“Fathers’ Rights” Activism, Discourse, Groups and Impacts: Findings from a Scoping Review of the Literature

References

• Amato, P. R., Meyers, C. E., & Emery, R. E. (2009). Changes in nonresident father-child contact from 1976 to 2002. Family Relations; Minneapolis, 58(1), 41–53. doi:10.1111/fare.2009.58.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6, 7. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araji, S. K. (2012). Domestic violence, contested custody, and the courts: A review of findings from five studies with accompanying documentary. Sociological Perspectives; Thousand Oaks, 55(1), 3–15. doi:10.1525/sop.2012.55.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, A. (2015). “Like Gold Dust These Days”: Domestic violence fact-finding hearings in child contact cases. Feminist Legal Studies; Dordrecht, 23(1), 47–78. doi:10.1007/s10691-015-9278-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, N. (2003). The male way of mourning divorce: when, what, and how. Clinical Social Work Journal, 31(1), 37–50. doi:10.1023/A:1021462517875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, N. (2004). On helping divorced men to mourn their losses. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 58(2), 174–185. doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2004.58.4.430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertoia, C., & Drakich, J. (1993). The fathers’ rights movement: Contradictions in rhetoric and practice. Journal of Family Issues, 14(4), 592–615. doi:10.1177/019251393014004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoia, C. E. (1998). An interpretive analysis of the mediation rhetoric of fathers’ rightists: Privatization versus personalization. Mediation Quarterly, 16(1), 15–32. doi:10.1002/crq.3890160104
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R., & Bala, N. (2010). Toward the differentiation of high-conflict families: An analysis of social science research and canadian case law. Family Court Review, 48(3), 403–416. doi:10.1111/fcre.2010.48.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Blais, M., & Dupuis-Déri, F. (2012). Masculinism and the antifeminist countermovement. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 21–39. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.640532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, S. B. (2006). “Robbed of their Families” fathers’ rights discources in canadian parenting law reform processes. In R. Collier & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Fathers’ rights activism and law reform in comparative perspective (pp. 27–52). London: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, M. (2016). Fathers’ rights in Swedish family law reform: Taking account of fathers’ violence against mothers. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 28(1), 152–181. doi:10.3138/cjwl.28.1.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, R., Morgan, M., & Coombes, L. (2014). Manufacturing egalitarian injustice: A discursive analysis of the rhetorical strategies used in fathers’ rights websites in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Feminism & Psychology, 24(4), 440–460. doi:10.1177/0959353514539649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannold, L. (2008). Who’s the father? Rethinking the moral “crime” of “paternity fraud.”. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31(4), 249–256. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2008.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapton, D. G. (2009). How and why social work fails fathers: Redressing an imbalance, social work’s role and responsibility. Practice, 21(1), 17–34. doi:10.1080/09503150902745989
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (1996). “Coming Together?”: Post-heterosexuality, masculine crisis and the new men’s movement. Feminist Legal Studies, 4(1), 3–48. doi:10.1007/BF02167601
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (2006). “The Out Law Fathers” fight back’: Fathers rights groups, fathers 4 justice and the politics of family law reform - reflections on the UK expirience. In R. Collier & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Fathers’ rights activism and law reform in comparative perspective (pp. 53–78). London: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (2009). Fathers’ rights, gender and welfare: Some questions for family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31(4), 357–371.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (2014). Men, gender and fathers’ rights “after legal equality”: New formations of rights and responsibility in family justice. In R. Leckey (Ed.), After legal equality: Family, sex, kinship (pp. 59–76). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (2015). On reading men, law and gender: Legal regulation and the new politics of masculinity. In S. Horlacher (Ed.), Configuring masculinity in theory and literary practice (pp. 53–74). London, UK: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R., & Sheldon, S. (2006).Fathers’ rights fatherhood and law reform. In R. Collier & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Fathers’ rights activism and law reform in comparative perspective (pp. 1-26). London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Coltrane, S., & Hickman, N. (1992). The rhetoric of rights and needs: Moral discourse in the reform of child custody and child support laws. Social Problems, 39(4), 400–420. doi:10.2307/3097018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2012). Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), 1675–1683. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, J. E. (2006a). Adopting equality tools for the toolboxes of their predecessors: The fathers’ rights movement in the United States. In R. Collier & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Fathers’ rights activism and law reform in comparative perspective (pp. 53–78). London, UK: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, J. E. (2006b). Organizational responses to the fatherhood crisis. Marriage and Family Review, 39(1–2), 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, J. E. (2008a). Defiant dads: Fathers’ rights activists in America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, J. E. (2008b). On the cusp of a movement: Identity work and social movement identification process within fathers’ rights. Sociological Spectrum, 28(6), 705–724. doi:10.1080/02732170802342974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, J. E. (2009). Taking custody of motherhood: Fathers’ rights activists and the politics of parenting. Women’s Studies Quarterly; New York, 37(3/4), 223–240.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, J. E. (2010). Fathers’ rights groups, domestic violence and political countermobilization. Social Forces, 88(2), 723–756. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devreux, A.-M. (2007). “New Fatherhood” in practice: Domestic and parental work performed by men in France and in the Netherlands. Journal of Comparative Family Studies; Calgary, 38(1), 87–X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F., & Erickson, M. F. (1998). Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family; Minneapolis, 60(2), 277–292. doi:10.2307/353848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragiewicz, M. (2008). Patriarchy reasserted: Fathers’ rights and anti-VAWA activism. Feminist Criminology; Thousand Oaks, 3(2), 121–144. doi:10.1177/1557085108316731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragiewicz, M. (2010). A left realist approach to antifeminist fathers’ rights groups. Crime, Law and Social Change, 54(2), 197–212. doi:10.1007/s10611-010-9253-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragiewicz, M. (2011). Equality with a vengeance: Men’s rights groups, battered women, and antifeminist backlash. Boston: UPNE.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, V. (2010). Turning mothers into villains: Gaps and silences in media accounts of custody abductions. Feminist Media Studies, 10(1), 51–67. doi:10.1080/14680770903457105
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, V., Gavey, N., & Tolmie, J. (2012). The gendered dynamics of power in disputes over the postseparation care of children. Violence Against Women, 18(4), 459–481. doi:10.1177/1077801212452049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., & Hester, M. (2001). Violent men as good-enough fathers?: A look at England and Sweden. Violence Against Women; Thousand Oaks, 7(7), 779–798. doi:10.1177/10778010122182730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., & Pringle, K. (2006). Gender equality child welfare and fathers’ rights in Sweden. In R. Collier & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Fathers’ rights activism and law reform in comparative perspective (pp. 101–124). London: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, S. (2009). Backlash: The undeclared war against american women. New York: Crown/Archetype.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, R. L. (2002). Gaining access to one’s children: An evaluation of a visitation program for noncustodial parents. Families in Society; Milwaukee, 83(2), 163–174. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2004). Backlash: Angry men’s movements. In S. E. Rossi (Ed.), The battle and backlash rage on: Why feminism cannot be obsolete (pp. 261–278). Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2010). “Fathers’ Rights” and the defense of paternal authority in Australia. Violence Against Women, 16(3), 328–347. doi:10.1177/1077801209360918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2012). Separated fathers and the ‘fathers’ rights’ movement. Journal of Family Studies, 18(2–3), 235–345. doi:10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatrell, C. (2007). Whose child is it anyway? the negotiation of paternal entitlements within marriage. Sociological Review, 55(2), 352–372. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00709.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graycar, R. (2012). Family law reform in Australia, or frozen chooks revisited again? Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1), 241–269. doi:10.1515/1565-3404.1291
   Google Scholar
• Harris-Short, S. (2010). Resisting the march towards 50/50 shared residence: Rights, welfare and equality in post-separation families. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 32(3), 257–274. doi:10.1080/09649069.2010.520519
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• I-Fen, L., & McLanahan, S. S. (2007). Parental beliefs about nonresident fathers’ obligations and rights. Journal of Marriage and Family; Minneapolis, 69(2), 382–398. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, P. G., & Crooks, C. V. (2004). Partner violence and child custody cases: A cross-national comparison of legal reforms and issues. Violence Against Women, 10(8), 917–934. doi:10.1177/1077801204266447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. (2009). ‘Dads aren’t Demons. Mums aren’t Madonnas.’ Constructions of fatherhood and masculinities in the (real) fathers 4 justice campaign. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31(4), 419–433.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. (2014). “Every Father is a Superhero to His Children”: The gendered politics of the (real) fathers 4 justice campaign. Political Studies, 62(1), 83–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.01008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. (2016). Conceptualizing Backlash: (UK) men’s rights groups, anti-feminism, and postfeminism. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 28(1), 18–44. doi:10.3138/cjwl.28.1.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, M., & Tolmie, J. (1998). Discoursing dads: The rhetorical devices of fathers’ rights groups critique and comment. Melbourne University Law Review, 22, 162–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kenedy, R. A. (2006). Researching the Intersection between collective identity and conceptions of post-separation and divorced fatherhood: A case study. Fathers for justice, fathers for just us, or fathers are us?. Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(2), 75-97.
   Google Scholar
• Khader, S. J. (2008). When equality justifies women’s subjection: Luce irigaray’s critique of equality and the fathers’ rights movement. Hypatia, 23(4), 48–74. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01433.x
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (2017). Angry white men: American masculinity at the end of an Era. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Koodziej-Zaleska, A., & Przybya-Basista, H. (2016). Psychological well-being of individuals after divorce: The role of social support. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 4(4), 206–216. doi:10.5114/cipp.2016.62940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruk, E. (1992). Child custody determination: An analysis of the litigation model, legal practices, and men’s experiences in the process. Journal of Men’s Studies; Thousand Oaks, 1(2), 163. doi:10.3149/jms.0102.163
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, J. (2004). Key determinants of mothers’ decisions to allow visits with non-custodial fathers. Fathering; Harriman, 2(2), 131. doi:10.3149/fth.0202.131
   Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A., & Mills, L. G. (2003). Fighting for child custody when domestic violence is at issue: Survey of state laws. Social Work, 48(4), 463–470. doi:10.1093/sw/48.4.463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagelow, M. D. (1993). Justice for victims of spouse abuse in divorce and child custody cases. Violence and Victims, 8(1), 69–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petren, R. E., Ferraro, A. J., Davis, T. R., & Pasley, K. (2017). Factors linked with coparenting support and conflict after divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 58(3), 145–160. doi:10.1080/10502556.2017.1300013
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L., Hester, M., Humphries, J., & Woodfield, K.-S. (1997). For the sake of the children: The law, domestic violence and child contact in England. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(4), 471–482. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00036-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane, T. R., & McBride, B. A. (2000). Identity theory as a guide to understanding fathers’ involvement with their children. Journal of Family Issues, 21(3), 347–366. doi:10.1177/019251300021003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, K., Lucier-Greer, M., & Parker, T. S. (2016). Exploring parental divorce among emerging adult women: The roles of support networks and family relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(3), 231–241.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, E. A., Zeoli, A. M., & Sullivan, C. M. (2012). Abused mothers’ safety concerns and court mediators’ custody recommendations. Journal of Family Violence; New York, 27(4), 321–332. doi:10.1007/s10896-012-9426-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, L. (2009). Fathers’ rights groups. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 513–531. doi:10.1177/1077801209331409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, M., Birnbaum, R., Bala, N., & McLarty, B. (2016). Understanding pathways to family dispute resolution and justice reforms: Ontario court file analysis & survey of professionals. Family Court Review, 54(3), 382–397. doi:10.1111/fcre.12236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (2004). Equal shares: Rights for fathers or recognition for children? Critical Social Policy, 24(4), 484–503. doi:10.1177/0261018304046673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, K. (1999). Reasserting fathers’ rights? Parental responsibility and involvement in education and lone mother families in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies, 7(1), 33–46. doi:10.1023/A:1009281402009
   Google Scholar
• Wallbank, J. (2007). Getting tough on mothers: Regulating contact and residence. Feminist Legal Studies; Dordrecht, 15(2), 189–222. doi:10.1007/s10691-007-9056-z
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, S. E. (2016). Predicting adjustment to divorce from social support and relational quality in multiple relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 57(8), 553–572. doi:10.1080/10502556.2016.1233844
   Google Scholar