Exploring aptamers for targeted enrichment of X sperm in bovine: unraveling selective potential

References

• Brito L, Vishwanath R, Heuer C, Evans K. Bovine sexed semen production and utilization. Clin Theriogenol. 2019;11:297–315.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury MMR, Lianguang X, Kong R, et al. In vitro production of sex preselected cattle embryos using a monoclonal antibody raised against bull sperm epitopes. Anim Reprod Sci. 2019;205:156–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhalakiya N, Haque N, Patel D, et al. Sperm sexing an its application in livestock sector. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7:259–272.
   Google Scholar
• Boro P, Naha BC, Madkar A, Prakash C. Sexing of semen in bulls: a mini review. Int J Appl Res. 2016;2(4):460–462.
   Google Scholar
• Holden SA, Butler ST. Review: Applications and benefits of sexed semen in dairy and beef herds. Animal. 2018;12(s1):s97–s103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahman MS, Pang MG. New biological insights on X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson LA. Sex preselection by flow cytometric separation of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm based on DNA difference: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7(4):893–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HX, Flaherty SP, Swann NJ, Matthews CD. Genetics: Discontinuous Percoll gradients enrich X- bearing human spermatozoa: a study using double-label fluorescence int-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(7):1265–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Zhu S, He X, et al. Application of a microfluidic sperm sorter to in vitro production of dairy cattle sex-sorted embryos. Theriogenology. 2016;85(7):1211–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Jolly DJ, Friedman T, Jones OW. Swimming behaviour of X and Y human sperm. Differentiation. 1984;27(2):120–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko S, Iizuka R, Oshio S, Nakajima H, Oshio S, Mohri H. Separation of human X- and Y-bearing sperm using free-flow electrophoresis. Proc Jpn Acad, Ser B. 1983;59(8):276–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Munster EB, Stap J, Hoebe RA, Te Meerman GJ, Aten JA. Difference in volume of X‐and Y‐chromosome‐bearing bovine sperm heads matches difference in DNA content. J Int Soc. 1999;35(2):125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Ollero M, Pérez‐pé R, Gargallo I, et al. Separation of ram spermatozoa bearing X and Y chromosome by centrifugal countercurrent distribution in an aqueous two‐phase system. J Androl. 2000;21(6):921–928.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe PC, Koo GC. Reacting mouse sperm with monoclonal HY antibodies does not influence sex ratio of eggs fertilized in vitro. J Reprod Immunol. 1984;6(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes EA, Miller NG, Dolby C, Hutchings A, Butcher GW, Jones R. A search for sex-specific antigens on bovine spermatozoa using immunological and biochemical techniques to compare the protein profiles of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm populations separated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. J Reprod Fertil. 1997;110(2):195–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yadav SK, Gangwar DK, Singh J, et al. An immunological approach of sperm sexing and different methods for identification of X- and Y-chromosome bearing sperm. Vet World. 2017;10(5):498–504. May
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joshi H, Mathur M, Mohanty A, et al. Semen sexing in bovine: current status and the need to develop alternative techniques. ARU. 2021; 1(1):17–31. 3
   Google Scholar
• Garner DL. Flow cytometric sexing of mammalian sperm. Theriogenology. 2006;65(5):943–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner DL, Evans KM, Seidel GE. Sex-sorting sperm using flow cytometry/cell sorting. In: Spermatogenesis. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2013:279–295.
   Google Scholar
• Garner DL, Gledhill BL, Pinkel D, et al. Quantification of the X-and Y-chromosome-bearing spermatozoa of domestic animals by flow cytometry. Biol Reprod. 1983;28(2):312–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zhu H, Wu C, et al. Identification of differentially expressed proteins between bull X and Y spermatozoa. J Proteomics. 2012;77:59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen D, Zhou C, Cao M, et al. Differential membrane protein profile in bovine X- and Y-sperm. J Proteome Res. 2021;20(6):3031–3042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umehara T, Tsujita N, Shimada M. Activation of Toll-like receptor 7/8 encoded by the X chromosome alters sperm motility and provides a novel simple technology for sexing sperm. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(8):e3000398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sringarm K, Thongkham M, Mekchay S, et al. High-efficiency bovine sperm sexing used magnetic-activated cell sorting by coupling scFv antibodies specific to Y-chromosome-bearing sperm on magnetic microbeads. Biology. 2022;11(5):715.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quelhas J, Santiago J, Matos B, Rocha A, Lopes G, Fardilha M. Bovine semen sexing: Sperm membrane proteomics as candidates for immunological selection of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm. Vet Med Sci. 2021;7(5):1633–1641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhm SJ, Heo YT, Yu DM, Kim DK, Gupta MK. Pre-implantation development of cattle embryos produced from fresh bull semen enriched for X-chromosome-bearing spermatozoa using a monoclonal antibody. Vet Res Commun. 2023;47(4):2101–2109. Published online July 11,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasena SD. Aptamers: an emerging class of molecules that rival antibodies in diagnostics. Clin Chem. 1999;45(9):1628–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairal T, Ozalp VC, Lozano Sánchez P, Mir M, Katakis I, O'Sullivan CK. Aptamers: molecular tools for analytical applications. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390(4):989–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlecht U, Malavé A, Gronewold T, Tewes M, Löhndorf M. Comparison of antibody and aptamer receptors for the specific detection of thrombin with a nanometer gap-sized impedance biosensor. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;573–574:65–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo KT, Ziemer G, Paul A, Wendel HP. CELL-SELEX: novel perspectives of aptamer-based therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci. 2008;9(4):668–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohuchi S. Cell-SELEX technology. Biores Open Access. 2012;1(6):265–272.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gooch J, Tungsirisurp S, Costanzo H, Napier R, Frascione N. Generating aptamers towards human sperm cells using massively parallel sequencing. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021;413(23):5821–5834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefah K, Shangguan D, Xiong X, O'Donoghue MB, Tan W. Development of DNA aptamers using Cell-SELEX. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(6):1169–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Hu Y, Deng S, et al. Engineering multivalence aptamer probes for amplified and label-free detection of antibiotics in aquatic products. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(8):2554–2561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich H, Magdesian MH, Alves MJ, Colli W. In vitro selection of RNA aptamers that bind to cell adhesion receptors of Trypanosoma cruzi and inhibit cell invasion. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(23):20756–20762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett JC, Rossi JJ. RNA-based therapeutics: current progress and future prospects. Chem Biol. 2012;19(1):60–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiviyanathan V, Gorenstein DG. Aptamers and the next generation of diagnostic reagents. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2012;6(11–12):563–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley AJ, Buhr M, Golovan SP. Development of sperm-specific aptamers to boar sperm. Ontario Swine Res Rev. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vinod SP, Vignesh R, Priyanka M, Tirumurugaan KG, Sivaselvam SN, Raj GD. Generation of single stranded DNA with selective affinity to bovine spermatozoa. Anim Biosci. 2021;34(10):1579–1589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carvalho O, Silva R, Sartori R, Dode MAN. Nanoscale differences in the size and shape of X and Y chromosome-bearing bovine sperm heads assessed by atomic force microscopy. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check JH, Shanis BS, Cooper SO, Bollendorf A. Male sex preselection: swim-up technique and insemination of women after ovulation induction. Arch Androl. 1989;23(2):165–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Yue Y, He Y, et al. Identification and characterization of genes differentially expressed in X and Y sperm using suppression subtractive hybridization and cDNA microarray. Mol Reprod Dev. 2014;81(10):908–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Canio M, Soggiu A, Piras C, et al. Differential protein profile in sexed bovine semen: shotgun proteomics investigation. Mol Biosyst. 2014;10(6):1264–1271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaur P, Saini G, Saharan P, Bisla A, Yadav V. Sex sorted semen-methods, constraints and future perspective. Vet Res Int. 2020;8:368–375.
   Google Scholar
• Umehara T, Tsujita N, Zhu Z, Ikedo M, Shimada M. A simple sperm-sexing method that activates TLR7/8 on X sperm for the efficient production of sexed mouse or cattle embryos. Nat Protoc. 2020;15(8):2645–2667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M, Cao XY, He QF, et al. Alkaline semen diluent combined with R848 for separation and enrichment of dairy goat X-sperm. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(12):10020–10032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez E, Moreno-Irusta A, Castex HR, et al. Sperm sexing mediated by magnetic nanoparticles in donkeys, a preliminary in vitro study. J Equine Vet Sci. 2018;65:123–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombelli S, Mascini M. Aptamers as molecular tools for bioanalytical methods. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2009;11(2):179–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devi S, Sharma N, Ahmed T, et al. Aptamer-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in animals: current potential and challenges. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(9):5081–5093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Chen Y, Han D, Ocsoy I, Tan W. Aptamers selected by cell-SELEX for application in cancer studies. Bioanalysis. 2010;2(5):907–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat P, Nosrati R, Alibolandi M, et al. SELEX methods on the road to protein targeting with nucleic acid aptamers. Biochimie. 2018;154:132–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Zhao Y, Feng W. Selection and characterization of DNA aptamers targeting hLCN6 protein for sperm capture. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2022;194(6):2565–2580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shraim AS, Abdel Majeed BA, Al-Binni MA, Hunaiti A. Therapeutic potential of aptamer-protein interactions. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2022;5(12):1211–1227. Published 2022 Nov 4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Afrasiabi S, Pourhajibagher M, Raoofian R, Tabarzad M, Bahador A. Therapeutic applications of nucleic acid aptamers in microbial infections. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27(1):6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolm C, Cervenka I, Aschl UJ, et al. DNA aptamers against bacterial cells can be efficiently selected by a SELEX process using state-of-the art qPCR and ultra-deep sequencing. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):20917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerchia L, Giangrande PH, McNamara JO, de Franciscis V. Cell-specific aptamers for targeted therapies. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;535:59–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shangguan D, Li Y, Tang Z, et al. From the cover: aptamers evolved from live cells as effective molecular probes for cancer study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(32):11838–11843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner DL, Jr, Seidel GE. Sexing bull sperm. In: Chenoweth PJ, ed. Topics in Bull Fertility. Ithaca: International Veterinary Information Service; 2000:10–12.
   Google Scholar