Prison nurseries: Experiences of incarcerated women during pregnancy

References

• Borelli, J., Goshin, L. S., Joestl, S., Clark, J., & Byrne, M. W. (2010). Attachment organization in a sample of incarcerated mothers: Distribution of classificiations and associations with substance abuse history, depressive symptoms, perceptions of parenting competency, and social support. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 355–374. doi:10.1080/14616730903416971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruggemann, O., Parpinelli, M. A., Osis, M, Cecatti, J. G., & Neto, A. S. (2007). Support to woman by a companion of her choice during childbirth: A randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Health, 4, 5–11. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-4-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne, M. W., Goshin, L. S., & Joestl, S. S. (2010). Intergenerational attachment for infants raised in a prison nursery. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 375–393. doi:10.1080/14616730903417011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., Scott, K. D., Klaus, M. H., & Falk, M. (2007). Female relatives or friends trained as labor doulas: Outcomes at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum. Birth, 34(3), 220–227. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536x.2007.00174.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. R., Jr., (2001). Prison nursery 2000: A five-year review of the prison nursery at the Nebraska correctional center for women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33, 75–97. doi:10.1300/j076v33n03_05
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E. A. (2014). Prisoners in 2013. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Office of Justice Programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, A. N. (2009). Impact of forced separation policy on incarcerated postpartum mothers. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 10(3), 204–211. doi:10.1177/1527154409351592
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Reinventing women’s corrections. In S. F. Sharp (Ed.), The incarcerated woman: Rehabilitative programming in women’s prisons (pp. 3–14). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C. (2009). A historical review of mother and child programs for incarcerated women. The Prison Journal, 89, 35S–53S. doi:10.1177/0032885508329768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daane, D. M. (2002). Pregnant prisoners: Health, security, and special needs. In S. F. Sharp (Ed.), The incarcerated woman: Rehabilitative programming in women’s prisons (pp. 61–72). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, P., Romero, T., & Cerbana, C. B. (2007). Parent education program for incarcerated mothers in Colorado. The Journal of Correctional Education, 58(4), 357–373.
   Google Scholar
• Goshin, L. S., & Byrne, M. W. (2009). Converging streams of opportunity for prison nursery programs in the United States. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 271–295. doi:10.1080/10509670902848972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goshin, L. S., Byrne, M. W., & Blanchard-Lewis, B. (2014). Preschool outcomes of children who lived as infants in a prison nursery. The Prison Journal, 94(2), 139–158. doi:10.1177/0032885514524692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goshin, L. S., Byrne, M. W., & Henniger, A. M. (2013). Recidivism after release from a prison nursery program. Public Health Nursing, 31(2), 109–117. doi:10.1111/phn.12072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2008). Parents in prison and their minor children. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Office of Justice Programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, K. C., Moore, G. A., Propper, C. B., & Mariaskin, A. (2008). Incarcerated women’s psychology functioning during pregnancy. Psychology of Women’s Quarterly, 32, 440–453. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00457.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, S. M., & Tomlin, A. M. (2010). Wee Ones Nursery evaluation: Findings from 2008–2009. Unpublished report, Riley Child Development Center, Indiana University School of Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of marriage and family, 67(4), 837–857. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemola, S., Stadlmayr, W., & Grob, A. (2007). Maternal adjustment five months after birth: The impact of the subjective experience of childbirth and emotional support from the partner. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 25(3), 190–202. doi:10.1080/02646830701467231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruschak, L. M. (2006). Medical problem of jail inmates. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Office of Justice Programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Mash, E. J., Johnston, C., & Kovitz, K. (1983). A comparison of the mother-child interactions of physically abused and non-abused children during play and task situations. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 337–346. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp1203_18
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. M. (2013). Prisons and prison life. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., Enroos, R., & Vierula, T. (2010). Children residing in prison with their parents: An example of institutional invisibility. The Prison Journal, 90(4), 516–533. doi:10.1177/0032885510382227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priddis, H., Schmied, V., & Dahlen, H. (2014). Women’s experiences following severe perineal trauma: A qualitative study. BMC Women’s Health, 14, 1–21. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-14-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroeder, C., & Bell, J. (2005). Labor support for incarcerated pregnant women: The doula project. The Prison Journal, 85, 311–328. doi:10.1177/0032885505279463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K., Berkowitz, G., & Klaus, M. (1999). A comparison of intermittent and continuous support during labor: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 180(5), 1054–1059. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70594-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shain, K., Strickman, C., & Rederford, R. (2007). California’s mother-infant prison programs: An investigation. Legal Services for Prisoners with Children. Retrieved from http://www.prisonerswithchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/CA-Mother-Infant-Prison-Programs_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, R. (2010). Pregnancy outcomes at the Indiana women’s prison. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 16, 216–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Sentencing Project. (2012). Incarcerated women. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/cc_incarcerated_women_factsheet_sep24sp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weisman, O., Granat, A., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Singer, M., Gordon, I., Azulay, … Feldman, R. (2010). The experience of labor, maternal perception of the infant, and the mother’s postpartum mood in a low-risk community cohort. Archive of Women’s Mental Health, 13, 505–513. doi:10.1007/s00737-010-0169-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteacre, K., Fritz, S., & Owen, J. (2013). Assessing outcomes for Wee Ones nursery at the Indiana women’s prison. Unpublished report, Community Research Center, University of Indianapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Wismont, J. M. (2000). The lived pregnancy experience of women in prison. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 45, 292–300. doi:10.1016/s1526-9523(00)00034-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Women’s Prison Association. (2009). Mothers, infants and imprisonment: A national look at prison nurseries and community-based alternatives. Retrieved from http://www.wpaonline.org
   Google Scholar
• Women’s Prison Association. (n.d.). Laws banning shackling during childbirth gaining momentum nationwide. Retrieved from http://66.29.139.159/pdf/Shackling%20Brief_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. S. (2000). Women’s perceptions of health care in prison. Health Care for Women International, 21, 219–234. doi:10.1080/073993300245276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar