Psychometric properties of the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2: The Norwegian version in an international context

References

• Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beretvas, S., Kearney, L., & Barón, A. (2003). A shortened form of the Outcome Questionnaire: A validation of scores across ethnic groups. Published on line by the Counseling and Mind Health Centte of Texas University.
   Google Scholar
• Bhugra, D., & Bhui, K. (2007). Textbook of cultural psychiatry: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhugra, D., Gupta, S., Bhui, K., Craig, T., Dogra, N., Ingleby, J. D., .… Qureshi, A. (2011). WPA guidance on mental health and mental health care in migrants. World Psychiatry, 10, 2–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bludworth, J. L., Tracey, T. J. G., & Glidden-Tracey, C. (2010). The bilevel structure of the Outcome Questionnaire–45. Psychological Assessment, 22, 350–355. doi:10.1037/a0019187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B.M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications and programming. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. E. (2003). Reliability and validity of the progress questionnaire: an adaptation of the outcome questionnaire. Drexel University.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappelli, M., Lo Coco, G., Gullo, S., Bensi, L., & Prestano, C. (2008). The Outcome Questionnaire 45.2. Italian validation of an instrument for the assessment of phychological treatments. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 17, 152–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, K., Nugter, M. A., Polak, M. G., Wagenborg, J. E. A., Spinhoven, P., & Heiser, W. J. (2007). The Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) in a Dutch population: A cross-cultural validation. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14, 288–301. doi:10.1002/cpp.529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, M. A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 464–474. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.673023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis, L. (1994). SCL-90-R Symptom Checklist-90-R administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90–R: Administration, scoring and procedures Manual I for the revised version of other instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale series. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 3, 595–605. doi:10.1017/S0033291700048017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. W., Yarvis, R. M., Mueller, D. P., Zingale, H. C., & Wagman, W. J. (1978). Test-taking and the stability of adjustment scales: Can we assess patient deterioration? Evaluation Review, 2, 275–291. doi:10.1177/0193841X7800200206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. M.-C., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J., & McGrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 247–255. doi:10.1080/713680250
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, F. M., Pathak, D., & Mitchell, T. (1988). Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 260–322. doi:10.1097/00005053-198805000-00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, N. B., & Lambert, M. J. (2003). An evaluation of the dose–response relationship in naturalistic treatment settings using survival analysis. Mental Health Services Research, 5, 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1021751307358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen, N. B., Lambert, M. J., & Forman, E. M. (2002). The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 329–343. doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, S. C., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. M., Hawkins, E., Nielsen, S. L., Slade, K., & Lutz, W. (2007). Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist–client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 379–392. doi:10.1080/10503300600702331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, D. R., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 485–491. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.35.5.485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Slade, K. L., & Tuttle, K. C. (2004). The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 308–327. doi:10.1093/ptr/kph027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, L., Alden, L., Wiggins, J., & Pincus, A. (2000). IIP-64/IIP-32 professional manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885–892. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL: Technical report. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: The SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., Beretvas, S. N., & Sherry, A. R. (2010). A validation of the factor structure of OQ-45 scores using factor mixture modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 275–295. doi:10.1177/0748175609354616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J. (1983). The assessment of psychotherapy outcome: New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J. (2013). Efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 169–218). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M.J., & Ogles, B. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (pp. 139–193): Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C., & Yanchar, S. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 3, 249–258. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199612)3:4<249::AID-CPP106>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Hannöver, W., Nisslmüller, K., Richard, M., & Kordy, H. (2002). Fragebogen zum Ergebnis von Psychotherapie. Zeitschrift für klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 40–46. doi:10.1026//1616-3443.31.1.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M.J., Kahler, M., Harmon, C., & Burlingame, G. M. (2011). Administration and Scoring Manual Outcome Questionnaire OQ-45.2. OQ Measures L.L.C.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., & Shimokawa, K. (2011). Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy, 48, 72–79. doi:10.1037/a0022238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Hawkins, E. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Smart, D. W. (2003). Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 288–301. doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., & Nielsen, S. L. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced?Psychotherapy Research, 11, 49–68. doi:10.1080/713663852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J., Vermeersch, D., Smart, D., Hawkins, E., Nielsen, S., & Goates, M. (2002). Providing therapists with feedback on patient progress as a method of enhancing psychotherapy outcomes: A replication. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 91–103. doi:10.1002/cpp.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Coco, G., Chiappelli, M., Bensi, L., Gullo, S., Prestano, C., & Lambert, M. (2008). The factorial structure of the outcome questionnaire-45: A study with an Italian sample. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15, 418–423. doi:10.1002/cpp.601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D., & Duncan, B. (2000). The Outcome Rating Scale. Retrieved from http://www.talkingcure.com/measures.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Monsen, J. T., Hagtvet, K. A., Havik, O. E., & Eilertsen, D. E. (2006). Circumplex structure and personality disorder correlates of the Interpersonal Problems Model (IIP-C): Construct validity and clinical implications. Psychological Assessment, 18, 165–173. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, R. M., Lambert, M. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (1998). Construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 248–262. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Economics Foundation. (2012). The Happy Planet Index: 2012 Report: A global index of sustainable well-being. Retrieved July 15, 2013, from http://www.happyplanetindex.org/assets/happy-planet-index-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, G. A. (2002). Revised Norwegian version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems—Circumplex (IIP-C). Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening,39, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, G., & Karterud, S. (2004). Is SCL-90R helpful for the clinician in assessing DSM-IV symptom disorders?Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110, 215–224. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00321.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsof, W. M., Zinbarg, R. E., Lebow, J. L., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Durbin, E., Chambers, A., … Friedman, G. (2009). Laying the foundation for progress research in family, couple, and individual therapy: The development and psychometric features of the initial Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 143–156. doi:10.1080/10503300802669973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Y.-F., & Hu, S.-J. (2008). Usability report of Outcome Questionnaire-45 in part of Chinese sample. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 138–140.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1990). Model conditions for asymptotic robustness in the analysis of linear relations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10, 235–249. doi:10.1016/0167-9473(90)90004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D., & Jöreskog, K. (1999). PRELIS 2: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Umphress, V. J., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. W., Barlow, S. H., & Clouse, G. (1997). Concurrent and construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 40–55. doi:10.1177/073428299701500104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassend, O., Lian, L., & Andersen, H. T. (1992). Norwegian versions of the NEO-Personality Inventory, Symptom Checklist 90 Revised, and Giessen Subjective Complaints List. I. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 29, 1150–1160.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeersch, D. A., Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Hawkins, E. J., Burchfield, C. M., & Okiishi, J. C. (2004). Outcome questionnaire: Is it sensitive to changes in counseling center clients?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 38–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman, M. M., & Bothwell, S. (1976). Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33(9), 1111–1115. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennberg, P., Philips, B., & de Jong, K. (2010). The Swedish version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): Reliability and factor structure in a substance abuse sample. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 83, 325–329. doi:10.1348/147608309X478715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 59–68. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar