Evaluation of a panel of microsatellite markers to study their applications in Serrapinnus notomelas and to reveal the genetic diversity in Hyphessobrycon eques

References

• Buckup PA, et al. Catálogo das espécies de peixes de água doce do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional; 2006. 195p.
   Google Scholar
• Yunis Aguinaga J, Claudiano GS, Marcusso PF, et al. Acute toxicity and determination of the active constituents of aqueous extract of Uncaria tomentosa bark in Hyphessobrycon eques. J Toxicol. 2014;2014:412437–418191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marcon J, Lopes DS, Mounteer AH, Goulart AMA, Leandro MV, Benjamin LA. Pathological and histometric analysis of the gills of female Hyphessobrycon eques (Teleostei:Characidae) exposed to different concentrations of the insecticide Dimilin(®). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;131:135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan CH, Chien YH, Wang YJ. Antioxidant defence to ammonia stress of characins (Hyphessobrycon eques Steindachner) fed diets supplemented with carotenoids. Aquaculture Nutr. 2011;17(3):258–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopera-Barrero NM. Conservation of Brycon orbignyanus natural populations and stocks for their reproductive, genetic, environmental sustainability: a model for species threatened with extinction. Ciência e Investigación Agrária. 2009;36:191–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul-Muneer PM. Application of microsatellite markers in conservation genetics and fisheries management: recent advances in population structure analysis and conservation strategies. Genet Res Int. 2014;2014:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira EJ, Pádua JG, Zucchi MI, Vencovsky R, Vieira MLC. Origin, evolution and genome distribution of microsatellites. Genet Mol Biol. 2006;29(2):294–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza FPD, Urrea-Rojas AM, Ruas CDF, et al. Novel microsatellite markers for the endangered neotropical fish Brycon orbignyanus and cross-amplification in related species. Ital J Anim Sci. 2018;17(4):916–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro PLD, Ribeiro RP, Santos SCAD, Goes ESDR, et al. Cross-amplification of heterologous microsatellite markers in Piracanjuba. Ciencia Anim. 2017;47:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Benitez RS, Súarez YR. Biologia populacional de Serrapinnus notomelas (Eingenmann, 1915) (Characiformes, Cheirodontinae) em um riacho de primeira ordem na bacia do rio Dourados, Alto do Paraná. Pan-Am J Aquatic Sci. 2009;4(3):271–278.
   Google Scholar
• Costa DI, Rocha VM. Feeding ecology of Serrapinnus notomelas (Characiformes: Cheirodontinae) in small forests streams in the Machado River basin, Rondônia, Brazil. Acta Amaz. 2017;47(1):19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meletti PC, Rocha O. Development of a chamber for in situ toxicity tests with small fishes. Braz J Biol. 2002;62(1):187–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopera-Barrero NM, Povh JA, Ribeiro RP, Gomes PC, Jacometo CB, Silva Lopes Td. Lopes TS Comparación de protocolos de extracción de ADN con muestras de aleta y larva de peces: extracciónmodificada con sal (NaCl). Cienc Inv Agr. 2008;35(1):15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Billotte N, Lagoda PJL, Risterucci AM, Baurens FC. Microsatellite-enriched libraries: applied methodology for the development of SSR markers in tropical crops. Fruits (Paris). 1999;54:277–288.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Molecular Biol. 2000;132:365–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4(3):535–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(3):564–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudet J. FSTAT: a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3.2). Lausanne: UNIL – Department of Ecology and Evolution, 2005. Disponível em: <https://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Cournuet JM, Luikart G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 1996;144:2001–2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol. 2007;16:1099–1106. Disponível em: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17305863>. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besnier F, Glover KA. ParallelStructure: A R package to distribute parallel runs of the population genetics program STRUCTURE on multi-core computers. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e70651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl DA, Vonholdt BM. Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkhir K. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000. Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France). 2004. Disponível em: <https://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/genetix/>
   Google Scholar
• Botstein D, et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Human Genet. 2017;32:314–331.
   Google Scholar
• Apolinário-Silva C, Ferreira DG, Cavenagh AF, et al. Development and characterization of fifteen polymorphic microsatellite loci in Bryconamericus aff. iheringii (Teleostei: Characidae) and cross-amplification in related Characidae species. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2018;16(1):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazzi-Gomes P, Guerreiro S, Palheta GDA, Melo NFAC, Santos S, Hamoy I. High genetic diversity and connectivity in Colossoma macropomum in the Amazon basin revealed by microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Biol. 2017;40(1):142–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton JM, Slate K, Bancroft DR, Barret JA. Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: a caution for parentage and population studies. Mol Ecol. 1995;4(2):249–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders MJM, Bredemeijer W, Rus-Kortekass P, Arens P, Vosman B. Use of shot microsatellites from database sequences to generate polymorphisms among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars and acessions of other Lycopersion species. Theor Appl Genet. 1997;97:264–272.
   Google Scholar
• Vaini JO, Mota GK, Ojeda AP, Barreiros JP, Moreira RG, Hilsdorf AWS. Development and characterization of 20 polymorphic microsatellite markers for Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) (Perciformes: Epinephelidae) using 454 pyrosequencing. Genet Mol Biol. 2019;42(1):74–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira AA, Hilsdorf AWS, Silva JV, Souza VR. Variabilidade genética de duas variedades de tilápia nilótica por meio de marcadores microssatélites. Pesq Agropec Bras. 2007;42(4):521–526.
   Google Scholar
• Wognin MG, Sokouri DP, Kouassi CN, Dayo GK, Wongbé Y, Valentine YC. Diversité génétique de six populations de Heterobranchus longifilis de Côte d’Ivoire. J Anim Plant Sci. 2020;44:7621–7633.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanie HA, Gilbey J. Genetic diversity and differentiation of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) revealed by DNA microsatellites. Aquac Research. 2005;36(14):1450–1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendorf FW, Leary RF. Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animais. In: Soulé ME, ed. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc; 1986:57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Simpson SA, et al. Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science. 1998;282(5394):1695–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. Fundamentos de Genética da Conservação. Riberão Preto: Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. 2008;262:65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Resende EK, Oliveira CAL, Legat AP, Ribeiro RP. Melhoramento animal no Brasil: uma visão crítica espécies aquáticas. Simpósio Brasileiro de Melhoramento Animal-SBMA 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira RC, Santos MDCF, Bernardino G, Hrbek T, Farias IP. From river to farm: an evaluation of genetic diversity in wild and aquaculture stocks of Brycon amazonicus (Spix & Agassiz, 1829), Characidae, Bryconinae. Hydrobiologia. 2018;805(1):75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza FP, Castro PL, Goes ESR, et al. Genetic variability of Prochilodus lineatus in artificial and semi-natural reproduction. Ital J Anim Sci. 2018;17(2):321–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primmer CR, Møller AP, Ellegren H. A wide-range survey of cross-species microsatellite amplification in birds. Mol Ecol. 1996;5(3):365–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar