Rumen microbial diversity, enteric methane emission and nutrient utilization of crossbred Karan-Fries cattle (Bos taurus) and Murrah buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) consuming varied roughage concentrate ratio

References

• Wirth R, Kádár G, Kakuk B, et al. The planktonic core microbiome and core functions in the cattle rumen by next generation sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2018;9(2285):2285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flint HJ. The rumen microbial ecosystem—some recent developments. Trends Microbiol. 1997;5(12):483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Benno Y. Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(6):2766–2774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirohi SK, Singh N, Dagar SS, Puniya AK. Molecular tools for deciphering the microbial community structure and diversity in rumen ecosystem. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;95(5):1135–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jami E, Mizrahi I. Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PloS One. 2012;7(3):e33306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JE, McEwan NR, Travis AJ, Wallace RJ. 16S rDNA library-based analysis of ruminal bacterial diversity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2004;86(3):263–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathani NM, Patel AK, Mootapally CS, et al. Effect of roughage on rumen microbiota composition in the efficient feed converter and sturdy Indian Jaffrabadi buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jami E, White BA, Mizrahi I. Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency. PloS One. 2014;9(1):e85423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulc JM, Antonopoulos DA, Miller MEB, et al. Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(6):1948–1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, et al. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science. 2011;331(6016):463–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal MW, Zhang Q, Yang Y, et al. Comparative study of rumen fermentation and microbial community differences between water buffalo and Jersey cows under similar feeding conditions. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2018; 46(1):740–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Janssen PH. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci. Rep. 2015; 5(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Baca-González V, Asensio-Calavia P, González-Acosta S, Pérez de la Lastra JM, Morales de la Nuez A. Morales de la Nuez A. Are vaccines the solution for methane emissions from ruminants? A systematic review. Vaccines. 2020; 8(3):460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabat SKB, Sasson G, Doron-Faigenboim A, et al. Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants. ISME J. 2016;10(12):2958–2972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyero N, Kapoor V, Tewatia BS. Effect of different roughage: concentrate ratio on milk yield and its fatty acid profile in dairy cows. J Biol Agric Health. 2015;5:176–185.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit S, Keshri A, Vinay VV, Kundu SS. Effect of graded levels of dietary crude protein on nutrient utilization and enteric methane emissions in growing Murrah buffalo calves. IJDS. 2021;74(6):550–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanapat M, Gunun P, Anantasook N, Kang S. Changes of rumen pH, fermentation and microbial population as influenced by different ratios of roughage (rice straw) to concentrate in dairy steers. J Agric Sci. 2014;152(4):675–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison MJ, Conant GC, Cockrum RR, et al. Diet alters both the structure and taxonomy of the ovine gut microbial ecosystem. DNA Res. 2014;21(2):115–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapio I, Fischer D, Blasco L, Tapio M, Wallace RJ, et al. Taxon abundance, diversity, co-occurrence and network analysis of the ruminal microbiota in response to dietary changes in dairy cows. Plos One. 2017;12(7):e0180260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh KM, Pandya PR, Tripathi AK, et al. Study of rumen metagenome community using qPCR under different diets. Meta Gene. 2014;2:191–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wanapat M, Cherdthong A. Use of real-time PCR technique in studying rumen cellulolytic bacteria population as affected by level of roughage in swamp buffalo. Curr Microbiol. 2009;58(4):294–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Jung JY, Oh YK, Lee SS, Madsen EL, Jeon CO. Comparative survey of rumen microbial communities and metabolites across one caprine and three bovine groups, using bar-coded pyrosequencing and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(17):5983–5993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanapat M, Ngarmsang A, Korkhuntot S, et al. A comparative study on the rumen microbial population of cattle and swamp buffalo raised under traditional village conditions in the northeast of Thailand. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2000;13(7):918–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanthakhoun V, Wanapat M, Kongmun P, Cherdthong A. Comparison of ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial population in swamp buffalo and cattle. Livest Sci. 2012;143(2-3):172–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AK, Chaturvedi VB, Singh P, Kerketta S. Assessment of nutrient utilization capacity of cross bred cattle and buffaloes fed diets containing different ratios of concentrate and roughage. Int J Livest Res. 2018;8:1–265.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha SK, Chaturvedi VB, Verma AK, Patil AK, Shivani S. Effect of Feeding Total Mixed Ration on Methane Emission and Energy Metabolism in Crossbred Cattle and Buffaloes. J Ani Res. 2016;6(1):921–926.
   Google Scholar
• Niu M, Appuhamy J, Leytem AB, Dungan RS, Kebreab E. Effect of dietary crude protein and forage contents on enteric methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from dairy cows simultaneously. Anim Prod Sci. 2016;56(3):312–321.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrò S, Infascelli F, Tudisco R, et al. Estimation of in vitro methane production in buffalo and cow. Buffalo Bull. 2013;32(2):924–927.
   Google Scholar
• Della Rosa MM, Jonker A, Waghorn GC. A review of technical variations and protocols used to measure methane emissions from ruminants using respiration chambers, SF6 tracer technique and Green Feed, to facilitate global integration of published data. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2021;279(115018):115018.
   Google Scholar
• Moate PJ, Pryce JE, Marett LC, et al. Measurement of enteric methane emissions by the SF6 technique is not affected by ambient weather conditions. Animals. 2021;11(2):528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAR. 2013. Nutrient Requirements of Cattle and Buffalo (ICAR-NIANP). 3rd ed. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agriculture Research.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74(10):3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th revised ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson K, Huyler M, Westberg H, Lamb B, Zimmerman P. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. Environ Sci Technol. 1994; 28(2):359–3562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kala A, Kamra DN, Kumar A, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC, Joshi CG. Impact of levels of total digestible nutrients on microbiome, enzyme profile and degradation of feeds in buffalo rumen. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(7):5069–5072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Song L, Breitwieser FP, Salzberg SL. Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res. 2016;26(12):1721–1729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitwieser FP, Salzberg SL. Pavian  . Interactive analysis of metagenomics data for microbiomics and pathogen identification. BioRxiv. 2016;084715.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, et al. The vegan package. Commun Ecol Package. 2007;10(631–637):719.
   Google Scholar
• Santra A, Karim SA. Effect of dietary roughage and concentrate ratio on nutrient utilization and performance of ruminant animals. Anim. Nutri. Feed Technol. 2009;9(2):113–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Wang C, Huasai S, Chen A. Effects of dietary forage to concentrate ratio on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and rumen bacterial composition in Angus cows. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapitan RM, Del Barrio AN, Katsube O, et al. Comparison of fattening performance in Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on high roughage diet. Anim Sci J. 2008;79(1):76–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney CS, Kennedy PM, John A. Reticulo-ruminal motility in cattle (Bos indicus) and water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) fed a low quality roughage diet. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1989;94(4):635–638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anantasook N, Wanapat M, Cherdthong A, Gunun P. Changes of microbial population in the rumen of dairy steers as influenced by plant containing tannins and saponins and roughage to concentrate ratio. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. sci. 2013;26(11):1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nampoothiri VM, Mohini M, Malla BA, Mondal G, Pandita S. Growth performance, and enteric and manure greenhouse gas emissions from Murrah calves fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios. Anim Nutri. 2018; 4(2):215–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Fernandez G, Denman SE, McSweeney CS. Sample processing methods impacts on rumen microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2019;10(861):861.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patra AK. The effect of dietary fats on methane emissions, and its other effects on digestibility, rumen fermentation and lactation performance in cattle: a meta-analysis. Livest Sci. 2013;155(2–3):244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanh VTK. The effect on intake digestibility and microbial protein production of adding urea to rice straw for cattle and buffalo calves. Livest Sci. 2012;150(1-3):111–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidane A, Øverland M, Mydland LT, Prestløkken E. Interaction between feed use efficiency and level of dietary crude protein on enteric methane emission and apparent nitrogen use efficiency with Norwegian Red dairy cows1. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(9):3967–3982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace RJ, Atasoglu C, Newbold CJ. Role of peptides in rumen microbial metabolism-review. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 1999;12(1):139–147. 1999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik PK, Trivedi S, Mohapatra A, Kolte AP, Sejian V, et al. Comparison of enteric methane yield and diversity of ruminal methanogens in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg MR, Kannan A, Phondba BT, Shelke SK, Sherasia PL. A study on the effect of ration balancing for improving milk production and reducing methane emission in lactating buffaloes under field conditions. Ind. J. Dairy Sci. 2012;65(3):250–255.
   Google Scholar
• Bharanidharan R, Arokiyaraj S, Kim EB, Lee CH, Woo YW, et al. Ruminal methane emissions, metabolic, and microbial profile of Holstein steers fed forage and concentrate, separately or as a total mixed ration. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granja-Salcedo YT, Ribeiro Júnior CS, de Jesus RB, et al. Effect of different levels of concentrate on ruminal microorganisms and rumen fermentation in Nellore steers. Archiv Anim Nutri. 2016;70(1):17–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun HZ, Peng KL, Xue MY, Liu JX. Metagenomics analysis revealed the distinctive ruminal microbiome and resistive profiles in dairy buffaloes. Anim. Microbiome. 2021;3(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li YQ, Xi YM, Wang ZD, Zeng HF, Han Z. Combined signature of rumen microbiome and metabolome in dairy cows with different feed intake levels. J Anim Sci. 2020; 98(3):skaa070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao SY, Huo WJ, Zhu WY. Microbiome-metabolome analysis reveals unhealthy alterations in the composition and metabolism of ruminal microbiota with increasing dietary grain in a goat model. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(2):525–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann JC, Wickersham TA, Loor JJ. High-throughput methods redefine the rumen microbiome and its relationship with nutrition and metabolism. Bioinfo Biol Insights. 2014;8:BBI–S15389.
   Google Scholar
• Patel DD, Patel AK, Parmar NR, et al. Microbial and carbohydrate active enzyme profile of buffalo rumen metagenome and their alteration in response to variation in the diet. Gene. 2014;545(1):88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar NR, Solanki JV, Patel AB, et al. Metagenome of Mehsani buffalo rumen microbiota: an assessment of variation in feed-dependent phylogenetic and functional classification. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;24(4):249–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do TH, Dao TK, Nguyen KHV, et al. Metagenomic analysis of bacterial community structure and diversity of lignocellulolytic bacteria in Vietnamese native goat rumen. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018;31(5):738–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Hitch TC, Chen Y, Creevey CJ, Guan LL. Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome, its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):6–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernando SC, Purvis HT, Najar FZ, et al. Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(22):7482–7490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit RJ, Hinsu AT, Patel SH, et al. Microbiota composition, gene pool and its expression in Gir cattle (Bos indicus) rumen under different forage diets using metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approaches. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018;41(4):374–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deusch S, Camarinha-Silva A, Conrad J, Beifuss U, Rodehutscord M, Seifert J. A Structural and functional elucidation of the rumen microbiome influenced by various diets and micro environments. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purushe J, Fouts DE, Morrison M, et al. Comparative genome analysis of Prevotella ruminicola and Prevotella bryantii: insights into their environmental niche. Microb Ecol. 2010;60(4):721–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado B, Bach A, Guasch I, et al. Whole rumen metagenome sequencing allows classifying and predicting feed efficiency and intake levels in cattle. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yanagita K, Manome A, Meng XY, et al. Flow cytometric sorting, phylogenetic analysis and in situ detection of Oscillospira guillermondii, a large, morphologically conspicuous but uncultured ruminal bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53(Pt 5):1609–1614.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackie RI, Aminov RI, Hu W, et al. Ecology of uncultivated Oscillospira species in the rumen of cattle, sheep, and reindeer as assessed by microscopy and molecular approaches. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(11):6808–6815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkerni VD, Pant HC, Rai GS, Rawat JS. The seasonal variation in the concentration of protozoa and Oscillospira guilliermondii organisms in the rumen fluid of grazing buffalo. Indian Vet J. 1971;48(2):137–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinsu AT, Parmar NR, Nathani NM, Pandit RJ, Patel AB, et al. Functional gene profiling through metaRNAseq approach reveals diet-dependent variation in rumen microbiota of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anaerobe. 2017;44:106–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myer PR, Smith TP, Wells JE, Kuehn LA, Freetly HC. Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0129174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohra V, Dafale NA, Purohit HJ. Understanding the alteration in rumen microbiome and CAZymes profile with diet and host through comparative metagenomic approach. Arch Microbiol. 2019;201(10):1385–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose VL, Appoothy T, More RP, Arun AS. Metagenomic insights into the rumen microbial fibrolytic enzymes in Indian crossbred cattle fed finger millet straw. AMB Express. 2017;7(1):13–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Q, Gao X, Yang Y, Zou C, Yang Y, Lin B. A comparative study on rumen ecology of water buffalo and cattle calves under similar feeding regime. Vet Med Sci. 2020;6(4):746–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood EC, Torok VA, Hynd PI, Bryden W. Breed and diet influence the ruminal bacterial community of sheep. Anim Prod Sci. 2022;62(5):416–429.
   Google Scholar
• Asai K, Lwin KO, Tandang AG, Lapitan RM, Herrera JRV, et al. Comparative analysis of rumen bacteria between water buffalo and cattle fed the same diet during their fattening period in the Philippines. JARQ. 2021;55(1):69–75.
   Google Scholar