REFERENCES
- Abbott, T. S., & Elliot, D. M. (2001). Simulator evaluation of airborne information for lateral spacing (AILS) concept (Tech. Rep. No. NASA/TP-2001-210665). Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
- Gladstone, C. X., Glover, G. K., Massimini, P. A., Massimini, S. V., Shiotsuki, C., & Simmons, B. (2000). Analysis of triple arrivals to Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport (Tech. Rep. No. MTR00W0000023). McLean, VA: Mitre.
- Hardy, G. H., & Lewis, E. K. (2004, August). A cockpit display of traffic information for closely spaced parallel approaches. Paper presented at the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Providence, RI.
- Hart, S., & Staveland, L. (1988). Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
- Joint Planning and Development Office. (2004). The next generation air transportation system integrated plan (JPDO Report). Retrieved from http://www.jpdo.gov/library/ngats_v1_1204r.pdf
- Magyarits, S., Kopardekar, P., Sacco, N., & Carmen, K. (2001). Simultaneous offset instrument approaches—Newark International Airport: An airspace feasibility study (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN02/01). Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center.
- Massimini, S. V. (2006). Simultaneous independent and dependent parallel instrument approaches, assumptions, analysis, and rationale. (Rep. No. MP 06W0000127). McLean, VA: Mitre.
- Miller, M. E., Dougherty, S., Stella, J., & Reddy, P. (2005). CNS requirements for precision flight in advanced terminal airspace. In Aerospace 2005 IEEE Conference (pp. 1789–1798). New York, NY: IEEE.
- NASA Ames Aviation Systems Division. (2008). CVSRF advanced concepts flight simulator. Retrieved from http://www.aviationsystemsdivision.arc.nasa.gov/facilities/cvsrf/acfs.shtml
- Rossow, V. J., Hardy, G. H., & Meyn, L. A. (2005). Models of wake-vortex spreading mechanisms and their estimated uncertainties (Tech. Rep. No. AIAA-2005–7353) Arlington, VA: AITO Forum.
- Taylor, R. (1990). Situation Awareness Rating Technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situation awareness in aerospace operations (AGARD-CP-478, pp. 3/1–3/17). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD.
- Verma, S., Lozito, S., Ballinger, D., Kozon, T., Hardy, G., & Resnick, H. (2009, October). Comparison of manual and autopilot breakout maneuvers for three closely spaced parallel runway approaches. Paper presented at the Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Orlando, FL.
- Verma, S., Lozito, S., Kozon, T., Ballinger, D., & Resnick, H. (2008, October). Procedures for off-nominal cases: Very closely spaced parallel runway approaches. Paper presented at the Digital Avionics System Conference, St. Paul, MN.
- Verma, S., Subramanian, S., Ballinger, D., & Kozon, T. (2012, October). Comparison of procedures for dual and triple closely spaced parallel runways. Paper presented at the Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) Conference, San Francisco, CA.