Assessing the current state of juvenile probation practice: A statutory analysis

References

• Altschuler, D. M. (2002). Juvenile corrections and continuity of care in a community context: The evidence and promising directions. Federal Probation, 66(2), 72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52. doi: 10.1177/0093854890017001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 735–755. doi: 10.1177/0093854811406356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnoski, R.., & Drake, E. K. (2007). Washington's offender accountability act: Department of Corrections’ static risk instrument (Document No. 07-03-1201). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, M. (2003). Best practices in juvenile accountability: Overview (No. NCJ 184745). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, V. S., Jr., James, F., Langworthy, R. H., & Barker, T. A. (1993). The prescribed roles of police in a free society: Analyzing state legal codes. Justice Quarterly, 10(4), 683–695. doi: 10.1080/07418829300092071
   Google Scholar
• Burton, V. S., Jr., Latessa, E. J., & Barker, T. (1992). The role of probation officers: An examination of statutory requirements. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 8(4), 273–282. doi: 10.1177/104398629200800401
   Google Scholar
• Butts, J. A., & Mears, D. P. (2001). Reviving juvenile justice in a get-tough era. Youth and Society, 33(2), 169–198. doi: 10.1177/0044118x01033002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilulio, J. J., Jr. (1995, November 27). The coming of the super-predators. The Weekly Standard, 1(11), 23.
   Google Scholar
• Eglash, A. (1977). Beyond restitution: Creative restitution. In J. Hudson & B. Galaway (Eds.), Restitution in criminal justice (pp. 91–99). Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, M. M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, E., & Hemmens, C. (1995). Juvenile waiver in the United States 1979–1995: A comparison and analysis of state waiver statues. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 46(3), 17–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.1995.tb00820.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., Cullen, F. T., & Andrews, D. A. (2000). The effects of community sanctions and incarceration on recidivism. Forum on Corrections Research, 12(2), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., & Torbet, P. (2002). Desktop guide to good juvenile probation practice. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Haqanee, Z., Peterson-Badali, M., & Skilling, T. (2015). Making “what works” work: Examining probation officers’ experiences addressing the criminogenic needs of juvenile offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54(1), 37–59. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2014.980485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmens, C. (2015). We [should] take care of our own: The role of law and lawyers in criminal justice and criminology programs. Justice Quarterly, 32, 749–767. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2015.1016091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmens, C., Fritsch, E., & Caeti, T. J. (1997). Juvenile justice code purpose clauses: The power of words. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 8(2/3), 221–246. doi: 10.1177/088740349700800205
   Google Scholar
• Hemmens, C., Maahs, J., Scarborough, K. E., & Collins, P. A. (2001). Watching the watchmen: State regulation of private security 1982–1998. Security Journal, 14(4), 17–28. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.sj.8340095
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, M. L., Hafoka, M., Woo, Y., van Wormer, J., Stohr, M. K., & Hemmens, C. (2015). Probation officer roles: A statutory analysis. Federal Probation, 79(3), 20–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hyatt, J. M., & Barnes, G. C. (2014). An experimental evaluation of the impact of intensive supervision on the recidivism of high-risk probationers. Crime and Delinquency, 1–36. doi:10.1177/0011128714555757
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. A., Clark, P. A., & Quiros, R. J. (2012). Juvenile probation and mentoring: The referral stage. In J. M. Miller, H. V. Miller, J. C. Barnes, P. A. Clark, M. A. Jones, R. J. Quiros, S., & B. Peterson (Eds.), Referring youth in juvenile justice settings to mentoring programs: Effective strategies and practices to improving the mentoring experience for at-risk and high-risk youth (pp. 147–158). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Klockars, C. B. Jr. (1972). A theory of probation supervision. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 63(4), 550–557.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2011). Corrections in the community (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124–147. doi: 10.1080/15564880802612573
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., Kelly, M. R., Chapman, G., & Carver, D. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs: A new perspective on evidence-based practice. Center for juvenile justice reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Flores, A. W., Holsinger, A. M., Makarios, M. D., & Latessa, E. J. (2010). Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 368–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luong, D., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). Applying risk/need assessment to probation practice and its impact on the recidivism of young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(12), 1177–1199. doi: 10.1177/0093854811421596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutze, F. E. (2014). Professional lives of community corrections officers: The invisible side of reentry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency, 46(4), 457–471. doi: 10.1177/0011128700046004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2015). Contemporary modes of probation officer supervision: The triumph of the “synthetic” officer? Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 314–336. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2013.770546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J.W. v. State, 210 S.E. 2d 842 (Ga. App. 1974).
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Juvenile, and Family Court Judges. (2005). Juvenile delinquency guidelines: Improving court practice in juvenile delinquency cases. Reno, NV: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, L. E., Piven, H., & Pappenfort, D. M. (1956). Major dilemmas of the social worker in probation and parole. Crime and Delinquency, 2(3), 221–225. doi: 10.1177/001112875600200305
   Google Scholar
• Peters, C. M. (2011). Social work and juvenile probation: Historical tensions and contemporary convergences. Social Work, 56(4), 355–365. doi: 10.1093/sw/56.4.355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice, 17, 281–335.
   Google Scholar
• P.R. et al. v. State, 210 S.E. 2d 839 (Ga. App. 1974).
   Google Scholar
• Purkiss, M., Kifer, M., Hemmens, C., & Burton, V. S., Jr. (2003). Probation officer functions: A statutory analysis. Federal Probation, 67(1), 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Roncace, B., Giacomazzi, A., Hemmens, C., & Fliege, G. (2005). Role expectations of the police: An analysis of 50 state statutes. The Police Journal, 78(4), 301–326. doi: 10.1350/pojo.2005.78.4.301
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2012). Toward an integrated theory of probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(2), 185–201. doi: 10.1177/0093854811430185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S., & Maschi, T. (2009). Investigating probation strategies with juvenile offenders: The influence of officers’ attitudes and youth characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 33(5), 357–367. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9158-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, R. A. (2002). Probation strategies of juvenile and adult pre-service trainees. Federal Probation, 66(1), 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sluder, R. D., & Reddington, F. P. (1993). An empirical examination of the work ideologies of juvenile and adult probation officers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 20(1/2), 115–137. doi: 10.1300/j076v20n01_08
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, B., & Hemmens, C. (2003). Juvenile waiver 2003: Where are we now? Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 54(2), 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2003.tb00150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, B., Purkiss, M., Kifer, M., Roberts, E., & Hemmens, C. (2004). Legally prescribed functions of adult and juvenile probation officers: Worlds apart? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39(4), 47–67. doi: 10.1300/j076v39n04_04
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, B., Roberts, E., & Hemmens, C. (2003). Where is juvenile probation today? The legally prescribed functions of juvenile probation officers. Criminal Justice Studies, 16(4), 267–281. doi: 10.1080/0888431032000183470
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, C., Steiner, B., Rohrbach, J., Hemmens, C., & Bennett, K. (in press). All the way home: Assessing the constitutionality of juvenile curfew laws. American Journal of Criminal Law, 42(3), 177–211.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2008). No illusions: Offender and organizational change in Maryland's proactive community supervision model. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(2), 275–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00508.x
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2012). Implementation of evidence-based community corrections and addiction treatment. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., Henderson, C., Young, D., & Farrell, J. (2014). The impact of training interventions on organizational readiness to support innovations in juvenile justice offices. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(2), 177–188. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0445-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. R., Hemmens, C., & Matz, A. K. (2014). Is it reasonable? A legal review of warrantless searches of probationers and parolees. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 1–18. doi:10.1177/0887403414554996
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. S. (1995). Holding juvenile offenders accountable: A restorative justice perspective. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 46(2), 31–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.1995.tb00815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ness, D., & Strong, K. H. (1997). Restoring justice. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, G., & Kupchik, A. (2010). What drives juvenile probation officers? Relating organizational contexts, status characteristics, and personal convictions to treatment and punishment orientations. Crime and Delinquency, 56(1), 35–69. doi: 10.1177/0011128707307960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, J., Mei, X., Hemmens, C., & Stohr, M. K. (2016). Rapists’ parental rights: Adding insult to injury. Criminal Law Bulletin, 52(1), 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. W., Farrell, J. L., & Taxman, F. S. (2013). Impacts of juvenile probation training models on youth recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 30(6), 1068–1089. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2012.673633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar