The Spiritual Transcendence Index: An Item Response Theory Analysis

References

• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332. doi:10.1007/bf02294359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algina, J., & Penfield, R. D. (2009). Classical test theory. In R. E. Millsap, A. Maydeu-Olivares, R. E. Millsap, & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 93–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Thissen, D., & Du Toit, S. (2011a). IRTPRO (Version 2.1) [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, INC.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Thissen, D., & Du Toit, S. H. C. (2011b). IRTPRO: User’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 265–289. doi:10.3102/10769986022003265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. P., Carson, C. S., Shrestha, S., Kunik, M. E., Armento, M. E., Stanley, M. A., & Amspoker, A. B. (2015). Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire: Psychometric analysis in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 19(1), 86–97. doi:10.1080/13607863.2014.917606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5–18. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Exline, J. J., Pargament, K. I., Grubbs, J. B., & Yali, A. M. (2014). The religious and spiritual struggles scale: Development and initial validation. Psychology Of Religion And Spirituality, 6(3), 208–222. doi:10.1037/a0036465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, M., Willoughby, T., & Busseri, M. A. (2011). Stability and change in adolescent spirituality/religiosity: A person-centered approach. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 538–550. doi:10.1037/a0021270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 347–360. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T. W., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2007). RESEARCH: An item response theory analysis of the spiritual assessment inventory. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(2), 157–178. doi:10.1080/10508610701244197
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 38–47. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00543.x
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, B. K. (2004). Spirituality, health, and depression in international relief and development workers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65, 439.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. J. (2003). Spirituality and meaning in Korean immigrants exposed to cumulative trauma. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 1905.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Seidlitz, L., Ro, Y., Evinger, J. S., & Duberstein, P. R. (2004). Spirituality and affect: A function of changes in religious affiliation. Personality & Individual Differences, 37(4), 861–870. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D.B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F., Novick, M., & Birnbaum, A. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Oxford, England: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2005). Limited- and full-information estimation and goodness-of-fit testing in 2ⁿ contingency tables: A unified framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(471), 1009–1020. doi:10.2307/27590631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2006). Limited information goodness-of-fit testing in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychometrika, 71(4), 713–732. doi:10.1007/s11336-005-1295-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. L., Booth, T., McKenzie, K., & Kuenssberg, R. (2016). What range of trait levels can the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) measure reliably? An item response theory analysis. Psychological Assessment, 28(6), 673–683. doi:10.1037/pas0000215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, M. R. (1966). The axioms and principal results of classical test theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 1–18. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(66)90002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000). Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(1), 50–64. doi:10.1177/01466216000241003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S–X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(4), 289. doi:10.1177/0146621603027004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pargament, K. I., Mahoney, A., Exline, J. J., Jones, J. W., & Shafranske, E. P. (2013). Envisioning an integrative paradigm for the psychology of religion and spirituality. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14045-001
   Google Scholar
• Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 986–1013. doi:10.1111/1467–6494.00080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., & Yu, J. (1990). Parameter recovery in the graded response model using MULTILOG. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(2), 133–144. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00738.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34(4), Pt. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Sandage, S. J., & Shults, F. L. (2007). Relational spirituality and transformation: A relational integration model. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 26(3),261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidlitz, L., Abernethy, A. D., Duberstein, P. R., Evinger, J. S., Chang, T. H., & Lewis, B. B. L. (2002). Development of the Spiritual Transcendence Index. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 439–453. doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, W., Hall, T. W., & Edwards, K. J. (2001). Measuring religion and spirituality: Where are we and where are we going? Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29(1), 4–21. doi:10.1177/009164710102900102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. G., Chatters, L. M., & Levin, J. (2004). Religion in the lives of African Americans: Social, psychological, and health perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (2009). Item response theory. In R. E. Millsap, A. Maydeu-Olivares, R. E. Millsap, & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 148–177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Toland, M. D. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120–151. doi:10.1177/0272431613511332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 58–79. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar