Teaching publication ethics to clinical psychology doctoral students: case-based learning and semi-structured interview strategies

REFERENCES

• American Psychological Association. (2010). Amendment to the 2002 “Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct“. American Psychologist, 64(5), 493. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Crawford, J. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, M. M., & Gatz, M. (1992). Determination of authorship credit in published dissertations. Psychological Science, 3(6), 354–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curzer, H. J. (2021). Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility. Accountability in Research, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1794855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domenech Rodríguez, M. M., Erickson Cornish, J. A., Thomas, J. T., Forrest, L., Anderson, A., & Bow, J. N. (2014). Ethics education in professional psychology: A survey of American psychological association accredited programs. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(4), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, J. M., & Antes, A. L. (2018). Five dimensions of research ethics: A stakeholder framework for creating a climate of research integrity. Academic Medicine, 93(4), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. A., & Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. The American Psychologist, 11(11), 1141–1147. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/amp/48/11/1141/
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., & Feldman, L. G. (2009). Graduate socialization in the responsible conduct of research: A national survey on the research ethics training experiences of psychology doctoral students. Ethics & Behavior, 19(6), 496–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903275283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, R. D., & Ray, D. C. (2012). An ethical decision-making model to determine authorship credit in published faculty-student collaborations. Counseling and Values, 2(2), 214. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.2012.00018.x
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, R. K., Crego, C. A., & Johnston, M. W. (1992). Ethical issues in the supervision of student research: A study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 23(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.23.3.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffner, A. G. (1979). Authorship recognition of subordinates in collaborative research. Social Studies of Science, 9(3), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, J. (1986). Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(2), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., Pontille, D., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2021). Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT). Quantitative Science Studios, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00097
   Google Scholar
• Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Semistructured interviews. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 248–257). Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of multiple authorship: Power, performativity, and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1194–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngiam, W. X. (2022). Fully credited: Making publishing more equitable. APS observer, 35(1), 56–61. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/fully-credited-making-publishing-more-equitable
   Google Scholar
• Oberlander, S. E., & Spencer, R. J. (2006). Graduate students and the culture of authorship. Ethics & Behavior, 16(3), 217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1603_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osório, A. (2018). On the impossibility of a perfect counting method to allocate the credits of multi-authored publications. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2161–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2815-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., Boffito, D. C., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. Plos One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. C., & Russell, B. L. (2005). Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics & Behavior, 15(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammeleht, A., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Koort, K., & Löfström, E. (2019). Collaborative case-based learning process in research ethics. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0043-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueba, F. J., & Guerrero, H. (2004). A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics, 60(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027792.09362.3f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryon, G. S., Bishop, J. L., & Hatfield, T. A. (2007). Doctoral students’ beliefs about authorship credit for dissertations. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 1(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3918.1.3.184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar