Accuracy of therapist perceptions of patients' alliance: Exploring the divergence

References

• Alexander, & Luborsky, L. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In L. S. Greenberg & W. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325–366). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelor, A. (2013). Clients' and therapists' views of the therapeutic alliance: Similarities, differences and relationship to therapy outcome. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 20(2), 118–135. doi:10.1002/cpp.792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassler, M., Potratz, B., & Krauthauser, H. (1995). Der “Helping Alliance Questionnaire” (HAQ) von Luborsky [The “Helping Alliance Questionnaire” (HAQ) of Luborsky]. Psychotherapeut, 40, 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16, 252–260. doi:10.1037/h0085885
   Google Scholar
• Crits-Christoph, P., Johnson, J. E., Connolly Gibbons, M. B., & Gallop, R. (2013). Process predictors of the outcome of group drug counseling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(1), 23–34. doi:10.1037/a0030101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. R., Iwakabe, S., & Stalikas, A. (2005). Perspective divergence in the working alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 15(1–2), 69–80. doi:10.1080/10503300512331327056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., Symonds, D., & Horvath, A. O. (2012). How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(1), 10–17. doi:10.1037/a0025749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, J. D. (1993). Persuasion and healing: A comparative study of psychotherapy (3rd. ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1912). Zur Dynamik der Übertragung [The dynamics of transference]. Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, 2, 167–173.
   Google Scholar
• Gelso, C. J. (2009). The time has come: The real relationship in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 278–282. doi:10.1080/10503300902777155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafkenscheid, A. (2009). The impact of psychotherapy sessions: Internal structure of the Dutch Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ). Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 82(1), 99–111. doi:10.1348/147608308X380750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., Leonhart, R., Hermann, S., Joos, A., Stiles, W. B., & Zeeck, A. (2013). Die Evaluation von Therapiesitzungen durch Patienten und Therapeuten: Faktorstruktur und Interpretation des SEQ-D [Patients' and therapists' evaluations of therapy sessions: Factor structure and interpretation of the SEQ-D]. Diagnostica, 59(1), 45–59. doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., Orlinsky, D. E., Geller, J. D., & Zeeck, A. (2003). Der Inter-Session-Fragebogen (ISF) - Ein Instrument zur Erfassung von psychotherapierelevanten Prozessen zwischen Sitzungen [The Intersession Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) - A measure for therapy related processes between sessions]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 53, 464–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., Orlinsky, D. E., Weber, S., Sandholz, A., & Zeeck, A. (2010). Session and intersession experience related to treatment outcome in bulimia nervosa. Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/Practice/Training, 47, 355–370. doi:10.1037/a0021166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., Orlinsky, D. E., & Zeeck, A. (2011). The structure of intersession experience in psychotherapy and its relation to the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 1044–1063. doi:10.1002/jclp.20826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., Schröder, T., Orlinsky, D. E., & Zeeck, A. (2010, June 25). Psychometric properties and application of the Therapist Work Involvement Scales: A short form of the Development of Psychotherapists Common Core Questionnaire. Paper presented at the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 41st International Meeting, Asilomar, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriksen, M., Van, R., Peen, J., Oudejans, S., Schoevers, R., & Dekker, J. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Helping Alliance Questionnaire-I in psychodynamic psychotherapy for major depression. Psychotherapy Research, 20, 589–598. doi:10.1080/10503307.2010.493539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16. doi:10.1037/a0022186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S., & Lutz, W. (2009). Process transforms inputs to determine outcomes: Therapists are responsible for managing process. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 16(1), 73–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, R. D., & Weems, C. F. (2011). The equivalence of regression models using difference scores and models using separate scores for each informant: Implications for the study of informant discrepancies. Psychological Assessment, 23, 388–397. doi:10.1037/a0021926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J. (2010). Prevention of treatment failure: The use of measuring monitoring, and feedback in clinical practice (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., Barber, J. P., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1990). Theory-based research for understanding the process of dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Special Series: Advances in Psychotherapy Process Research, 58, 281–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmarosh, C. L., & Kivlighan, D. M. J. (2012). Relationships among client and counselor agreement about the working alliance, session evaluations, and change in client symptoms using response surface analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 352–367. doi:10.1037/a0028907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen-Lie, H. A., Monsen, J. T., & Rønnestad, M. H. (2010). Therapist predictors of early patient-rated working alliance: A multilevel approach. Psychotherapy Research, 20, 627–646. doi:10.1080/10503307.2010.497633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E. (2008). Die psychotherapeutische Beziehung, Soziale Unterstützung und die Heilende Energie des Therapeuten: Eine Neo-Durkheim'sche Perspektive. [The therapeutic relationship, social support, and the psychotherapist's healing energy: A neo-Durkheimian perspective]. In B. Röhrle & A-R. Laireiter (Eds.), Soziale Unterstützung und Psychotherapie. [Social support and psychotherapy.] Tübingen: dgvt-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E. (2010). The “Generic Model of Psychotherapy” after 25 years: Evolution of a research-based metatheory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 19, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., Ambühl, H., Rønnestad, M., Davis, J., Gerin, P., Davis, M., … SPR Collaborative Research Network. (1999). Development of psychotherapists: concepts, questions, and methods of a collaborative international study. Psychotherapy Research, 9(2), 127–153. doi:10.1080/10503309912331332651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., & Geller, J. D. (1993). Patients' representations of their therapists and therapy: New measures. Psychodynamic treatment research: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 423–466). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1975). Varieties of psychotherapeutic experience: Multivariate analyses of patients' and therapists' reports. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1977). The therapist's experience of psychotherapy. In A. Gurman & A. Razin, Eds., Effective psychotherapy: A handbook of research. New York, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1986). Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin, Eds., Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (3rd ed., pp. 311–381). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., & Rønnestad, M. H. (2005). How psychotherapists develop: A study of therapeutic work and professional growth. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., Rønnestad, M. H., & Willutzki, U. (2004). Fifty years of psychotherapy process - outcome research: Continuity and change. In M. J. Lambert & D. R. Dupper (Eds.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 307–390). New York, NY: Wiley John + Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E., Willutzki, U., Meyerberg, J., Cierpka, M., Buchheim, P., Ambühl, H., & SPR-Collaborative Research Network. (1996). Die Qualität der therapeutischen Beziehung: Entsprechen gemeinsame Faktoren in der Psychotherapie gemeinsamen Charakteristika von PsychotherapeutInnen? Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 46(3–4), 102–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103. doi:10.1037/h0045357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safran, J. D. & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2011). Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy, 48, 80–87. doi:10.1037/a0022140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. (2009). JMP® 8 User Guide (Vol. 8). Cary, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W., Reynolds, S., Hardy, G., Rees, A., Barkham, M., & Shapiro, D. (1994). Evaluation and description of psychotherapy sessions by clients using the Session Evaluation Questionnaire and the Session Impacts Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B., Gordon, L. E., & Lani, J. A. (2002). Session evaluation and the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. In G. S. Tyron (Ed.), Counseling based on process research: Applying what we know (pp. 325–243). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Difference scores from the point of view of reliability and repeated-measures ANOVA: In defense of difference scores for data analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(1), 37–43. doi:10.1177/0013164411409929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryon, G. S., Blackwell, S. C., & Hammel, E. F. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of client–therapist perspectives of the working alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 629–642. doi:10.1080/10503300701320611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeck, A., Hartmann, A., & Orlinsky, D. E. (2004). Inter-Session-Prozesse. Ein vernachlässigtes Thema der Psychotherapieforschung [Intersession processes: A neglected field of psychotherapy research]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 54, 236–242. doi:10.1055/s-2003-814790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeck, A., Herzog, T., Kuhn, K., Hartmann, A., Scheidt, C., & Wirsching, M. (2002). Teilstationäre Psychotherapie: Settingbesonderheiten und Indikationsstellung am Beispiel der Freiburger Tagesklinik [Day clinic psychotherapy: Setting and indications using the example of the Freiburg Dayclinic]. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 52, 492–499. doi:10.1055/s-2002-36007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeck, A., Orlinsky, D. E., Hermann, S., Joos, A., Wirsching, M., Weidmann, W., & Hartmann, A. (2012). Stressful involvement in psychotherapeutic work: Therapist, client and process correlates. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 543–555. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.683345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar