The Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences: Measurement invariance across international datasets and languages

References

• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2018). SRMR in Mplus. https://www.statmodel.com/download/SRMR2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. (2022). Unpublished dataset. University of Roehampton.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., Di Malta, G., Knox, S., Oddli, H. W., & Swift, J. K. (2023). Patient perspectives on working with preferences in psychotherapy: A consensual qualitative research study. Psychotherapy Research, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2022.2161967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., & Norcross, J. C. (2016). A brief, multidimensional measure of clients’ therapy preferences: The Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., Norcross, J. C., Raymond-Barker, B., & Hogan, T. P. (2019). Psychotherapy preferences of laypersons and mental health professionals: Whose therapy is it? Psychotherapy, 56(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., van Rijn, B., Chryssafidou, E., & Stiles, W. B. (2022). Activity preferences in psychotherapy: What do patients want and how does this relate to outcomes and alliance? Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 35(3), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2021.1877620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Malta, G. (2021). C-NIP data (unpublished data). The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. S., Rice, L. N., & Elliott, R. (1993). Facilitating emotional change: The moment-by-moment process. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handelzalts, J. E., & Keinan, G. (2010). The effect of choice between test anxiety treatment options on treatment outcomes. Psychotherapy Research, 20(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300903121106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, P. E., Weck, F., & Kühne, F. (2022). Assessing patient preferences: Examination of the German cooper-norcross inventory of preferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 795776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., Knox, S., & Pinto-Coelho, K. G. (2019). Self-disclosure and immediacy. In J. C. Norcross, & M. J. Lambert (Eds.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (3rd ed., Vol. 1: Evidence-based therapist contributions, pp. 379–420). Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld, G., & Von Brachel, R. (2014). Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis in R – a tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(7), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Tona, A., Brugnera, A., Salerno, S., Tasca, G. A., Carrara, S., Lo Coco, G., Cooper, M., Norcross, J., & Compare, A. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Cooper – Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP). Manuscript Submitted for Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Lindhiem, O., Bennett, C. B., Trentacosta, C. J., & McLear, C. (2014). Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(6), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malosso, M. S. (2019). Adaptação transcultural para o português e validação de duas ferramentas de avaliação das preferências do cliente em psicoterapia: C-NIP e PEX.P1 [Cross-cultural adaptation into Portuguese and validation of two assessment tools for client preferences in psychotherapy: C-NIP and PEX.P1] [Doctoral dissertation]. ISPA-Instituto Universitario.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194–1218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer, Ö, & Yalçın, I. (2021). Cooper-Norcross Tercih Envanteri Türkçe Uyarlaması: Bir Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalı¸sması [The Turkish adaptation of the Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences: A validity and reliability study]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11, 26–44. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.790673
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Řiháček, T., Chvojka, E., Cígler, H., Cooper, M., She, Z., Di Malta, G., & Norcross, J. C. (2022). C-NIP invariance. OSF Registries. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M35GD
   Google Scholar
• Řiháček, T., & Mikutová, M. (2022). Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP): Psychometric characteristics of the Czech version. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 66(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.66.2.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangelo, P. R., & Conde, K. (2023). Preferencias psicoterapéuticas: Versión Argentina de las escalas PEX-1 y C-NIP-v1.1 [Psychotherapeutic preferences: The Argentine version of the PEX-1 and C-NIP-v1.1 scales]. Revista de Psicología, 41(1), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202301.015
   Google Scholar
• She, Z., Xi, J. Z., Cooper, M., Norcross, J. C., & Di Malta, G. (2023). Validation of the Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP) in Chinese lay clients and mental health professionals: Factor structure, measurement invariance, and scale differences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 70(4), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, A., Smith, T. B., Griner, D., Rodríguez, M. D., & Bernal, G. (2019). Cultural adaptations and multicultural competence. In J. C. Norcross, & B. E. Wampold (Eds.), Psychotherapy relationships that work, volume 2: Evidence-based therapist responsiveness (pp. 86–132). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, J. K., Callahan, J. L., Cooper, M., & Parkin, S. R. (2018). The impact of accommodating client preference in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(11), 1924–1937. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volders, A. (2021). Déterminer les préférences thérapeutiques d’un·e patient·e: Validation de la version française de l’Inventaire des Préférences de Cooper-Norcross [Master’s thesis]. Université. de Liège.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., Erikson, P., & ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windle, E., Tee, H., Sabitova, A., Jovanovic, N., Priebe, S., & Carr, C. (2020). Association of patient treatment preference with dropout and clinical outcomes in adult psychosocial mental health interventions. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar