An analysis of an intensive supervision program for sex offenders using propensity scores

References

• Abracen, J., Looman, J., Ferguson, M., Harkins, L., & Mailloux, D. (2011). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and comparison subjects: Recent outcome data from the Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario) high-intensity sex offender treatment programmed. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(2), 142–152. doi:10.1080/13552600903511980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abracen, J., Looman, J., & Langton, C. (2008). Treatment of sexual offenders with psychopathic Traits: Recent research developments and clinical implications. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 9, 144–166. doi:10.1177/1524838008319633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52. doi:10.1177/0093854890017001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., & Wasco, S. M. (2005). Understanding rape and sexual assault: 20 years of progress and future directions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(1), 127–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. N., & Roesch, R. (2012). “Tough on crime” reforms: What psychology has to say about the recent and proposed justice policy in Canada. Canadian Psychology, 53, 217–225. doi:10.1037/a0025045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo, M., & Krauss, D. (2014). Forensic and legal psychology. (2nd ed.): New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, C., & Dennis, J. (2014). The place of evidence in the treatment of sex offenders. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 24, 153–162. doi:10.1002/cbm.1904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, K. (1998). The containment approach: An aggressive strategy for the community management of adult sex offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1/2), 218–235. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.4.1–2.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, K., Jones, L., Patrick, D., & Pasini-Hill, D. (2003). Sexual offender containment: Use of the post conviction polygraph. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 411–427. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07322.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furby, L., Weinrott, M. R., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 3–30. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, T. A., Wood, J. L., Pina, A., Tyler, N., Barnoux, M. F. L., & Vasquez, E. A. (2014). An evaluation of mandatory polygraph testing for sexual offenders in the United Kingdom. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 26(2), 178–203. doi:10.1177/1079063213486836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaes, G. G., Flanagan, T. J., Motiuk, L. L., & Stewart, L. (1999). Adult correctional treatment. Crime and Justice, 26, 361–426. doi:10.1086/449300
   Google Scholar
• Gies, S. V., Gainey, R., Cohen, M. I., Healy, E., Duplantier, D., Yeide, M., … Hopps, M. (2012). Monitoring high-risk sex offenders with GPS technology: An evaluation of the California Supervision Program, final report. U.S. Department of Justice Report. Bethesda, MD: Development Services Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, M. D., Edwards, D., Pettus-Davis, C., & Abramson, J. (2013). Does volunteering for sex offender treatment matter? Using propensity score analysis to understand the effects of volunteerism and treatment on recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(4), 319–346. doi:10.1177/1079063212459085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubin, D., & Madsen, L. (2006). Accuracy and utility of post-conviction polygraph testing of sex offenders. British Journal of Psychology, 188, 479–483. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.008953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, K., Mitchell, C., Butter, C., & Harwood, R. (1990). Sex offenders: Identifying who can complete a residential treatment program. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 8(4), 465–471. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370080412
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865–891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss, M. T. (2014). Forensic psychology: Research, clinical practice, and applications (2nd ed.): Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika, 87(3), 706–710. doi:10.1093/biomet/87.3.706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenuwine, M. J., Simmons, R., & Swies, E. (2003). Community supervision of sex offenders: Integrating probation and clinical treatment. Federal Probation, 67(3), 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kokish, R., Levenson, J. S., & Blasingame, G. D. (2005). Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: Client-reported perceptions of utility and accuracy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 211–221. doi:10.1177/107906320501700210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konopasek, J. E. (2015). Expeditious disclosure of sexual history via polygraph testing: Treatment outcome and sex offense recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54(3), 194–211. doi:10.1080/10509674.2015.1023481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. K., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & West, M. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offender recidivism: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21(1), 28–54. doi:10.1177/0093854894021001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(1), 79–107. doi:10.1177/107906320501700108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. L., & Laws, D. R. (2003). A brief history of behavioral and cognitive behavioral approaches to sexual offenders: Part 2, the modern era. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15(2), 93–120. doi:10.1023/A:1022389915245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall, W. L., & Marshall, L. E. (2014). Psychological treatment of sex offenders: Recent innovations. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 37(2), 163–171. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2014.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, D. E., Delucchi, K. L., & Binder, R. L. (2011). Prospective study of the San Francisco behavioral health court: Criminal justice and clinical outcomes at one year follow-up. (Report submitted to the city and county of San Francisco). Retrieved from http://www.sfcourts.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=2800
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, C., & Jackson, P. (1989). High-risk recognition: The cognitive-behavioral chain. In D. Laws (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 167–177). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, K. G., Bales, W. D., & Blomberg, T. G. (2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(1), 61–91. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00102.x
   Google Scholar
• Perez, D. M. (2008). An outcome evaluation of the Brunswick correctional center sex offender residential treatment (SORT) program. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(2-A), 762.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. R., & Turner, S. (1990). Comparing intensive and regular supervision for high-risk probationers: Early results from an experiment in California. Crime & Delinquency, 36(1), 87–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, R., & Muller, J. (2010). The containment approach to managing defendants charged with sex offenses. Federal Probation, 74(2), 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Polaschek, D. L. (2012). An appraisal of the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8333.2011.02038.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C. J., Morgan, R. D., Gross, N. R., & McDonald, B. R. (2012). Treating criminal behavior: Is the bang worth the buck? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 144–165. doi:10.1037/a0024714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskey, J. W. (2013). The (f)utility of post-conviction polygraph testing. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(3), 259–281. doi:10.1177/1079063212455668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, N., Lien, E., & Huss, M. T. (2014). An examination of the LS/CMI: Does this popular risk assessment tool measures up? Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2002). The effects of prison and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: General effects and individual differences. Retrieved from http://www.ccoso.org
   Google Scholar
• Spreeuwenberg, M. D., Bartak, A., Croon, M. A., Hagenaars, J. A., Busschbach, J. J., Andrea, H., & Stijnen, T. (2010). The multiple propensity score as control for bias in the comparison of more than two treatment arms: An introduction from a case study in mental health. Medical Care, 48(2), 166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalans, L. J., Seng, M., & Yarnold, P. R. (2002). Long-term impact evaluation of specialized sex offender probation programs in Lake, DuPage, and Winnebago counties. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman, H. J., Redlich, A., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. C., & Vesselinov, R. (2010). Effect of mental health courts on arrests and jail days: A multisite study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 167. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar