Improving the Pilot Selection System: Statistical Approaches and Selection Processes

REFERENCES

• Bartram, D., & Baxter, P. (1996). Validation of the Cathay Pacific Airways pilot selection program. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 149–169. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0602_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D. (1993). Understanding regression assumptions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, M. L., & Naylor, J. C. (1968). Industrial psychology Its theoretical and social foundations. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing Commercial Airplanes. (2012). Current market outlook 2012-2031. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, L. C., Harsveld, M., & Hermans, P. H. (1997). The selective-listening task as a test for pilots and air traffic controllers. Military Psychology, 9, 137–149. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp0902_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Carretta, T. (2000). U.S. Air Force pilot selection and training methods. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 71, 950–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damos, D. L. (2012). Hiring pilots during a shortage: Some cautions. ICAO Training Report, 2, 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• De Corte, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Predicting adverse impact and mean criterion performance in multistage selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 523–537. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopher, D. (1982). A selective attention test as a predictor of success in flight training. Human Factors, 24, 173–184. doi:10.1177/001872088202400203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1974). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington, NY: Kreiger.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G. R., & Koonce, J. M. (1996). Review of psychomotor skills in pilot selection research of the U.S. military services. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 125–148. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0602_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A. (2002). Structure and timing in limited range dependent variables: Regression models for predicting if and when. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt ( Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis ( pp. 446–497). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, J. E., Finch, W. H., & Kelley, K. (2011). A comparison of two-group classification methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 870–901. doi: 10.1177/0013164411398357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormann, H.-J., & Maschke, P. (1996). On the relation between personality and job performance of airline pilots. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 171–178. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0602_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, K. (2013, November 7). Invasion: 7500 drones in U.S. airspace within 5 years, FAA warns. The Washington Times. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com
   Google Scholar
• International Air Transport Association. (2010). Guidance material and best practices for pilot aptitude testing. Montreal, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization. (2011). Global and regional 20-year forecasts. Montreal, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. T., & Ree, M. J. (1994). RANGEJ: A Pascal program to compute the multivariate correction for range restriction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 693–695. doi:10.1177/0013164494054003014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. E., Carretta, T. R., Retzlaff, P., Barto, E., Ree, M. J., & Teachout, M. S. (2013). Standard cognitive psychological tests predict military pilot training outcomes. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 3, 28–38. doi:10.1027/2192-0923/a000040
   Google Scholar
• Lane, G. G. (1947). Studies in pilot selection: I. The prediction of success in learning to fly light aircraft. Psychological Monographs, 61(5), 1–17. doi:10.1037/h0093593
   Google Scholar
• Lawley, D. N. (1943). A note on Karl Pearson’s selection formulae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 62(Sect. A, Part 1), 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, P.-W., & Koehly, L. M. (2003). Linear discriminant analysis versus logistic regression: A comparison of classification errors in the two-group case. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 25–49. doi:10.1080/00220970309600878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley, G., & Rose, M. (2014, May). Relative impact of method in selection model development. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Maroco, J., & Bartolo-Ribeiro, R. (2013). Selection of Air Force pilot candidates: A case study on the predictive accuracy of discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and four neural network types. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 23, 130–152. doi:10.1080/10508414.2013.772837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinussen, M. (1996). Psychological measures as predictors of pilot performance: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 1–20. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0601_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinussen, M., & Torjussen, T. (1998). Pilot selection in the Norwegian Air Force: A validation and meta-analysis of the test battery. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 33–45. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0801_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masche, P. (2004). Personality evaluation of applicants in aviation. In K.-M. Goeters ( Ed.), Aviation psychology: Practice and research ( pp. 141–151). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• McNicol, D. (1972). A primer of signal detection theory. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, J. L., Bard, D. E., Mumford, M. D., & Ang, S. C. (2004). Criterion-related validity in multiple-hurdle designs: Estimation and bias. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 418–441. doi:10.1177/1094428104268752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R. (1983). Fooling yourself with cross validation: Single-sample designs. Personnel Psychology, 36, 111–118. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00507.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olea, M., & Ree, M. J. (1994). Predicting pilot and navigator criteria: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 845–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, C. Y., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression and reporting. Journal of Education Research, 96, 3–12. doi:10.1080/00220670209598786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, N. S., Steinhaus, S. D., Edwards, J. E., & DeLessio, J. (1991). A logistic regression model for personnel selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 139–152. doi:10.1177/014662169101500204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (1996). Central role of g in military pilot selection. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 111–123. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0602_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., & Roth, L. (1996). Multi-stage selection strategies: A Monte Carlo investigation of effects on performance and minority hiring. Personnel Psychology, 49, 549–572. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01584.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, M., Olbrich, A., & Arendasy, M. (2004). Improvements in personnel selection with neural networks: A pilot study in the field of aviation psychology. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 103–115. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1401_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer, J., & Ree, M. J. (1996). Predicting pilot training success with logistic or linear regression: An example where it doesn’t matter and why. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 233–240. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0603_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, G. (1991). A validation study of the QANTAS pilot selection process. In E. Farmer ( Ed.), Human resource management in aviation ( Vol. 1, pp. 3–18). Brookfield, VT: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Stricker, L. J. (2005). The biographical inventory in naval aviation selection: Inside the black box. Military Psychology, 14, 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. C., & Russell, T. L. (1939). The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 565–578. doi:10.1037/h0057079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection. Test and measurement techniques. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1958). Bias and confidence in not quite large samples. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 614–623.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, L. C., Miller, M. R., & Ree, M. J. (1993). Structured interviews for pilot selection: No incremental validity. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 25–38. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0301_2
   Google Scholar
• Woychesin, D. E. (2002). Validation of the Canadian Automated Pilot Selection System (CAPSS) against primary flying training results. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar