Effect size calculation in meta-analyses of psychotherapy outcome research

References

• Becker, B. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257–278. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1988.tb00901.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 221–235). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2013). Comprenensive meta-analysis (computer software), Version 3. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. D., & Schmidt, F. L. (1999). Impact of experimental design on effect size: Findings from the research literature on training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 851–862. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.84.6.851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2013). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Del Re, A. C., & Hoyt, W. T. (2014). MAd: Meta-analysis with mean differences. R-package version 0.8-2 (computer software). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MAd
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L, & Berlin, J. A. (2009). Effect sizes for dichotomous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed, pp. 237–253). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V, McGaw, B, & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (1st ed., pp. 339–355). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (2009). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed, pp. 357–376). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. doi: 10.2307/1164588
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis (Vol. 20). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, W. T., & Del Re, A. C. (n.d.). Comparison of methods for aggregating dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, W. T., Del Re, A. C., & Larson, D. G. (2011). A new look at the evidence: Grief counseling is effective. 9th International Conference on Grief and Bereavement in Contemporary Society, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, L. M. (1989). Random sampling, randomization, and equivalence of contrasted groups in psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 131–137. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2647799 doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis. The American Psychologist, 48(12), 1181–1209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.12.1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., & Stuebing, K. K. (2014). Meta-analysis with complex research designs: Dealing with dependence from multiple measures and multiple group comparisons. Review of Educational Research, 84, 328–364. doi: 10.3102/0034654313500826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32(9), 752–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith, E, & Tipton, E. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 13–30. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, N. G., Hoyt, W. T., Kidwell, J. E. M., & Worthington, E. L. (2014). Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(1), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., & Ahn, H. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “All must have prizes”. Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), 203–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar