2,651
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INTRODUCTION

Considerations of how to conduct meta-analyses in psychological interventions

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 329-332 | Received 09 Jan 2018, Accepted 15 Jan 2018, Published online: 29 Jan 2018

References

  • Hoyt, W. T., & Del Re, A. C. (2018). Effect size calculation in meta-analyses of psychotherapy outcome research. Psychotherapy Research. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1405171
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Levitt, H. (in press). How to conduct a qualitative meta-analysis: Tailoring methods to meet research goals. Psychotherapy Research.
  • Munder, T., & Barth, J. (2018). Cochrane’s risk of bias tool in the context of psychotherapy outcome research. Psychotherapy Research. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1411628
  • Schwartze, D., Barkowski, S., Strauß, B., Knaevelsrud, C., & Rosendahl, J. (2018). Efficacy of group psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychotherapy Research. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1405168
  • Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760. doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.9.752
  • Spielmans, G. I., & Flückiger, C. (2018). Moderators in psychotherapy meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1422214
  • Swift, J. K., & Wampold, B. E. (2018). Inclusion and exclusion strategies for conducting meta-analyses. Psychotherapy Research. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1405169
  • Wampold, B. E., Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Yulish, N. E., Frost, N. D., Pace, B. T., … Hilsenroth, M. J. (2017). In pursuit of truth: A critical examination of meta-analyses of cognitive behavior therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 27, 14–32. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1249433
  • Westen, D., & Morrison, K. (2001). A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatments for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: An empirical examination of the status of empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(6), 875–899. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.6.875

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.