Postmodern Cinema and Copyright Law: The Legal Difference Between Parody and Pastiche

Works Cited

• Aft, Rob H., and Renault, Charles-Edouard. From Script to Screen: The Importance of Copyright in the Distribution of Films (Geneva: WIPO Publications, 2011, Creative Industries—No. 6: Publication No. 950E). http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/copyright/950/wipo_pub_950.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances, adopted by the Diplomatic Conference on the Protection of Audiovisual Performances in Beijing, on June 24, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Belton, John. Introduction: Film and Copyright. Film History 19:2 (2007), 107–108.
   Google Scholar
• Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works of September 9, 1886 (as amended by October 2, 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Bimbaite, Monika. “When Is a Parody a Violation of Copyright?” International Journal of Baltic Law 1:2 (February 2004), 16–33.
   Google Scholar
• Constitution of the United States, Article I.
   Google Scholar
• Copyright Act of 1976, Pub. L. No. 94-553, 90 Stat. 2541 (Oct. 19, 1976), codified at various parts of Title 17 U.S. Code.
   Google Scholar
• Deazley, Ronan. Copyright and Parody: Taking Backward the Gowers Review? Modern Law Review 73:5 (2010), 785–823.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of 22 May 2001. Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Official Journal of the European Union, L series 167 (22/06/2001), 10–19. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexuriserv/lexuriserv.do?uri=celex:32001l0029:en:html
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, Tammi A. Fun and Profit: When Commercial Parodies Constitute Copyright or Trademark Infringement. Pepperdine Law Review, 21:1 (1994), 165–205.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Law Review Association. “The Protection Afforded Literary and Cartoon Characters through Trademark, Unfair Competition and Copyright” in Harvard Law Review 68:2 (1954), 349–363.
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheon, Linda. The Politics of Postmodernism (New York: Routledge, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham: Duke University Press, 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Kent, Meaghan Hemmings and Kaufman, Joshua J. An Associate's Guide to the Practice of Copyright Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Koumantos, Goerges. Private International Law and the Berne Convention. 24 Copyright 415 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, Leslie A. The Scope of Copyright Protection in the United States. Entertainment Law Review 6:3 (1995), 88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lemoine, Gano. Parody, Fair Use, Or Copyright Infringement? (Portland, OR: Lemoine Law Firm, October 26, 2010). http://lemoinefirm.com/parody-fair-use-or-copyright-infringement/
   Google Scholar
• Litman, Jessica. Digital Copyright (New York: Prometheus Books, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lombard & Geliebter, Trademark Attorneys. Copyright Infringement and Parody as Permissible Fair Use (New York: Lombard & Geliebter LLP, February 23, 2009) http://www.lgtrademark.com/wp-content/themes/nextclient/media/Copyright%20Infringement%20&%20Parody%20as%20Permissible%20Fair%20Use.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, Jean-Francois. The Postmodern Condition (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Meale, D. & P. England. Barry Trotter and the Infringement of Copyright—Parody Rules in the UK. Managing Intellectual Property (April 2008), 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Petridis, Sotiris. Comparative Issues on Copyright Protection for Films in the US and Greece. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 19:4 (2014), 282–292.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Kendall R. Projected Fears, Horror Films and American Culture (Westport: Praeger, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ramalho, Ana. Parody in Trademarks and Copyright: Has Humour Gone Too Far? Cambridge Student Law Review 5:1 (2009), 58–74.
   Google Scholar
• Roggero, Claudia. Colourisation and the Right to Preserve the Integrity of a Film: A Comparative Study between Civil and Common Law. Entertainment Law Review 22:1 (2011), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Seville, Catherine. The Internationalisation of Copyright Law: Books, Buccaneers and the Black Flag in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, J.A.L. International Codification of Copyright Law: Possibilities and Imperatives. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 33:3 (2002), 270–293.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Copyright Law, 17 United States Code (1982).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Copyright Office. Copyright Registration for Motion Pictures, Including Video Recordings—Circular 45 (Washington, DC: U.S. Copyright Office, March 2014). http://copyright.gov/circs/circ45.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Universal Copyright Convention (revised in Paris on July 24, 1971), United Nations Treaty Series (UNTS) 943:13444 (1971), 178–325. https://treaties.un.org/pages/cumulativeindexes.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Lee. Fair Use, Free Use and Use by Permission. How to Handle Copyrights in All Media (New York: Allworth Press, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO Copyright Treaty, adopted by the Diplomatic Conference in Geneva on December 20, 1996 (Geneva, WIPO, 1996).
   Google Scholar