The Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale

References

• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A. (2007). Gender differences in spiritual development during the college years. Sex Roles, 56, 835–846. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9240-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currier, J. M., Kim, S.-H., Sandy, C., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2012). The factor structure of the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale: Exploring the role of theistic and nontheistic approaches at the end of life. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 108–122. doi:10.1037/a0027710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMars, C. E. (2012). Confirming testlet effects. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 104–121. doi:10.1177/0146621612437403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, C. G., & Fan, D. (2008). Daily spiritual experiences and psychological well-being among U.S. adults. Social Indicators Research, 88, 247–271. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9187-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, C. G., & McFarland, M. J. (2013). The social context of religion and spirituality in the United States. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 21–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (2003). Factor analysis. In I. B. Weiner, J. A. Schinka, & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 143–164). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P. C., & Edwards, E. (2013). Measurement in the psychology of religiousness and spirituality: Existing measures and new frontiers. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 51–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkstein, S., & Tower, R. B. (2009). The Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale and well-being: Demographic comparisons and scale validation with older Jewish adults and a diverse internet sample. Journal of Religion & Health, 48, 402–417. doi:10.1007/s10943-008-9203-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2014). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. A. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44( 11 Suppl. 3), S69–S77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3903_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus (Mplus Web Notes No. 4). Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/CatMGLong.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2013). Mplus (Version 7.1). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, S.-M., Fong, T. C. T., Tsui, E. Y. L., Au-Yeung, F. S. W., & Law, S. K. W. (2009). Validation of the Chinese version of Underwood’s Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Transcending cultural boundaries? International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 91–97. doi:10.1007/s12529-009-9045-5
   Google Scholar
• Perez, J. A. (2012). Gender difference in psychological well-being among Filipino college student samples. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(13), 84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, D. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347–363. doi:10.1177/0734282911406661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarupski, K. A., Fitchett, G., Evans, D. A., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2010). Daily spiritual experiences in a biracial, community-based population of older adults. Aging Mental Health, 14, 779–789. doi:10.1080/13607861003713265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54, 371–384. doi:10.1007/BF02294623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, L. G. (2006). Ordinary spiritual experience: Qualitative research, interpretive guidelines, and population distribution for the Daily Spiritual Experience Scale. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 28, 181–218. doi:10.1163/008467206777832562
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, L. G. (2011). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Overview and results. Religions, 2, 29–50. doi:10.3390/rel2010029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, L. G. (2015, February 20). Introduction to the DSES. Retrieved from http://www.dsescale.org/
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar