Genome-wide selection signatures address trait specific candidate genes in cattle indigenous to arid regions of India

References

• Loftus RT, MacHugh DE, Ngere LO, et al. Mitochondrial genetic variation in European, African and Indian cattle populations. Anim Genet. 1994;25(4):265–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flori L, Fritz S, Jaffrézic F, et al. The genome response to artificial selection: a case study in dairy cattle. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanaka KK, Sukhija N, Goli RC, et al. On the concepts and measures of diversity in the genomics era. Curr Plant Biol. 2023;33:100278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava AK, Patel J, Ankuya K, Chauhan H, Pawar M, Gupta J. Conservation of indigenous cattle breeds. J Anim Res. 2019;9(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Registered Cattle. ICAR-National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources; 2023. https://nbagr.icar.gov.in/en/registered-cattle/. Accessed June 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Gaur GK, Kaushik SN, Garg RC. The Gir cattle breed of India-characteristics and present status. Anim Genet Resour Inf. 2003;33:21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Godara AS, Tomar AKS, Patel M, Godara RS, Bhat SA, Bharati P. Body conformation in Tharparkar cattle as a tool of selection. J Anim Res. 2015;5(3):423–430.
   Google Scholar
• IMD. India Meteorological Department, Met Center Ahmedabad; 2023. https://mausam.imd.gov.in/ahmedabad/. Accessed January 7, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• AGRI-IS. Animal Genetic Resources of India Information System; 2023. https://nbagr.icar.gov.in/en/registered-cattle/. Accessed January 7, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Gahlot GC. Genetic Evaluation of Tharparkar Cattle [Ph.D. thesis]. Bikaner: Rajasthan Agricultural University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushish SK. Drought adapted breeds of livestock. In: Feeding and Management of Livestock During Drought and Scarcity; Scientific Publishers, 2012:271.
   Google Scholar
• Panigrahi M, Kumar H, Saravanan KA, et al. Trajectory of livestock genomics in South Asia: a comprehensive review. Gene. 2022;843:146808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan KA, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, Bhushan B, Dutt T, Mishra BP. Selection signatures in livestock genome: a review of concepts, approaches and applications. Livest Sci. 2020;241:104257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH. The “hitchhiking effect” revisited. Genetics. 1989;123(4):887–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JM, Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974;23(1):23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995;140(2):783–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay JC, Wu CI. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 2000;155(3):1405–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard J, Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene .  Genet Res . 2007;89(5–6):391–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan W. Selective sweeps. Genetics. 2019;211(1):5–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Stephan W. Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics. 2002;160(2):765–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi MH, Nejati-Javaremi A, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Dodds KG, McEwan JC. Genomic scan of selective sweeps in thin and fat tail sheep breeds for identifying of candidate regions associated with fat deposition. BMC Genet. 2012;13(1):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaumont MA. Adaptation and speciation: what can FST tell us? Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20(8):435–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Chhotaray S, et al. Identification of breed-specific SNP panel in nine different cattle genomes. Biomed Res. 2019;30(1):78–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Chhotaray S, et al. Comparative analysis of five different methods to design a breed-specific SNP panel for cattle. Anim Biotechnol. 2021;32(1):130–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Rajawat D, et al. Selection of breed-specific SNPs in three Indian sheep breeds using ovine 50 K array. Small Rumin Res.. 2021;205:106545.
   Google Scholar
• Groeneveld LF, Lenstra JA, Eding H, et al. Genetic diversity in farm animals—a review. Anim Genet. 2010;41 Suppl 1(s1):6–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009;461(7265):747–753.  . 
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra DC, Sikka P, Yadav S, et al. Identification and characterization of trait-specific SNPs using ddRAD sequencing in water buffalo. Genomics. 2020;112(5):3571–3578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surati U, Verma A, Niranjan SK, Verma A, Niranjan SK. Genome-wide in silico analysis leads to identification of deleterious L290V mutation in RBBP5 gene in Bos indicus. Anim Biotechnol. 2023;1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2023.2199502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vineeth MR, Surya T, Sivalingam J, et al. Genome-wide discovery of SNPs in candidate genes related to production and fertility traits in Sahiwal cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020;52(4):1707–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devadasan MJ, Kumar DR, Vineeth MR, et al. Reduced representation approach for identification of genome-wide SNPs and their annotation for economically important traits in Indian Tharparkar cattle. 3 Biotech. 2020;10(7):309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahman JU, Kumar D, Singh SP, et al. Genome-wide identification and annotation of SNPs and their mapping in candidate genes related to milk production and fertility traits in Badri cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023;55(2):117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wara AB, Kumar A, Singh A, Arthikeyan AK, Dutt T, Mishra BP. Genome wide association study of test day’s and 305 days milk yield in crossbred cattle. Indian J Anim Sci. 2019;89:861–865. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/93019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FASTX Toolkit. http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/. Accessed April 3, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
   Google Scholar
• Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(6):863–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catchen JM, Amores A, Hohenlohe P, Cresko W, Postlethwait JH. Stacks: building and genotyping loci de novo from short-read sequences. G3. 2011;1(3):171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARS-UCD1.3. BosTau9—Genome—Assembly—NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_002263795.2. Accessed July 3, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Li H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(21):2987–2993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10(2):giab008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik AA, Sharma R, Ahlawat S, Deb R, Negi MS, Tripathi SB. Analysis of genetic relatedness among Indian cattle (Bos indicus) using genotyping-by-sequencing markers. Anim Genet. 2018;49(3):242–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlidis P, Živković D, Stamatakis A, Alachiotis N. SweeD: likelihood-based detection of selective sweeps in thousands of genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(9):2224–2234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner SD. qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and manhattan plots. J Open Source Softw. 2018;3(25):731.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Ouyang Y, Yao W. shinyCircos: an R/Shiny application for interactive creation of Circos plot. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(7):1229–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu ZL, Park CA, Wu XL, Reecy JM. Animal QTLdb: an improved database tool for livestock animal QTL/association data dissemination in the post-genome era. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(database issue):D871–D879.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao J, Li Z, Sun Y, et al. MG2C: a user-friendly online tool for drawing genetic maps. Mol Hortic. 2021;1(1):16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirooznia M, Nagarajan V, Deng Y. GeneVenn—a web application for comparing gene lists using Venn diagrams. Bioinformation. 2007;1(10):420–422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mi H, Lazareva-Ulitsky B, Loo R, et al. The PANTHER database of protein families, subfamilies, functions and pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(database issue):D284–D288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weldenegodguad M, Popov R, Pokharel K, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of three native cattle breeds originating from the northernmost cattle farming regions. Front Genet. 2018;9:728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit SP, Bhatia AK, Ganguly I, et al. Genome analyses revealed genetic admixture and selection signatures in Bos indicus. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak SS, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Evidence for selective sweeps in the MHC gene repertoire of various cattle breeds. Anim Biotechnol. 2023;1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2023.2196317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajawat D, Panigrahi M, Nayak SS, et al. Uncovering genes underlying coat color variation in indigenous cattle breeds through genome-wide positive selection. Anim Biotechnol. 2023;1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2023.2240387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan KA, Rajawat D, Kumar H, et al. Signatures of selection in riverine buffalo populations revealed by genome-wide SNP data. Anim Biotechnol. 2022;1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2022.2145292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajawat D, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Identification of important genomic footprints using eight different selection signature statistics in domestic cattle breeds. Gene. 2022;816:146165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajawat D, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Revealing genomic footprints of selection for fiber and production traits in three Indian sheep breeds. J Nat Fibers. 2022;19(16):14963–14974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal N, Liu X, Yang T, et al. Genomic variants identified from whole-genome resequencing of indicine cattle breeds from Pakistan. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kõks S, Reimann E, Lilleoja R, et al. Sequencing and annotated analysis of full genome of Holstein breed bull. Mamm Genome. 2014;25(7-8):363–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stothard P, Choi JW, Basu U, et al. Whole genome resequencing of black Angus and Holstein cattle for SNP and CNV discovery. BMC Genom. 2011;12(1):559.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Donato M, Peters SO, Mitchell SE, Hussain T, Imumorin IG. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS): a novel, efficient and cost-effective genotyping method for cattle using next-generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e62137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivalingam J, Vineeth MR, Surya T, et al. Genomic divergence reveals unique populations among Indian Yaks. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramovs N, Brass A, Tassabehji M. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the large scale genomic sequencing era. Front Genet. 2020;11:210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(6):443–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Jemaa S, Adam G, Boussaha M, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals signals of adaptive admixture in Creole cattle. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan KA, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Genomic scans for selection signatures revealed candidate genes for adaptation and production traits in a variety of cattle breeds. Genomics. 2021;113(3):955–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravi Kumar D, Joel Devadasan M, Surya T, et al. Genomic diversity and selection sweeps identified in Indian swamp buffaloes reveals it’s uniqueness with riverine buffaloes. Genomics. 2020;112(3):2385–2392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Qu W, Obrycki JJ, et al. Optimizing sample size for population genomic study in a global invasive lady beetle, harmonia Axyridis. Insects. 2020;11(5):290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazareno AG, Bemmels JB, Dick CW, Lohmann LG. Minimum sample sizes for population genomics: an empirical study from an Amazonian plant species. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017;17(6):1136–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surya T, Vineeth MR, Sivalingam J, et al. Genomewide identification and annotation of SNPs in Bubalus bubalis. Genomics. 2019;111(6):1695–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayee N, Sahana G, Gajjar S, et al. Suitability of existing commercial single nucleotide polymorphism chips for genomic studies in Bos indicus cattle breeds and their Bos taurus crosses. J Anim Breed Genet. 2018;135(6):432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech B, Frąszczak M, Mielczarek M, Szyda J. Identification and annotation of breed-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms in Bos taurus genomes. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Jiang J, Yang S, et al. CNV discovery for milk composition traits in dairy cattle using whole genome resequencing. BMC Genom.. 2017;18(1):265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaglan K, Ravikumar D, Sukhija N, et al. Genomic clues of association between clinical mastitis and SNPs identified by ddRAD sequencing in Murrah buffaloes. Anim Biotechnol. 2023;1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2023.2165937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgul A, Miksza-Cybulska A, Szmatoła T, et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing performance in selected livestock species. Genomics. 2019;111(2):186–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Gan J, Fang D, et al. Genome-wide SNP discovery and evaluation of genetic diversity among six Chinese indigenous cattle breeds in Sichuan. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgul A, Żukowski K, Ślaska B, et al. General assessment of copy number variation in normal and tumor tissues of the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). J Appl Genet. 2014;55(3):353–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjödin P, Bataillon T, Schierup MH. Insertion and deletion processes in recent human history. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan C, Lu Z, Guo T, et al. A global analysis of CNVs in Chinese indigenous fine-wool sheep populations using whole-genome resequencing. BMC Genom.. 2021;22(1):78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malomane DK, Reimer C, Weigend S, Weigend A, Sharifi AR, Simianer H. Efficiency of different strategies to mitigate ascertainment bias when using SNP panels in diversity studies. BMC Genom. 2018;19(1):22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Utsunomiya YT, Pérez O'Brien AM, Sonstegard TS, Sölkner J, Garcia JF. Genomic data as the “hitchhiker’s guide” to cattle adaptation: tracking the milestones of past selection in the bovine genome. Front Genet. 2015;6:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewontin RC, Krakauer J. Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics. 1973;74(1):175–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoban S, Kelley JL, Lotterhos KE, et al. Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions. Am Nat. 2016;188(4):379–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciani E, Ciampolini R, D’Andrea M, et al. Analysis of genetic variability within and among Italian sheep breeds reveals population stratification and suggests the presence of a phylogeographic gradient. Small Rumin Res. 2013;112(1–3):21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfandyari H, Sørensen AC, Bijma P. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the VI International Congress of Genetics. 1:356–366.
   Google Scholar
• Nagylaki T. Fixation indices in subdivided populations. Genetics. 1998;148(3):1325–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafuzza NB, Zerlotini A, Lobo FP, et al. Single nucleotide variants and indels identified from whole-genome re-sequencing of Guzerat, Gyr, Girolando and Holstein cattle breeds. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Librado P, Der Sarkissian C, Ermini L, et al. Tracking the origins of Yakutian horses and the genetic basis for their fast adaptation to subarctic environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(50):E6889–E6897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscombe D, Helton TD, Xu W. L-type calcium channels: the low down. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(5):2633–2641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen LE, Hashimoto Y, Zanger K, Wondisford F, Radovick S. CREB-independent regulation by CBP is a novel mechanism of human growth hormone gene expression. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(8):1123–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiorano AM, Lourenco DL, Tsuruta S, et al. Assessing genetic architecture and signatures of selection of dual purpose Gir cattle populations using genomic information. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0200694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Yao Y, Ma P, Wang Q, Pan Y. Haplotype-based genome-wide association study identifies loci and candidate genes for milk yield in Holsteins. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito M, Yamanashi Y, Toyoda Y, et al. Disruption of Stard10 gene alters the PPARα-mediated bile acid homeostasis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1831(2):459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufner A, Thomas G. Ribosomal S6 kinase signaling and the control of translation. Exp Cell Res. 1999;253(1):100–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horuk R. Chemokine receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001;12(4):313–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goll DE, Thompson VF, Li H, Wei WEI, Cong J. The calpain system. Physiol Rev. 2003;83(3):731–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Botolin D, Christian B, Busik J, Xu J, Jump DB. Tissue-specific, nutritional, and developmental regulation of rat fatty acid elongases. J Lipid Res. 2005;46(4):706–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartee E, Mansouri M, Hovey Nerenberg BT, Gouveia K, Früh K. Downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I by human ubiquitin ligases related to viral immune evasion proteins. J Virol. 2004;78(3):1109–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F, McParland S, Kearney F, Du L, Berry DP. Detection of selection signatures in dairy and beef cattle using high-density genomic information. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47(1):49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaggi M, Du C, Zhang W, Balaji KC. Protein kinase D1: a protein of emerging translational interest. Front Biosci. 2007;12(8-12):3757–3767.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arvanitis C, Felsher DW. Conditional transgenic models define how MYC initiates and maintains tumorigenesis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006;16(4):313–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muramatsu M, Inoue S. Estrogen receptors: how do they control reproductive and nonreproductive functions? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;270(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty S, Ain R. Nitric-oxide synthase trafficking inducer is a pleiotropic regulator of endothelial cell function and signaling. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(16):6600–6620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche J, Malissen B, Mantovani A, De Baetselier P, Van Ginderachter JA. Regulation and function of the E-cadherin/catenin complex in cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage and DCs. J Am Soc Hematol Blood. 2012;119(7):1623–1633.
   Google Scholar
• Trinchieri G. Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(2):133–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliche S, Breitling D, Togni M, et al. The ADAP/SKAP55 signaling module regulates T-cell receptor-mediated integrin activation through plasma membrane targeting of Rap1. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(19):7130–7144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaishnav J, Khan F, Yadav M, et al. V-set domain containing T-cell activation inhibitor-1 (VTCN1): a potential target for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Immunobiology. 2022;227(6):152274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magnuson B, Ekim B, Fingar DC. Regulation and function of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) within mTOR signalling networks. Biochem J. 2012;441(1):1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubovsky JA, Chappell DL, Harrington BK, et al. Lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 is a chronic lymphocytic leukemia membrane-associated antigen critical to niche homing. J Am Soc Hematol Blood. 2013;122(19):3308–3316.
   Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Chan EC, Druey KM. R4 regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins in inflammation and immunity. AAPS J. 2016;18(2):294–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gately MK, Renzetti LM, Magram J, et al. The interleukin-12/interleukin-12-receptor system: role in normal and pathologic immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998;16(1):495–521.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duke-Cohan JS, Gu J, McLaughlin DF, Xu Y, Freeman GJ, Schlossman SF. Attractin (DPPT-L), a member of the CUB family of cell adhesion and guidance proteins, is secreted by activated human T lymphocytes and modulates immune cell interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(19):11336–11341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez A, Nagamani SCS, Lee B. Argininosuccinate lyase deficiency—Argininosuccinic aciduria and beyond. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(1):45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagane K, Sugimoto H, Akaike A. Biological characterization of ADAM22 variants reveals the importance of a disintegrin domain sequence in cell surface expression. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2010;30(2):72–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampinga HH, Craig EA. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(8):579–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei D, Sun Y. Small ring finger proteins RBX1 and RBX2 of SCF E3 ubiquitin ligases: the role in cancer and as cancer targets. Genes Cancer. 2010;1(7):700–707.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suto F, Murakami Y, Nakamura F, Goshima Y, Fujisawa H. Identification and characterization of a novel mouse plexin, plexin-A4. Mech Dev. 2003;120(3):385–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss JZ, Troncoso E, Djebbara Z, Vutskits L, Muller D. The role of neural cell adhesion molecules in plasticity and repair. Brain Res Rev. 2001;36(2–3):175–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixit SP, Singh S, Ganguly I, et al. Genome-wide runs of homozygosity revealed selection signatures in Bos indicus. Front Genet. 2020;11:92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv FH, Agha S, Kantanen J, et al. Adaptations to climate-mediated selective pressures in sheep. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(12):3324–3343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F. The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(2):629–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Marioni RE, Robinson MR, et al. Genotype effects contribute to variation in longitudinal methylome patterns in older people. Genome Med. 2018;10(1):75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vojtek AB, Der CJ. Increasing complexity of the Ras signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(32):19925–19928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink MY, Pincas H, Choi SG, Nudelman G, Sealfon SC. Research resource: gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor-mediated signaling network in LβT2 cells: a pathway-based web-accessible KnowledgeBase. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24(9):1863–1871.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claeys I, Simonet G, Poels J, et al. Insulin-related peptides and their conserved signal transduction pathway. Peptides. 2002;23(4):807–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cookson MR, Bandmann O. Parkinson’s disease: insights from pathways. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(R1):R21–R27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Qi F, Bai X, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals molecular convergence underlying domestication in 7 bird and mammals. BMC Genom.. 2020;21(1):204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar