“I want to know what it is used for”: Clients’ perspectives on completing a routine outcome measure (ROM) while undergoing psychotherapy

References

• Barkham, M., Evans, C., Marginson McGrath, F., Mellor-Clark, J., Milne, D., & Connell Graeme, J. (1998). The rationale for developing and outcome batteries for routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research implementing core. Journal of Mental Health, 7(1), 35–47. doi: 10.1080/09638239818328
   Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., … McGrath, G. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 184–196. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.69.2.184 doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2003). Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: Developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10(6), 319–327. doi: 10.1002/cpp.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Connell, J., & Cahill, J. (2006). A core approach to practice-based evidence: A brief history of the origins and applications of the CORE-OM and CORE system. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 6(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1080/14733140600581218
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015). Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research, 25(1), 6–19. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.817696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CORE System Group. (1999). CORE system user manual. Leeds: Psychological Therapies Research Centre, University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, M. A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22(4), 464–474. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.673023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo, J., de Jong, K., Lucock, M., Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Gilbody, S., … McMillan, D. (2018). “Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: A multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial”: Correction. The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(8), doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30257-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfström, M. L., Evans, C., Lundgren, J., Johansson, M., Hakeberg, M., & Carlsson, S. G. (2013). Validation of the Swedish version of the clinical outcome routine evaluation outcome measure (CORE-OM). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20(5), 447–455. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., & Audin, K. (2002). Towards a standardized brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 180(1), 51–60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornells-Ambrojo, M., Johns, L., Onwumere, J., Garety, P., Milosh, C., Iredale, C., … Jolley, S. (2017). Experiences of outcome monitoring in service users with psychosis: Findings from an improving Access to Psychological Therapies for people with Severe Mental Illness (IAPT-SMI) demonstration site. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 253–272. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, R., Philips, B., & Barkham, M. (2015). Developing practice-based evidence: Benefits, challenges, and tensions. Psychotherapy Research, 25(1), 20–31. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.861093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, T., El-Gohary, M., Stuart, B., Gilbody, S., Churchill, R., Aiken, L., … Moore, M. (2016). Routine use of client reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011119.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knaup, C., Koesters, M., Schoefer, D., Becker, T., & Puschner, B. (2009). Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: Meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(1), 15–22. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108053967 doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J. (2007). Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research, 17(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/10503300601032506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Slade, K., Whipple, J. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2005). Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients’ progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 165–174. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., De Jong, K., & Rubel, J. (2015). Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: Where are we and where do we want to go? Psychotherapy Research, 25(6), 625–632. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1079661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor-Clark, J., Cross, S., Macdonald, J., & Skjulsvik, T. (2016). Leading horses to water: Lessons from a decade of helping psychological therapy services use routine outcome measurement to improve practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43(3), 279–285. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0587-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergård, O. K., Randa, H., & Hougaard, E. (2018). The effect of using the partners for change outcome management system as feedback tool in psychotherapy—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1517949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. (2012). Clients’ and therapists’ experience of tracking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Copenhagen, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart Brigham, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 298–311. doi: 10.1037/a0019247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Solstad, S. M., Castonguay, L. G., & Moltu, C. (2017). Patients’ experiences with routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback systems: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative empirical literature. Psychotherapy Research, 29(2), 157–170. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1326645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, B., Franklin, A., Mercer, B., Fraynt, R., & Simon, G. (2016). Progress monitoring in an integrated health care system: Tracking behavioral health vital signs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43(3), 369–378. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0648-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, G., Cowie, H., & Green, A. (2012). Therapists’ and clients’ perceptions of routine outcome measurement in the NHS: A qualitative study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12(1), 71–80. doi: 10.1080/14733145.2011.565125
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, M. (2014). Uses and abuses of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): Potential iatrogenic impact of PROMs implementation and how it can be mitigated. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(2), 141–145. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0509-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology and Health, 15, 215–228. doi: 10.1080/08870440008400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S. J., Kraus, D. R., & Castonguay, L. G. (2012). The treatment outcome package: Facilitating practice and clinically relevant research. Psychotherapy, 49(2), 115–122. doi: 10.1037/a0027932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar