The importance and efficacy of controlling for social desirability response bias

References

• Ameen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (1996). Accounting students’ perceptions of questionable academic practices and factors affecting their propensity to cheat. Accounting Education, 5(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639289600000020
   Google Scholar
• Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., & Larsson, M. R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barger, S. D. (2002). The Marlow-Crowne affair: Short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79(2), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7902_11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., & Vassill, K. M. (2004). The association between bribery and unethical corporate actions: An international study. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(4), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2004.00375.x
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., & LaCross, C. C. (2004). Data contamination by social desirability response bias in research on students’ cheating behavior. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 1(8), 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v1i8.1973
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A. (2006). Associations between Hofstede’s cultural constructs and social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5353-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., & Adamaitis, K. L. (2007). Data contamination by social desirability response bias: An international study of students’ cheating behavior. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 11, 157–184.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., Baca, A. V., Landers, K. S., & Witek, M. B. (2008). Methods of cheating and deterrents to classroom cheating: An international study. Ethics & Behavior, 18(4), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701713030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., Banzhoff, C. A., Martino, A. M., & Savasta, K. J. (2011). Cheating and whistle-blowing in the classroom. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 15, 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1574-0765(2011)0000015009
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., Larkin, M. B., LaBontee, L. A., Lapierre, R. A., & Morse, N. C. (2012). Classroom cheating: Reasons not to whistle-blow and the probability of whistle-blowing. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 16, 201–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1574-0765(2012)0000016011
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., Goetjen, E. S., & Brax, J. M. (2013). Whistle-blowing in the classroom: The influence of students’ perceptions of whistleblowers. In S. Mintz (Ed.), Accounting for the public interest: An international perspective on accounting to society, in the advances in business ethics research series, edition 4 (pp. 247–271). Springer Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., Landry, A. C., Landry, E. E., Buonafede, M. R., & Berardi, M. C. (2016). What actions can be taken to increase whistle-blowing in the classroom? Accounting Education, 25(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2015.1107496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1992). Social desirability scales as moderator and suppressor variables. European Journal of Personality, 6(3), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, F. P., Kohls, J. J., & Anderson, K. S. (1991). The challenge of global ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(10), 767–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman, L. E., Reed, W. R., & Alm, J. (2010). A call for replication studies. Public Finance Review, 38(6), 787–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142110385210
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2003). Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023648703356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.5.4.400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. F., & Randall, D. M. (1992). The nature of social desirability response effects in ethics research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857570
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J., & Fick, C. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlow-Crowne social desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(2), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053002011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & O’Connell, B. (2000). An examination of using surrogate measures to assess social desirability response bias. Research on Accounting Ethics, 6, 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Haswell, S., Jubb, P., & Wearing, B. (1999). Accounting students and cheating: A comparative study for Australia, South Africa and the UK. Teaching Business Ethics, 3(3), 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009830308143
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2020). Hofstede’s insights. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/
   Google Scholar
• Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Hutchinson, G. (1993). Attributing negative intent to wife behavior: The attributions of martially violent versus nonviolent men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.102.2.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted, B. W. (1999). Wealth, culture and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jidin, R., & Monroe, G. S. (2017). Social desirability in behavioral accounting research. The Routledge Companion to Behavioral Accounting Research. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315710129-11/social-desirability-behavioural-accounting-research-radzi-jidin-gary-monroe?context=ubx
   Google Scholar
• Jo, M. S. (2000). Controlling social-desirability bias via method factors of direct and indirect questioning in structural equation models. Psychology and Marketing, 17(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<137::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalwani, A. K., Shavitt, S., & Johnson, T. (2006). What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. A. (2004). Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the ‘real world’? Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015784.34148.cb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnert, K., Park, Y., & Singh, N. (2015). Research note and review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: Boundary conditions and extensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2147-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leising, D., Scherbaum, S., Locke, K., & Zimmermann, J. (2015). A model of “substance” and “evaluation” in person judgments. Journal of Research in Personality, 57(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Leising, D., Locke, K., Kurzius, E., & Zimmermann, J. (2016). Quantifying the association of self-enhancement bias with self-ratings of personality and life satisfaction. Assessment, 23(5), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115590852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leising, D., Vogel, D., Waller, V., & Zimmermann, J. (2021). Correlations between person-descriptive items are predictable from the product of their mid-point-centered social desirability values. European Journal of Personality, 35(5), 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890207020962331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letzring, T. D., Murphy, N. A., Allik, J., Beer, A., Zimmermann, J., & Leising, D. (2021). The judgment of personality: An overview of current empirical research findings. Personality Science, 2, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6043
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, M. (1995). Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0004-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A. T., & Melvin, K. B. (1997). The attitudes of accounting students, faculty and employers towards cheating. Research on Accounting Ethics, 3, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(6), 6, 882–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.6.882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millham, J. (1974). Two components of need for approval score and their relationship to cheating following success and failure. Journal of Research in Personality, 8(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(74)90028-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyaw, M. K., & Ng, I. (1994). A comparative analysis of ethical beliefs: A four country study. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(7), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Clock, P., & Okleshen, M. (1993). A comparison of ethical perceptions of business and engineering majors. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(9), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Balanced inventory of desirable responding (BIDR). In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and psychological attitudes (pp. 37–41). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. The Role of Constructs in Psychological Educational Measurement. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781410607454-10/socially-desirable-responding-evolution-construct
   Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., & LeBel, E. P. (2012). Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. (2004). Perceived leader integrity and ethical intentions of subordinates. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410512741
   Google Scholar
• Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 3, 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. C., & Anderson, E. (1993). Control system and task environment effects on ethical judgment: An exploratory study of industrial salespeople. Organizational Science, 4(4), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, S. B., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (2001). Truth, consequences and culture: A comparative examination of cheating and attitudes about cheating among U.S., & U.K. Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010785106667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood, G. G. (1981). Self-serving biases in person perception: A reexamination of projections as a mechanism of defense. Psychological Bulletin, 90(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J., & Simon, R. (1974-1975). The effect of money incentives on family size: A hypothetical-question study. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38(4), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1086/268185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, R. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1993.10117614
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. J., Davy, J. A., Rosenberg, D. L., & Haight, G. T. (2002). A structural modeling investigation of the influence of demographic and attitudinal factors and in-class deterrents on cheating behavior among accounting majors. Journal of Accounting Education, 20(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00026-4
   Google Scholar
• Tormo‐Carbó, G., Oltra, V., Klimkiewicz, K., & Seguí‐Mas, E. (2019). “Don’t try to teach me, I got nothing to learn”: Management students’ perceptions of business ethics teaching. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(4), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2019). Corruption perceptions index 2019. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2019
   Google Scholar
• Triki, A., Cook, G. L., & Bay, D. (2017). Machiavellianism, moral orientation, social desirability response bias, and anti-intellectualism: A profile of Canadian accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(3), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2826-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, S. R., & Rittenbuerg, T. L. (2007). The ethical decision making of men and women executive in international business situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9129-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, S. R., & Hollingworth, D. (2012). Moral intensity, issue importance, and ethical reasoning in operations situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1107-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Ming, X., Wang, Z., & Adams, S. M. (2017). Are sex effects on ethical decision-making fake or real? A meta-analysis on the contaminating role of social desirability response bias. Psychological Reports, 120(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116682945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerbe, W. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (1987). Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. Academy of Management Journal, 12(2), 250–264. https://www.jstor.org/stable/258533?seq=1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar