Effects of Training and Environment on Graduate Students’ Self-Rated Knowledge and Judgments of Responsible Research Behavior

REFERENCES

• Abbott, A. (1999). Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud. Nature, 398, 13–17. doi:10.1038/17883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. H. (2005). The acceptability of a doctoral degree earned online as a credential for obtaining a faculty position. American Journal of Distance Education, 19, 71–85. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_2
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G. N., Ball, N. L., & Smith, H. J. (2011). Information systems research behaviors: What are the normative standards? MIS Quarterly, 35(3), A1–A26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., Horn, A., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior?: Finding from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82, 853–860. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., & Louis, K. S. (1994). The graduate student experience and subscription to the norms of science. Research in Higher Education, 35, 273–299. doi:10.1007/BF02496825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the mertonion norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2007). Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(4), 15–34. doi:10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 19, 379–402. doi:10.1080/10508420903035380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2010). Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Academic Medicine, 85, 519–526. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd1cc5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R., & Brown, S. W. (2009). Ethics in educational research: A comparative analysis of graduate student and faculty beliefs. College Student Journal, 43, 599–615.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. E., Friedman, C. P., Rosenberg, J. L., Russell, J., Beedle, A., & Levine, A. S. (2006). Creating an infrastructure for training in the responsible conduct of research: The University of Pittsburgh’s experience. Academic Medicine, 81, 119–127. doi:10.1097/00001888-200602000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/peps.1991.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 151–162. doi:10.1080/03075079412331382007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S. J. (2001). Mentors, advisors, and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 455–468. doi:10.1007/s11948-001-0002-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunschweiger, P., & Goodman, K. W. (2007). The CITI program: An international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82, 861–864. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical Leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Kalichman, M. W. (1998). Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 487–498. doi:10.1007/s11948-998-0041-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinefelter, D. L., & Aslanian, C. B. (2014). Online college students 2014: Comprehensive data on demands and preferences. Louisville, KY: The Learning House, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cojuharenco, I., Shteynberg, G., Gelfand, M., & Schminke, M. (2012). Self-construal and unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 447–461. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1139-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. (2000). NIH cash tied to compulsory training in good behavior. Nature, 408, 629. doi:10.1038/35047242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. S. (2003). The role of culture in research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 10, 189–201. doi:10.1080/714906092
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunning, D., Griffin, D. W., Milojkovic, J. D., & Ross, L. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 568–581. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, F., & Ordway, S. (1996). Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2, 89–114. doi:10.1007/BF02639320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self or social psychology? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861–875. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2006). The mixed blessings of self-knowledge in behavioral prediction: Enhanced discrimination but exacerbated bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 641–655. doi:10.1177/0146167205284007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., Goodman, S. J., & Germano, K. K. (2009). Measures of mentoring, department climate, and graduate student preparedness in the responsible conduct of research. Ethics & Behavior, 19, 227–252. doi:10.1080/10508420902886726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. B., Wertz, F. J., & Goodman, S. J. (2009). Mentoring the responsible conduct of social science research. In D. M. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 550–565). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205–221. doi:10.1007/BF02074820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, H. (1994). Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 399–404. doi:10.1002/job.4030150505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory–versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 313–327. doi:10.1037/h0034747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, M. W. (2007). Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82, 870–875. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, M. W., & Friedman, P. J. (1992). A pilot study of biomedical trainees’ perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine, 67, 769–775. doi:10.1097/00001888-199211000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Langlais, P. J., & Bent, B. J. (2014). Individual and organizational predictors of the ethicality of graduate students’ responses to research integrity issues. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 897–921. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9471-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Assessing the accuracy of predictions about dating relationships: How and why do lovers’ predictions differ from those made by observers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1417–1429. doi:10.1177/0146167299259007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, P., & Kalichman, M. (2007). Mentoring. University of Arizona Program in Research Integrity Monthly Newsletters, 7, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737–738. doi:10.1038/435737a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirshekary, S., & Lawrence, A. (2009). Academic and business ethical misconduct and cultural values: A cross national comparison. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 141–157. doi:10.1007/s10805-009-9093-0
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behavior research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 131–149. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00490.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, M. M. (2002). Mentoring the mentors: The Yoda factor in promoting scientific integrity. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4), w1–w2. doi:10.1162/152651602320957682
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Antes, A. L., Beeler, C., & Caughron, J. J. (2009). On the corruption of scientists: The influence of field, environment, and personality. In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to corruption in organizations (pp. 145–170). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., & Antes, A. L. (2006). Validation of ethical decision-making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics & Behavior, 16, 319–345. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1604_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., & Devenport, L. D. (2007). Environmental influences on ethical decision making: Climate and environmental predictors of research integrity. Ethics & Behavior, 17, 337–366. doi:10.1080/10508420701519510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Medicine. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-2929-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health Service. (2000). Policy on instruction in responsible conduct in research. Retrieved from http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/programs/congressionalconcerns.asp
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Service. (2001). Responsible conduct in research education policy suspended. Retrieved from http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/programs/congressionalconcerns.asp
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R. (1994). Background: Theory and research. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (1997). Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296–1312. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonenshine, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in response to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1022–1040. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26585677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague, R. L., Daw, J., & Roberts, G. C. (2001). Influences on the ethical beliefs of graduate students concerning research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 507–520. doi:10.1007/s11948-001-0008-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12, 53–74. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, A. A., Turkkan, J., Jobe, J., Bachrach, C., Kurtzman, H., & Cain, V. (Eds.). (2000). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S., & Louis, K. S. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81, 542–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. C. (2012). Ethical academic judgments and behaviors: Applying a multidimensional ethics scale to measure the ethical academic behavior of graduate students. Ethics & Behavior, 22, 281–296. doi:10.1080/10508422.2012.672907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar