Cinema and Surveillance Capitalism: Consumer Behaviorism and Labor Alienation in Paranoia 1.0 (2004) and The Circle (2017)

Works Cited

• Aupers, S. 2012. “Trust No One’: Modernization, Paranoia and Conspiracy Culture.” European Journal of Communication 27 (1): 22–34. doi:10.1177/0267323111433566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudry, Jean-Louis. 1974. “Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus.” tans. Alan Williams, Film Quarterly 28 (2): 39–47. doi:10.2307/1211632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z., and D. Lyon. 2013. Liquid Surveillance a Conversation. Cambridge: Polity
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. 2002. Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, edited by. H. Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinson, G., and R. Rushton. 2010. What is Film Theory? Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breu, C., and E. Hatmaker. 2020. “Introduction: Dark Passages.” In Noir Affect, edited by C. Breu, E. Hatmaker, 1–28. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, D. 2017. “‘The Circle’ Review: Tom Hanks Runs Social Media Cult in Implausible Thriller.” Accessed 10 December 2020. https://www.thewrap.com/the-circle-review-tom-hanks-emma-watson/.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers, Dave. 2013. The Circle. San Francisco: McSweeney’s Books. Kindle.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaesser, T. 2016. Film History as Media Archaeology Tracking Digital Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. D., and R. V. Ericson. 2007. The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1988. “Cognitive Mapping.” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson, L. Grossberg, 347–357. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1992. The Geopolitical Aesthetic: Cinema and Space in the World System. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kafka, F. 2009. The Trial, Trans. M. Mitchell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kammerer, D. 2012. “Surveillance in Literature, Film and Television.” In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, D. Lyon, 99–106. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. 2017. “‘The Circle’ Review: Tom Hanks and Emma Watson Star in a Misguided Story of Technology Gone Wrong—Tribeca 2017.” Accessed 10 December 2020. https://www.indiewire.com/2017/04/the-circle-review-tom-hanks-emma-watson-dave-eggers-1201809777/.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, T. Y. 2002. “Rhetoric of the Temporal Index: Surveillant Narration and the Cinema of “Real Time.” In CTRL[SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother, edited by T. Y. Levin, U. Frohne, P. Weibel, 578–593. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S., and J. Ferenbok. 2013. “New Media and the Power Politics of Sousveillance in a Surveillance-Dominated World.” Surveillance & Society 11 (1/2): 18–34. doi:10.24908/ss.v11i1/2.4456
   Google Scholar
• Moore, P. V., M. Upchurch, and X. Whittaker. 2018. “Humans and Machines at Work Monitoring, Surveillance and Automation in Contemporary Capitalism.” In Humans and Machines at Work Monitoring, Surveillance and Automation in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by P. V. Moore, M. Upchurch, X. Whittaker, 1–17. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. 2013. To save Everything, Click Here. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, L. 2012. “Control Space?: Cinematic Representations of Surveillance Space between Discipline and Control.” Surveillance & Society 9 (3): 263–279. doi:10.24908/ss.v9i3.4273
   Google Scholar
• Rouvroy, A., and T. Berns. 2013. “Algorithmic Governmentality and Prospects of Emancipation Disparateness as a Precondition for Individuation through Relationships?” Trans. Elizabeth Libbrecht. Réseaux 177 (1): 163–196.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, J. 2017. “Privacy under Surveillance Capitalism.” Social Research. An International Quarterly 84 (1): 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sobchack, V. 1998. “Lounge Time: Postwar Crises and the Chronotope of Film Noir.” In Refiguring American Film Genres, edited by N. Browne, 129–170. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solove, D. J. 2004. The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. 2015. Closed Circuits: Screening Narrative Surveillance. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Totaro, D. 2004. “One Point 0 Interview. Neo-Noir Science-Fiction.” OFF Screen. Accessed 10 December 2020. https://offscreen.com/view/one.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. S. 1998. “Collapsing the Interior/Exterior Distinction: Surveillance, Spectacle, and Suspense in Popular Cinema.” Wide Angle 20 (4): 93–123. doi:10.1353/wan.1998.0042
   Google Scholar
• Unknown. 2015. A chat with Icelandic filmmaker Marteinn Thorsson. Accessed 10 December 2020. https://natewatchescoolmovies.wordpress.com/2015/10/25/a-chat-with-icelandic-filmmaker-marteinn-thorssen/.
   Google Scholar
• Wark, M. 2019. Capital is Dead. London: Verso. Kindle.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenberg, D. 2019. “Seeing around the Next Corner: The Politics of Time Travel Surveillance Cinema.” Science Fiction Film & Television 12 (2): 195–223. doi:10.3828/sfftv.2019.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, C. 2015. Surveillance Cinema. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs. Kindle.
   Google Scholar