A brief Dutch language Impact Message Inventory–Circumplex (IMI-C Short) using non-parametric item response theory

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 4th ed., text rev.). Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. Z., Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1997). Examining the invariance of Holland's vocational interest model across sex. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 349–364. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R. C. (1996). Seamlessness in personality and its derangements. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 240–247. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantino, M. J., Laws, H. B., Arnow, B. A., Klein, D. N., Rothbaum, B. O., & Manber, R. (2012). The relation between changes in patients’ interpersonal impact messages and outcome in treatment for chronic depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 354–364. doi:10.1037/a0028351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E. (1996). The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 8, 341–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hafkenscheid, A. (2003). Objective countertransference: do patients’ interpersonal impacts generalise across therapists? Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10, 31–40. doi:10.1002/cpp.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafkenscheid, A. (2012). Assessing ‘objective’ countertransference with a computer-delivered Impact Message Inventory (IMI-C). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19, 37–45. doi:10.1002/cpp.734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafkenscheid, A., & Kiesler, D. (2007). Assessing objective countertransference: a comparison of two different statistical procedures in three different samples. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 393–403. doi:10.1080/10503300600702323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafkenscheid, A., & Rouckhout, D. (2009). Circumplex structure of the Impact Message Inventory (IMI-C): An empirical test with the Dutch version. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 187–194. doi:10.1080/00223890802634340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafkenscheid, A., & Rouckhout, D. (2013). The Impact Message Inventory (IMI-C): a replication study of its circumplex structure in a Dutch sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 417–422. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.765883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, R. L., & Rogers, D. T. (2012). The IIS–32: A Brief Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths, Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 638–646. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.681818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtforth, M., Altenstein, D., Ansell, E., Schneider, C., & Caspar, F. (2012). Impact messages of depressed outpatients as perceived by their significant others: Profiles, therapeutic change, and relationship to outcome. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 319–333. doi:10.1002/jclp.20854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172–178. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal transaction circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human processes. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 421–430.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, D. J. (1988). Therapeutic metacommunication: Therapist impact disclosure as feedback in psychotherapy. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (1993). The Impact Message Inventory: Form IIA Octant Scale Version. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2006). The Impact Message Inventory – Circumplex (IMI-C) Manual: sampler set, manual, test booklet, scoring key, work sheets. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, J. P. (2006). Treating chronic depression with disciplined personal involvement: Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, R. R., & Baneke, J. J. (2004). Analyzing psychopathology items: A case for nonparametric item response theory modeling. Psychological Methods, 9, 354–368. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay, J. O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika, 56, 611–630. doi:10.1007/BF02294494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay, J. O. (2000). TestGraf. A program for the graphical analysis of multiple-choice tests and questionnaire data [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved from http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/faculty/ramsay/ramsay.html
   Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., & Henson, J. M. (2003). A discussion of modern versus traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 93–103. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberson-Nay, R., Strong, D. R., Nay, W. T., Beidel, D. C., & Turner, S. M. (2007). Development of an abbreviated Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory (SPAI) using item response theory: The SPAI-23. Psychological Assessment, 19, 133–145. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounds, J. B., Tracey, T. J., & Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239–259. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(92)90073-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santor, D. A., & Coyne, J. C. (2001). Examining symptom expression as a function of symptom severity: Item performance on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Psychological Assessment, 13, 127–139. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santor, D. A., & Ramsay, J. O. (1998). Progress in the technology of measurement: Application of item response models. Psychological Assessment, 10, 345–359. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.4.345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. A., Wagner, C. C., & Kiesler, D. J. (1999). Psychometric and circumplex properties of the octant scale Impact Message Inventory (IMI-C): A structural evaluation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 325–334. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.46.3.325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. L., & Reise, S. P. (1998). Gender differences on negative affectivity: An IRT study of differential item functioning on the multidimensional personality questionnaire stress reaction scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1350–1362. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodano, S. M., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2011). A brief Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex using non-parametric Item Response Theory: Introducing the IIP-C-IRT. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 62–75. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.528482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, T. J. G. (1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for the randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164–168. doi:10.1177/0013164497057001012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar