520
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Plagiarism of Chinese Secondary School Students in Hong Kong

, &

REFERENCES

  • Alexander, J. D. (1988). Lectures: The ethics of borrowing. College Teaching, 36, 21–24. doi:10.1080/87567555.1988.10532392
  • Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84–93. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.84
  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men: Research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Oxford, UK: Carnegie.
  • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 187–203. doi:10.1080/03075079712331381034
  • Babaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2017). Plagiarism among Iranian graduate students of language studies: Perspectives and causes. Ethics & Behavior, 27, 240–258. doi:10.1080/10508422.2016.1138864
  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373. doi:10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
  • Barkan, R., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2015). Ethical dissonance, justifications, and moral behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 157–161. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.001
  • Belot, H. (2016). Cheating at major Australian universities may be easier than many realise. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/cheating-at-major-australian-universities-may-be-easier-than-many-realise-20160122-gmbq30.html
  • Bolin, A. U. (2004). Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 101–114. doi:10.3200/JRLP.138.2.101-114
  • Bray, M., & Koo, R. (2006). Education and society in Hong Kong and Macao: Comparative perspectives on continuity and change. Hong Kong: Springer.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • Chang, C. (2015). Plagiarism on rise at Australian universities as academics face pressure to pass international students. Retrieved from http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/careers/plagiarism-on-rise-at-australian-universities-as-academics-face-pressure-to-pass-international-students/news-story/7953157d6edc051cf6d4577ec5eac01c
  • Cheung, H. Y., Wu, J., & Huang, Y. (2016). Why do Chinese students cheat? Initial findings based on the self-reports of high school students in China. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43, 245–271. doi:10.1007/s13384-016-0201-z
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: Explanatory factors from students’ perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8, 217–232. doi:10.1007/s10805-010-9121-0
  • Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, J. (2006). Using the business fraud triangle to predict academic dishonesty among business students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 10, 37.
  • Curtis, G. J., Gouldthorp, B., Thomas, E. F., O’Brien, G. M., & Correia, H. (2013). On-line academic-integrity mastery training may improve students’ awareness of, and attitudes toward, plagiarism. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 12, 282–289. doi:10.2304/plat.2013.12.3.282
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  • Deckert, G. N. (1993). Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 131–148. doi:10.1016/1060-3743(93)90014-T
  • Deng, Z. (2009). The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: An analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 585–604. doi:10.1080/00220270902767311
  • Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: A qualitative study of the reasons Australian university student plagiarize. Higher Research and Development, 26, 181–198. doi:10.1080/07294360701310805
  • Doró, K. (2014). Why do students plagiarize? EFL undergraduates’ view on the reasons behind plagiarism. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 11, 255–263. doi:10.2478/rjes-2014-0029
  • Education Bureau. (2007). Liberal studies curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Retrieved from http://334.edb.hkedcity.net/doc/chi/curriculum2015/LS_CAGuide_e_2015.pdf
  • Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2016). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students’ attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 231–246. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927850
  • Eiser, J. R. (1994). Attitudes, chaos, and the connectionist mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
  • Ghajarzadeh, M., Norouzi-Javidan, A., Hassanpour, K., Aramesh, K., & Emami-Razavi, S. H. (2012). Attitude toward plagiarism among Iranian medical faculty member. Acta Medica Iranica, 50, 778–781.
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354. doi:10.1007/BF00992130
  • Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Harris, R. A. (2001). Educating yourself about plagiarism. In R. A. Harris (Ed.), The plagiarism handbook: Strategies for preventing, detecting, and dealing with plagiarism (pp. 1–23). Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak.
  • Hayes, N., & Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics & Behavior, 15, 213–231. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1503_2
  • Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2016). Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination 2017. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/SBA/HKDSE/SBAhandbook-2017-LS-E-Feb15.pdf
  • Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Kitayama, S., & Lackenbauer, S. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of easterners and westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 294. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.294
  • Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2015). Chinese university students’ perceptions of plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 25, 233–255. doi:10.1080/10508422.2014.923313
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Huang, L. C., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Conformity in Chinese and Americans: A field experiment. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4, 427–434. doi:10.1177/002202217300400404
  • Jackson, P. M. (2006). Plagiarism instruction online: Assessing undergraduate students’ ability to avoid plagiarism. College & Research Libraries, 67, 418–428. doi:10.5860/crl.67.5.418
  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 233–247. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1103_3
  • Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333–351. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
  • Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
  • LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Haines, V. J., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1990). Situational ethics and college student cheating. Sociological Inquiry, 60, 190–198. doi:10.1111/soin.1990.60.issue-2
  • Leki, I. (1992). Building expertise through sequenced writing assignments. TESOL Journal, 1, 19–23.
  • Lim, V. K., & See, S. K. (2001). Attitudes toward, and intentions to report, academic cheating among students in Singapore. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 261–274. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1103_5
  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  • Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 1–10. doi:10.1080/00049530412331283426
  • Maxwell, A., Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2008). Does culture influence understanding and perceived seriousness of plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4, 25–40.
  • Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633–644. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 294–305. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2006.22697018
  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538. doi:10.2307/2959991
  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1996). What we know about cheating in college longitudinal trends and recent developments. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 28, 28–33. doi:10.1080/00091383.1996.10544253
  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396. doi:10.1023/A:1024954224675
  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 219–232. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
  • Meade, R. D., & Barnard, W. (1973). Conformity and anticonformity among Americans and Chinese. Journal of Social Psychology, 89, 15–25. doi:10.1080/00224545.1973.9922563
  • Moshagen, M. (2012). The model size effect in SEM: Inflated goodness-of-fit statistics are due to the size of the covariance matrix. Structural Equation Modeling, 19, 86–98. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.634724
  • Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41, 129–145. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_1
  • O’Rourke, J., Barnes, J., Deaton, A., Fulks, K., Ryan, K., & Rettinger, D. A. (2010). Imitation is the sincerest form of cheating: The influence of direct knowledge and attitudes on academic dishonesty. Ethics & Behavior, 20, 47–64. doi:10.1080/10508420903482616
  • Ouellette, M. A. (2008). Weaving strands of writer identity: Self as author and the NNES “plagiarist.” Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 255–273. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.002
  • Pepitone, A. (1976). Toward a normative and comparative biocultural social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 641–653. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.641
  • Project Atlas. (2016). International students in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/Services/Project-Atlas/Australia/International-Students-In-Australia#.V2I9CKTvOUk
  • Rettinger, D. A., Jordan, A. E., & Peschiera, F. (2004). Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: A vignette experiment. Research in Higher Education, 45, 873–890. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-5952-0
  • Riemer, H., Shavitt, S., Koo, M., & Markus, H. R. (2014). Preferences don’t have to be personal: Expanding attitude theorizing with a cross-cultural perspective. Psychological Review, 121, 619. doi:10.1037/a0037666
  • Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22, 218–233. doi:10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Sapp, D. A. (2002). Towards an international and intercultural understanding of plagiarism and academic dishonesty in composition: Reflections from the People’s Republic of China. Issues in Writing, 13, 58–79.
  • Savani, K., Markus, H. R., & Conner, A. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 861. doi:10.1037/a0011618
  • Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Vevea, J. L. (2005). Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: A meta-analytic reply to Heine (2005). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 539–551. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.539
  • Shei, C. (2005). Plagiarism, Chinese learners and western convention. Tesol, 2(1), 97–113.
  • Shteynberg, G., Gelfand, M. J., & Kim, K. (2009). Peering into the “magnum mysterium” of culture: The explanatory power of descriptive norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 46–69. doi:10.1177/0022022108326196
  • Song-Turner, H. (2008). Plagiarism: Academic dishonesty or “blind spot” of multicultural education? Australian Universities’ Review, 50, 39–50.
  • Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302.
  • Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 35–45. doi:10.1080/01973530903539895
  • Vowell, P. R., & Chen, J. (2004). Predicting academic misconduct: A comparative test of four sociological explanations. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 226–249. doi:10.1111/soin.2004.74.issue-2
  • Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274. doi:10.1023/A:1018724900565
  • Yeung, A. H. W., Chu, C. B. L., & Chu, S. K. W. (2012). Explore the behavior of plagiarism at the secondary school level in Hong Kong. Paper presented at CITE Research Symposium 2012, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.