Why do psychotherapists participate in psychotherapy research and why not? Results of the Attitudes to Psychotherapy Research Questionnaire with a sample of experienced German psychotherapists

References

• Bednar, R. L., & Shapiro, J. G. (1970). Professional research commitment: A symptom or a syndrome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 323–326. doi:10.1037/h0029339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühner, M. (2006). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Introduction to test and questionaire construction] ( 2., aktualisierte Auflage). München: Pearson Studium.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, F. N., Milrod, B. L., Rudden, M., Shapiro, T., Roiphe, J., Singer, M., & Aronson, A. (2001). How treating psychoanalysts respond to psychotherapy research constraints. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49, 961–983. doi:10.1177/00030651010490030601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. H. (1979). The research readership and information source reliance of clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology 10, 780–785. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.10.6.780
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., & Morrow-Bradley, C. (1994). Developing a working marriage between psychotherapists and psychotherapy researchers: Identifying shared purposes. In P. F. Talley, H. H. Strupp, & S. F. Butler, (Eds.), Psychotherapy research and practice. Bridging the gap (pp. 124–142). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Felber, M., & Margreiter, U. (2007). Einstellung von Psychotherapeut(inn)en zu Psychotherapieforschung [Attitudes of psychotherapists to psychotherapy research]. Psychotherapie Forum, 15, 192–196. doi:10.1007/s00729-007-0214-1
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jüttemann, G. (2009). Komparative Kasuistik. Die psychologische Analyse spezifischer Entwicklungsphänomene [Comparative casuistic. The psychological analysis of specific developmental phenomena]. Lengerich: Pabst.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2008). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis. Basics and techniques]. Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow-Bradley, C., & Elliott, R. (1986). Utilization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists. American Psychologist, 41, 188–197. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.2.188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396–402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (1983). Contemporary psychotherapists: A national survey of characteristics, practices, orientations, and attitudes. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20, 161–173. doi:10.1037/h0088487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protz, J., Kächele, H., & Taubner, S. (2012). Die Ambivalenz mit der Therapieforschung – Beweggründe und Erfahrungen von Psychoanalytikerinnen und Psychoanalytikern [Ambivalence with psychotherapy research. Attitudes and experiences from psychoanalysts]. Forum der Psychoanalyse, 28, 67–88. doi:10.1007/s00451-011-0081-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, J., & Luborsky, L. (1998). Who's afraid of psychoanalytic research? Analysts attitudes towards reading clinical versus empirical research papers. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 965–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talley, P. F., Strupp, H. H., & Beutler, S. F. (Ed.). (1994). Psychotherapy research and practice. Bridging the gap. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Taubner, S., Buchheim, A., Rudyk, R., Kächele, H., & Bruns, G. (2012). How does biological research influence psychoanalytic treatments? Observations from the Hanse-Neuro-Psychoanalysis-Study. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 269–286. doi:10.1057/ajp.2012.17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thurin, J.-M., Thurin, M., & Midgley, N. (2012). Does participation in research lead to changes in attitudes among clinicians? Report on a survey of those involved in a French practice research network. Counseling and Psychotherapy Research, 12, 187–193. doi:10.1080/14733145.2012.696122
   Google Scholar
• Vachon, D. O., Susman, M., Wynne, M. E., Birringer, J., O lshefsky, L., & Cox, K. (1995). Reasons therapists give for refusing to participate in psychotherapy process research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 380–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, S. C., Marshall, R. D., Mackinnon, R. A., Vaughan, R., Mellman, L., & Roose, S. P. (2000). Can we do psychoanalytic outcome research? A feasibility study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 513–527. doi:10.1516/0020757001599933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C. H., & Richards, J. C. (1968). Psychotherapy research: Inertia, recruitment, and national policy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 1712–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, M. E., Susman, M., Ries, S., Birringer, J., & Katz, L. (1994). A method for assessing therapists’ recall of in-session events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(1), 53–57. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.41.1.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar