulls. Meat Sci. 2009;82(2):205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti J, Castan E, Dal Pai M, Arrigoni MDB, Rodrigues Baldin S, De Oliveira HN. Expression of genes related to quality of longissimus dorsi muscle meat in Nellore (Bos indicus) and Canchim (5/8 Bos taurus × 3/8 Bos indicus) cattle. Meat Sci. 2013;94(2):247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tizioto PC, Decker JE, Taylor JF, et al. Genome scan for meat quality traits in Nelore beef cattle. Physiol Genomics. 2013;45(21):1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassini WA, Braga CP, Chardulo LAL, et al. Bioanalytical methods for the metalloproteomics study of bovine longissimus thoracis muscle tissue with different grades of meat tenderness in the Nellore breed (Bos indicus). Food Chem. 2015;169(April):65–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carvalho ME, Gasparin G, Poleti MD, et al. Heat shock and structural proteins associated with meat tenderness in Nellore beef cattle, a Bos indicus breed. Meat Sci. 2014;96(3):1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro A, Marrocco C, Rinalducci S, Mirasole C, Failla S, Zolla L. Chianina beef tenderness investigated through integrated Omics. J Proteomics. 2012;75:4381–4398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin N, Bonnet M, Jurie C, Picard B. Functional analysis of beef tenderness. J Proteomics. 2011;75(2):352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard B, Lebret B, Cassar-Malek I, et al. Recent advances in omic technologies for meat quality management. Meat Sci. 2015;109:18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquette JF, Lehnert S, Barendse W, Cassar-Malek I, Picard B. Recent advances in cattle functional genomics and their application to beef quality. Animal. 2007;1(1):159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard RH, Bruns KW. Controlling variation in feed intake through bunk management. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:E133–E138.
   Google Scholar
• Lanna DPD, Barioni LG, Nepomuceno NH, Almeida R. d, Tedeschi LO. (2011). Ração de Lucro Máximo - RLM 3.2 (p. 1). Retrieved from http://www.integrasoftware.com.br/rlm31/produto.php
   Google Scholar
• Roça R. d O. Abate humanitário de bovinos. Continuous Educ J. 2001;4:73–85.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. (1997). Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef. Retrieved December 18, 2017, from United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef website: https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/CarcassBeefStandard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Culler RD, Parrish FC Jr, Smith GC, Cross HR. Relationship of myofibril fragmentation index to certain chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of bovine longissimus muscle. J Food Science. 1978;43(4):1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction. Canadian J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–917.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldassini WA, Chardulo LAL, Silva JAV, et al. Meat quality traits of Nellore bulls according to different degrees of backfat thickness: a multivariate approach. Anim Prod Sci. 2017;57(2):363–370.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M. Sampling, cooking, and coring effects on Warner-Bratzler shear force values in beef. J Anim Sci. 1996;74(7):1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steibel JP, Poletto R, Coussens PM, Rosa GJM. A powerful and flexible linear mixed model framework for the analysis of relative quantification RT-PCR data. Genomics. 2009;94(2):146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vechetti-Júnior IJ, Aguiar AF, De Souza RWA, et al. NFAT isoforms regulate muscle fiber type transition without altering can during aerobic training. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34:861–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3(7):research0034.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquette JF, Gondret F, Baéza E, Médale F, Jurie C, Pethick DW. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal. 2010;4(02):303–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy VH, Harper GS, Greenwood PL, McDonagh MB. Nutritional and developmental effects on the intrinsic properties of muscles as they relate to the eating quality of beef. Aust J Exp Agric. 2001;41(7):921.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf DM, O'Connor SF, Tatum JD, Smith GC. Using objective measures of muscle color to predict beef longissimus tenderness. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(3):684–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chardulo LAL, Silveira AC, Vianello F. Analytical aspects for tropical meat quality assessment. In: Lima GPP, Vianello F, eds, Springer, Vienna. Food Quality, Safety and Technology. 2013:53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce KL, Rosenvold K, Andersen HJ, Hopkins DL. Water distribution and mobility in meat during the conversion of muscle to meat and ageing and the impacts on fresh meat quality attributes – a review. Meat Sci. 2011;89(2):111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard B, Gagaoua M, Micol D, Cassar-Malek I, Hocquette JF, Terlouw CEM. Inverse relationships between biomarkers and beef tenderness according to contractile and metabolic properties of the muscle. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62(40):9808–9818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard B, Cassar-Malek I. Evidence for expression of IIb myosin heavy chain isoform in some skeletal muscles of Blonde d’Aquitaine bulls. Meat Sci. 2009;82(1):30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreurs NM, Garcia F, Jurie C, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of animal maturity on muscle characteristics in different muscles, breeds, and sexes of cattle. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(11):2872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero JLL, Talmadge RJ, Edgerton VR. Fibre size and metabolic properties of myosin heavy chain-based fibre types in rat skeletal muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motility. 1998;19:733–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães AFB, de Camargo GMF, Fernandes GA, et al. Genome-wide association study of meat quality traits in Nellore cattle. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouse JD, Koohmaraie M, Seideman SD. The relationship of muscle fibre size to tenderness of beef. Meat Sci. 1991;30(4):295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamora F, Debiton E, Lepetit J, Lebert A, Dransfield E, Ouali A. Predicting variability of ageing and toughness in beef M. longissimus lumborum et thoracis. Meat Sci. 1996;43(3–4):321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chriki S, Picard B, Jurie C, et al. Meta-analysis of the comparison of the metabolic and contractile characteristics of two bovine muscles: longissimus thoracis and semitendinosus. Meat Sci. 2012;91(4):423–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renand G, Picard B, Touraille C, Berge P, Lepetit J. Relationships between muscle characteristics and meat quality traits of young Charolais bulls. Meat Sci. 2001;59(1):49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strydom PE, Naude RT, Smith MF, Scholtz MM, Van Wyk JB. Characterisation of indigenous African cattle breeds in relation to meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 2000;55(1):79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmers K, Ngu NT, Jennen DGJ, et al. Relationship between myosin heavy chain isoform expression and muscling in several diverse pig breeds. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(4):795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tizioto PC, Coutinho LL, Mourão GB, et al. Variation in myogenic differentiation 1 mRNA abundance is associated with beef tenderness in Nelore cattle. Anim Genet. 2016;47(4):491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen DL, Sartorius CA, Sycuro LK, Leinwand LA. Different pathways regulate expression of the skeletal myosin heavy chain genes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(47):43524–43533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YM, Ryu YC, Kim BC. Effect of myosin heavy chain isoforms on muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality in porcine longissimus muscle. J Muscle Foods. 2006;17(4):413.
   Google Scholar
• Du YF, Ding QL, Li YM, Fang WR. Identification of differentially expressed genes and pathways for myofiber characteristics in soleus muscles between chicken breeds differing in meat quality. Anim Biotechnol. 2017;28(2):83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliván M, Martı́nez A, Osoro K. Effect of muscular hypertrophy on physico-chemical, biochemical and texture traits of meat from yearling bulls. Meat Sci. 2004;68(4):567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff Lonergan E, Zhang W, Lonergan SM. Biochemistry of postmortem muscle – lessons on mechanisms of meat tenderization. Meat Sci. 2010;86(1):184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar