Beyond disciplinary engagement: Researching the ecologies of interdisciplinary learning

References

• Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., & Michaud, G. (Eds.). (1972). Interdisciplinarity problems of teaching and research in universities. OECD, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI).
   Google Scholar
• Arthars, N., Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2024). Constructing a shared understanding of complex interdisciplinary problems: Epistemic games in interdisciplinary teamwork. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2341390
   Google Scholar
• Bammer, G. (2017). Should we discipline interdisciplinarity? Palgrave Communications, 3(1), art.30 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0039-7
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible utopia. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., & Jackson, N. (Eds.). (2020). Ecologies for learning and practice: Emerging ideas, sightings and possibilities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human development, 49(4), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A., & Born, G. (2013). Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2018). On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 353–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P., Van Horne, K., & Cheng, B. H. (2017). Special issue: Designing learning environments for equitable disciplinary identification. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix-Mansilla, V. (2017). Interdisciplinary learning: A cognitive–epistemological foundation. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed. pp. 261–275). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castek, J., Schira Hagerman, M., & Woodard, R. (Eds). (2019). Principles for equity-centered design of STEAM learning-through-making. University of Arizona. https://circlcenter.org/events/synthesis-design-workshops
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2015). Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damşa, C., & Jornet, A. (2017). Revisiting learning in higher education—framing notions redefined through an ecological perspective. Frontline Learning Research, 4(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i4.208
   Google Scholar
• Damşa, C., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damşa, C., Richter, C., Allert, H., Pargman, T. C., Markauskaite, L., Arthars, N., Spence, N., Andreadakis, Z., & Slotta, J. (2020). Learning in unbounded landscapes ̶ conceptualizations and design from an ecological perspective. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences: 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 1. pp. 366–373). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K., & Renshaw, P. (2019). Who’s talking (and what does it mean for us)? Provocations for beyond humanist dialogic pedagogies. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook on dialogic education (pp. 38–49). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy in education. Southern Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeZure, D. (2017). Interdisciplinary pedagogies in higher education. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed. pp. 558–572). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, A. M. (Ed.). (2021). Teaching climate change in primary schools: An interdisciplinary approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2019). The education ecology of universities: Integrating learning, strategy and the academy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2007). From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. In J. Hughess, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 41–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners’ classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (2010). The sociology of intellectual life: The career of the mind in and around the academy. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214060
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2021). Activity-centred analysis and design (ACAD): Core purposes, distinctive qualities and current developments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(2), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09926-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, H. J. (2016). The “problem” of interdisciplinarity in theory, practice, and history. Social Science History, 40(4), 775–803. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2016.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & Engestrom, Y. (2015). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed. pp. 128–149). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M., & Horn, I. S. (Eds.). (2020). The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences: 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 1-5). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee
   Google Scholar
• GUNI. (2019). Higher education in the world 7. Humanities and higher education: Synergies between science, technology and humanities. Global University Network for Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Gouvea, J., & Watkins, J. (2018). Idiosyncratic cases and hopes for general validity: what education research might learn from ecology/Casos idiosincrásicos y expectativas de validez general: lo que la investigación en educación puede aprender de la ecología. Journal for the Study of Education & Development, 41(4), 625–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2018.1504887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Crowley, K. (2020). Unpacking the learning ecosystems framework: Lessons from the adaptive management of biological ecosystems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrenkohl, L. R., Lund, K. S., Polman, J. L., Radinsky, J., Suthers, D., Tabak, I., & Kidron, A. (2018). Life-long life-wide learning within and beyond the disciplines. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count: 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018 (Vol. 2. pp. 1290–1295). International Society of the Learning Sciences, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jornet, A., & Damşa, C. (2021). Unit of analysis from an ecological perspective: Beyond the individual/social dichotomy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31(100329), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100329
   Google Scholar
• Kali, Y. (2024). An ecological paradigm of interdisciplinary learning: Implications for design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2354152
   Google Scholar
• Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2018). Gathering STE(A)M: Policy, curricular, and programmatic developments in arts-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Introduction to the special issue: STEAM focus. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1407979
   Google Scholar
• Kidron, A., & Kali, Y. (2015). Boundary breaking for interdisciplinary learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23(26496), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26496
   Google Scholar
• Kidron, A., & Kali, Y. (2017). Extending the applicability of design-based research through research-practice partnerships. EdeR Educational Design Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.1.2.1157
   Google Scholar
• Kidron, A., & Kali, Y. (2024). Promoting interdisciplinary understanding in asynchronous online higher education courses: A learning communities approach. Instructional Science, 52(1), 139–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09635-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (2006). A platform for a shared discourse of interdisciplinary education. JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-344
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (2017). Typologies of interdisciplinarity: The boundary work of definition. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2 ed., pp. 21–34). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.3
   Google Scholar
• Koichu, B., Schwarz, B. B., Heyd-Metsuyanim, E., Tabach, M., & Yarden, A. (2022). Interdisciplinary processes in school discussions. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 37, 100657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100657
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. (2016). “No! That’s not what we were doing though” Student-initiated, other correction. Éducation & Didactique, 10(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.2452
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2023). How to inhabit the earth: Interviews with Nicolas Truong. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (2010). Soaring above the clouds, delving the ocean’s depths: Understanding the ecologies of human learning and the challenge for education science. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10392139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindvig, K., & Ulriksen, L. (2019). Different, difficult, and local: A review of interdisciplinary teaching activities. The Review of Higher Education, 43(2), 697–725. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka, K. (2018). Phenomenal learning from Finland. Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, K., & Yunkaporta, T. (2013). The inclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander content in the Australian National Curriculum: A cultural, cognitive and socio-political evaluation. Curriculum Perspectives, 33(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I., & Säljö, R. (Eds.). (2011). Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., Meagher, L., Bandola, J., & Kettle, A. (2016). Interdisciplinary provision in higher education: Current and future challenges. Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., Arthars, N., & Spence, N. (2020). How students co-construct epistemic niches for joint knowledge work. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 1. pp. 369–370). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., Carvalho, L., & Damşa, C. (2023). Ecological perspectives on learning and methodological implications for research. In C. Damşa, A. Rajala, G. Ritella, & J. Brouwer (Eds.), Re-theorising learning and research methods in learning research (pp. 30–46). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., Damşa, C., Muukkonen, H., Thompson, K., Reimann, P., & Papendieck, A. (2021). Creating research-based design principles for interdisciplinary learning. In A. Wichmann, U. H. Hoppe, N., & Rummel (Eds.), Reflecting the Past and Embracing the Future, 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 49–52). Bochum, Germany. International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.2021/isls.org/islsws_02
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., Goodyear, P., Wrigley, C., Swist, T., & Mosely, G. (2023). Developing teachers’ interdisciplinary expertise: Consultation paper. The University of Sydney & The University of Queensland. https://interdisciplinaryexpertise.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Consultation-paper-Developing-teachers-interdisciplinary-expertise_2023.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., Muukkonen, H., Damsa, C., Reimann, P., Shaffer, D. W., & Kali, Y. (2019). Theories and methods for researching interdisciplinary learning. In K. Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings: 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019 (Vol. 2. pp. 1037). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., Muukkonen, H., Damsa, C., Thompson, K., Arthars, N., Celik, I., Sutphen, M., Esterhazy, R., Solbrekke, T. D., Sugrue, C., McCune, V., Wheeler, P., Vasco, D., & Kali, Y. (2020). Interdisciplinary learning in undergraduate and graduate education: Conceptualizations and empirical accounts. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences: 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 1. pp. 398–405). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., Muukkonen, H., Damsa, C., Thompson, K., & Reimann, P. (2020). Researching the ecologies of interdisciplinary learning. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences: 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 5. pp. 2650). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Markauskaite, L., & Nerland, M. (2019, August 12–26). An ecological framework for studying interdisciplinary learning: Linking culture, activity and mind. Paper presented at the 18th biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Aachen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, V., Tauritz, R., Boyd, S., Cross, A., Higgins, P., & Scoles, J. (2023). Teaching wicked problems in higher education: Ways of thinking and practising. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1518–1533. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1911986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Rainbird, S. (2015). Evaluating interdisciplinary collaborative learning and assessment in the creative arts and humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214561759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 107–119). Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muukkonen, H., & Kajamaa, A. (2024). Knowledge objects and knowledge practices in interdisciplinary learning: Example of an organization simulation in higher education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2344794
   Google Scholar
• Muukkonen, H., & Lakkala, M. (2009). Exploring metaskills of knowledge-creating inquiry in higher education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9063-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., Kaistinen, J., & Nyman, G. (2010). Knowledge creating inquiry in a distributed project management course. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 5(2), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206810000827
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. I. S., Lee, C. D., Pea, R., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2020). Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Nikitina, S. (2005). Pathways of interdisciplinary cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 23(3), 389–425. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2303_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novis-Deutsch, N., Cohen, E., Alexander, H., Rahamian, L., Gavish, U., Glick, O., Yehi-Shalom, O., Marcus, G., & Mann, A. (2024). Interdisciplinary learning in the humanities: Knowledge building and identity work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2346915
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Rethinking science: Knowledge in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor – an emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Kosonen, K., & Karlgren, K. (2011). The roles and uses of design principles for developing the trialogical approach on learning. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i3.17112
   Google Scholar
• Papendieck, A., & Clarke, J. (2024). Curiosity to question: Tracing productive engagement in an interdisciplinary course-based research experience. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2347597
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R., Grover, S., & Brown, B. (2020). Weaving the fabric of adaptive STEM learning environments across domains and settings. (Rapid community report series). https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6847
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, D., Bammer, G., Danielson, A., Gosselin, D., Gouvea, J., Habron, G., Hawthorne, D., Parnell, R., Thompson, K., Vincent, S., & Wei, C. (2016). The EMBeRS project: Employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(2), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0335-8
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R. (2019). Infrastructuring as a practice of design-based research for supporting and studying equitable implementation and sustainability of innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1552151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., & Sengupta, P. (2020). Theories of learning as theories of society: A contrapuntal approach to expanding disciplinary authenticity in computing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1828089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, P. (2024). Methodological challenges of research on interdisciplinary learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2354153
   Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F. (2008). Assessing interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 12, 171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The Coat Traps All Your Body Heat”: Heterogeneity as Fundamental to Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed. pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B., Heyd-Metsuyanim, E., Koichu, B., Tabach, M., & Yarden, A. (2024). Opportunities and hindrances for promoting interdisciplinary learning in schools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2344809
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B., Tsemach, U., Israeli, M., & Nir, E. (in press). Actor-network theory as a new direction in research on educational dialogues. Instructional Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative ethnography. Cathcart Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Sung, S., & Zhang, D. (2015). Toward an analytic framework of interdisciplinary reasoning and communication (IRC) processes in science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2809–2835. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1106026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slakmon, B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019). Democratization and education: Conditions and technology for dialogic transformative political education. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook on dialogic education (pp. 485–496). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnov, N., Easterday, M. W., & Gerber, E. M. (2018). Infrastructuring distributed studio networks: A case study and design principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(4), 580–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1409119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelt, E. J. H., Luning, P. A., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Mulder, M. (2017). A multidimensional approach to examine student interdisciplinary learning in science and engineering in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1224228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suthers, D. D., Lund, K., Rosé, C. P., Teplovs, C., & Law, N. (2013). Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, M. A., Sengupta, P., Shanahan, M.-C., Adams, J. D., & Hachem, M. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: A critical review. Studies in Science Education, 56(2), 213–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trisos, C. H., Auerbach, J., & Katti, M. (2021). Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(9), 1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01460-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Mulligan, J., Prain, V., White, P., Xu, L., Kirk, M., Nielsen, C., & Speldewinde, C. (2021). An interdisciplinary approach to primary school mathematics and science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1926–1949. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1946727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horne, K., & Bell, P. (2017). Youth disciplinary identification during participation in contemporary project-based science investigations in school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 437–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1330689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentien, S., Goeking, J., Dilig, R., Knapp, L., & Stanley, R. (2022). Interdisciplinary education: Literature review and landscape analysis. RTI International. https://connectednational.org/interdisciplinary-education-literature-review-and-landscape-analysis
   Google Scholar