Unpacking the Unethical Gift: Gift Experience and Unethicality Assessment

REFERENCES

• Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 203–214. doi:10.1509/jmkr.37.2.203.18734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2016). Hippies, greenies, and tree huggers: How the “warmth” stereotype hinders the adoption of responsible brands. Psychology & Marketing, 33(10), 796–813. doi:10.1002/mar.20918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 361–383. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9287-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–288. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. doi:10.1080/0305724022014322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskin, E., Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., & Novemsky, N. (2014). Why feasibility matter more to gift receivers than to gift givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 169–182. doi:10.1086/675737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 330. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 8(3), 275–289. doi:10.1080/10253860500160411
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1979). Gift-giving behavior. In J. Sheth (Ed.), Research in marketing (pp. 95–126). Connecticut, Greenwich: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. doi:10.1086/jcr.1988.15.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1996). The perfect gift. In C. C. Otnes & R. F. Beltramini (Eds.), Gift giving: A research anthology (pp. 59–84). Ohio, Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Popular Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 393–417. doi:10.1086/209357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betancourt, H., & Blair, I. (1992). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion model of violence in conflict situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 343–350. doi:10.1177/0146167292183011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee, A., Berman, J. Z., & Reed, A., II. (2013). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1167–1184. doi:10.1086/667786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, X., Wang, K. Y., Smith, A., & Yannopoulou, N. (2016). New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4249–4258. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornemann, T., & Homburgh, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Marketing, 38(3), 490–504.
   Google Scholar
• Caplow, T. (1982). Christmas gifts and kin networks. American Sociological Review, 47(3), 383–392. doi:10.2307/2094994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, M., & Attala, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer – Do ethics matter in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–578. doi:10.1108/07363760110410263
   Google Scholar
• Carrigton, M. J., Neville, B. J., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual behavior of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139–158. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cites. (2013). ETIS report of traffic. Retrieved from http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/16/doc/E-CoP16-53-02-02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Mortimer, G. (2013). Self-gifting guilt: An examination of self-gifting motivations and post-purchase regret. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(6), 472–483. doi:10.1108/JCM-05-2013-0566
   Google Scholar
• Cooper-Martin, E., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). Ethical consumption experiences and ethical space. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 113–119.
   Google Scholar
• DeJoy, D. M. (1989). An attribution theory perspective on alcohol-impaired driving. Health Education Quarterly, 16(3), 359–372. doi:10.1177/109019818901600305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Baumann, J., Williams, L. A., & Dickens, L. (2010). Gratitude as moral sentiment: Emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion, 10(2), 289. doi:10.1037/a0017883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos Frei Tas, D., De Oliveira, T. E., & Gianezini, M. (2017). Consumer’s perception on beef sustainability in Porto Alegre, southern Brazil. Business Management Dynamics, 7(2), 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, G. M., Belk, R., & Devinney, T. M. (2010). Why don’t consumers consume ethically? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 426–436. doi:10.1002/cb.v9:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M., & Stockburger-Sauer, N. E. (2013). Brand personality: A meta-analytic review of antecedents and consequences. Marketing Letters, 24, 203–216. doi:10.1007/s11002-013-9232-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertimur, B., & Sandikci, O. (2014). Alienable gifts: Uses and meanings of gold in Turkey. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(3), 204–211. doi:10.1002/cb.1479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faure, C., & Mick, D. G. (1993). Self-gifts through the lens of attribution theory. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 553–556.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, H., Knight, J. G., Zhang, H., Mather, D., & Tan, L. P. (2012). Consumer scapegoating during a systemic product-harm crisis. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(11–12), 1270–1290. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2011.645859
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, E. A., Hybernova, K., Esmark, C., & Noble, S. M. (2016). A tangle web: Views of deception from the customer’s perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(2), 198–216. doi:10.1111/beer.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., & Flynn, F. J. (2011). Give them what they want: The benefits of explicitness in gift exchange. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 915–922. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 15–26. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldi, J. (2016). Evaluation of the impact of Brazil’s sustainability on the behavioral intentions of stakeholders toward the country. Evaluation & Program Planning, 54, 135–143. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, T., Tinson, J., & Peloza, J. (2016). Giving the gift of goodness: An exploration of socially responsible gift-giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 29–44. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2076-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B. (2008). Asymmetrical effects of reward and punishment on attributions of morality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(4), 407–422. doi:10.3200/SOCP.148.4.407-422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, V., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2014). How techniques of neutralization legitimize norm- and attitude-inconsistent consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 29–45. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1667-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardian The. (2014, January). Pakistan’s demand for shahtoosh shawls threatens rare tibetan antelope. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/17/shahtoosh-shawl-rate-tibetan-antelope-kashmir
   Google Scholar
• Ha-Brookshire, J., & Yoon, S.-H. (2012). Country of origin factors influencing US consumers’ perceived price for multinational products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(6), 445–454. doi:10.1108/07363761211259250
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, P., Madison, K., Martinko, M., Crook, T. R., & Crook, T. A. (2014). Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: The road traveled and the path ahead. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 128–146. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Model templates for PROCESS for SPSS and SAS. Retrieved from www.afhayes.com
   Google Scholar
• Heath, T., Tynan, C., & Ennew, C. (2011). Self-gift giving: Understanding consumers and exploring brand messages. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(2), 127–144. doi:10.1080/13527260903236898
   Google Scholar
• Heath, T., Tynan, C., & Ennew, C. (2015). Accounts of self-gift giving: Nature, context and emotions. European Journal of Marketing, 49(7/8), 1067–1086. doi:10.1108/EJM-03-2014-0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M. D., Fujita, K., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). Trascending the “here”: The effect of spatial distance on social judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 845–856. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, J. R., & Walker Naylor, R. (2009). Ethical decisions and response mode compatibility: Weighting of ethical attributes in consideration sets formed by excluding versus including product alternatives. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 234–246. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B. K., Zauberman, G., & Bettman, J. R. (2012). Space, time, and interpersonal preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 867–880. doi:10.1086/666464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. –. E., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2013). The impact of moral emotions on cause-related marketing campaigns: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 79–90. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1233-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivetz, R., & Kivetz, Y. (2006). Reconciling mood contingency and mood regulation: The role of psychological distance. Working Paper, New York, NY: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Kouabenan, D. R. (1998). Beliefs and the perception of risks and accidents. Risk Analysis, 18(3), 243–252. doi:10.1111/risk.1998.18.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouabenan, D. R. (2002). Occupation, driving experience, and risk and accident perception. Journal of Risk Research, 5(1), 49–68. doi:10.1080/13669870110036577
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, S., & Valle, V. A. (1979). Dissatisfaction attributions and consumer complaint behavior. ACR North American Advances, 6, 445–449.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, A., Watson, B., Arlidge, C., & Fraine, G. (2011). ‘You’re a bad driver but I just made a mistake’: Attribution differences between the ‘victims’ and ‘perpetrators’ of scenario-based aggressive driving incidents. Transportation Research, 14(3), 209–221.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113–117. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70017-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luomala, H. T. (1998). A mood-alleviative perspective on self-gift behaviors: Stimulating consumer behavior theory development. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(1/3), 109–132. doi:10.1362/026725798784959318
   Google Scholar
• Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2013). Distance from a distance: Psychological distance reduces sensitivity to any further psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142(3), 644–657. doi:10.1037/a0030258
   Google Scholar
• McClure, J., Allen, M. W., & Walkey, F. (2001). Countering fatalism: Causal information in news reports affects judgments about earthquake damage. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(2), 109–121. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2302_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelidou, N., & Christodoulides, G. (2011). Antecedents of attitude and intention towards counterfeit symbolic and experiential products. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(9–10), 976–991. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2010.549189
   Google Scholar
• Mick, D. G., & Demoss, M. (1990). Self-gifts: Phenomenological insights from four contexts. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 322–332. doi:10.1086/jcr.1990.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick, D. G., & Faure, C. (1998). Consumer self-gift in achievement contexts: The role of outcomes, attributions, emotions, and deservingness. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(4), 293–307. doi:10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miniero, G., Codini, A., Bonera, M., Corvi, E., & Bertoli, G. (2014). Being green: From attitude to actual consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38, 521–528. doi:10.1111/ijcs.2014.38.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moores, T. T., & Chang, -J. C.-J. (2006). Ethical decision making in software piracy: Initial development and test of a four-component model. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 167–180. doi:10.2307/25148722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nellemann, C., Henriksen, R., Raxter, P., Ash, N., & Mrema, E. (2014). The environmental crime: Crisis – Threats to sustainable development from illegal exploitation and trade in wildlife and forest resources. A UNEP rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme and GRID-Arendal, Nairobi and Arendal. Retrieved from http://pfbc-cbfp.org/news_en/items/Environnmental-Crime-en.html
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, J., Barnes, J., Deaton, A., Fulks, K., Ryan, K., & Rettinger, D. A. (2010). Imitation is the sincerest form of cheating: The influence of direct knowledge and attitudes on academic dishonesty. Ethics & Behavior, 20(1), 47–64. doi:10.1080/10508420903482616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J.-C., & Yoon, S.-Y. (2014). Theory-based approach to factors affecting ethical consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(3), 278–288. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, J. G., McFerran, B., Morales, A. C., & Dahl, D. W. (2016). Wealth and welfare: Divergent moral reactions to ethical consumer choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 879–896. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paharia, N., Vohs, K. D., & Deshpandé, R. (2013). Sweatshop labor is wrong unless the shoes are cute: Cognition can both help and hurt moral motivated reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 81–88. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., Straeter, L. M., & De Hooge, I. E. (2015). Give me your self: Gifts are liked more when they match the giver’s characteristics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 487–494. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt-free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77, 104–119. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman, E., & Maglio, S. (2017). Mere gifting: Liking a gift more because it is shared. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(11), 1582–1594. doi:10.1177/0146167217718525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, L. N. (2014). Perception of risk and the attribution of responsibility for accidents. Risk Analysis, 34(3), 514–528. doi:10.1111/risa.2014.34.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker, M., Freitas, A., & Dolstra, J. (1994). A toast for the host? The male perspective on gifts that say thank you. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 165–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ruth, J. A. (1996). It’s the feeling that counts: Toward a framework for understanding emotion and its influence on gift-exchange processes. In C. C. Otnes & R. F. Beltramini (Eds.), Gift-giving: An interdisciplinary anthology (pp. 195–214). Bowling Green, OH: University Popular Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruth, J. A., Brunel, F. F., & Otnes, C. C. (2004). An investigation of the power of emotions in relationship realignment: The gift recipient’s perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 21(1), 29–52. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruth, J. A., Otnes, C. C., & Brunel, F. F. (1999). Gift receipt and the reformulation of interpersonal relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 385–402. doi:10.1086/209546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnall, S., & Cannon, P. R. (2012). The clean conscience at work: Emotions, intuitions and morality. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 9(4), 295–315. doi:10.1080/14766086.2012.742749
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (1967). The social psychology of the gift. American Journal of Sociology, 73(1), 1–11. doi:10.1086/224432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, K. (1985). Attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry Jr, J. F. (1983). Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 157–168. doi:10.1086/jcr.1983.10.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirieix, L., Delanchy, M., Remaud, H., Zepeda, L., & Gurviez, P. (2013). Consumers’ perceptions of individual and combined sustainable food labels: A UK pilot investigation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 143–151. doi:10.1111/ijcs.2013.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneddon, N. J., Soutar, G., & Lee, A. J. (2014). Exploring wool apparel consumers’ ethical concerns and preferences. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 18(2), 169–186. doi:10.1108/JFMM-03-2013-0039
   Google Scholar
• SoYon, R., Trope, Y., & Hansen, J. (2013). What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing causes versus consequences of events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 104(3), 457–472. doi:10.1037/a0031024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., & Tsai, C. I. (2012). Psychological distance and subjective experience: How distancing reduces the feeling of difficulty. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 324–340. doi:10.1086/663772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. E., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2017). Understanding variations in judgments of infidelity: An application of attribution theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 262–276. doi:10.1080/01973533.2017.1350578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, E. M. W., & Yang, Z. (2010). Moral hypocrisy: Of proud and grateful people. Social Psychology & Personality Science, 2(2), 159–165. doi:10.1177/1948550610385711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urien, B., & Kilbourne, W. (2011). Generativity and self-enhancement values in eco-friendly behavioral intentions and environmentally responsible consumption behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 28(1), 69–90. doi:10.1002/mar.v28.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2007). Moral hypocrisy. Psychological Science, 18(8), 689–690. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01961.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veer, E., & Shankar, A. (2011). Forgive me, Father, for I did not give full justification for my sins: How religious consumers justify the acquisition of material wealth. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(5–6), 547–560. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2010.517707
   Google Scholar
• Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 3(1), 243–252. doi:10.1037/h0022733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C. B., & Tran, T. (2007). Consumer gifting behaviors: One for you, one for me? Service Marketing Quarterly, 29(2), 1–17. doi:10.1300/J396v29n02_01
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, M. F., & Wallendorf, M. (2012). Intracommunity gifting at the intersection of contemporary moral and market economies. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 74–92. doi:10.1086/662198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weisfeld-Spolter, S., Rippé, C. B., & Gould, S. (2015). Impact of giving on self and impact of self on giving. Psychology & Marketing, 32(1), 1–14. doi:10.1002/mar.20760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Ellard, J. H. (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76, 103–118. doi:10.1509/jm.09.0581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wible, A. (2009). Knobe, side effects, and the morally good business. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 173–178. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9936-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. M., Wiesenthal, D. L., Flora, D. B., & Flett, G. L. (2011). Understanding driver anger and aggression: Attributional theory in the driving environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(4), 354–370.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. W., Lees‐Haley, P. R., & Price, J. R. (1996). The role of counterfactual thinking and causal attribution in accident‐related judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(23), 2100–2112. doi:10.1111/jasp.1996.26.issue-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19(3), 302–308. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Gilly, M. C. (1996). An experimental investigation of self-symbolism in gifts. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 458–462.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. O., Noseworthy, T. J., & Colwell, S. R. (2013). If you can’t see the forest for the trees, you might just cut down the forest: The perils of forced choice on ‘seemingly’ unethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 515–527. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1606-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Wildlife Federation. (2014). Unsustainable and illegal wildlife. Retrieved from http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/species/problems/illegal_trade/
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., & Keh, H. T. (2016). Taming the blame game: Using promotion programs to counter product-harm crises. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 211–226. doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1134362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., & Wang, J. (2009). Psychological distance asymmetry: The spatial dimension vs. other dimensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 497–507. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., & Xie, J. (2011). Effect of social and temporal distance on consumers’ responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486–496. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.3.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar