1,443
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Hiring and retaining formerly incarcerated persons: An employer-based perspective

&

References

  • Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis.
  • Apel, R., & Horney, J. (2017). How and why does work matter? Employment conditions, routine activities, and crime among adult male formerly incarcerated persons. Criminology, 55(2), 307–343. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12134
  • Bailey, C. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research. California, USA: SAGE Publications.
  • Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(6), 768–813. doi:10.1177/0002764298041006003
  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Breese, J. R., Ra'el, K., & Grant, G. K. (2000). No place like home: A qualitative investigation of social support and its effects on recidivism. Sociological Practice, 2(1), 1–21. doi:10.1023/A:101010382149
  • Bushway, S., Stoll, M., & Welman, D. (2007). Barriers to re-entry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America. New York, USA: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 19(6), 418–427. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). California, USA: SAGE Publications.
  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Fahey, J., Roberts, C., & Engel, L. (2006). Employment of ex-formerly incarcerated persons: Employer perspectives. Crime and Justice Institute, Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety, Boston, MA.
  • Farrall, S., & Calverley, A. (2006). Understanding desistance from crime: Theoretical directions in resettlement and rehabilitation. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fergusson, D. M., McLeod, G. F., & Horwood, L. J. (2014). Unemployment and psychosocial outcomes to age 30: A fixed-effects regression analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(8), 735–742. doi:10.1177/0004867414525840
  • Giordano, P., Cernkovich, S., & Rudolph, J. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064. doi:10.1086/343191
  • Harris, M. K. (2005). In search of common ground: The importance of theoretical orientations in criminology and criminal justice. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(2), 311–328. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00023.x
  • Holzer, H., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. (2003). Employment barriers facing formerly incarcerated persons. Paper presented at the Urban Institute’s Reentry Roundtable, New York University Law School, May 19–20.
  • Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for formerly incarcerated persons: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451–476. doi:10.1007/s11292-005-3541-7
  • Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994 (NCJ 193427). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  • Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159. doi:10.1177/1477370807087640
  • Lutman, B., Lynch, C., & Monk-Turner, E. (2015). De-demonizing the “monstrous” drug addict: A qualitative look at social reintegration through rehabilitation and employment. Critical Criminology, 23(1), 57–72. doi:10.1007/s10612-014-9244-5
  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Maruna, S., LeBel, T., Mitchell, N., & Naples, M. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 271–281. doi:10.1080/10683160410001662762
  • Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. (2015). Strengths-based restorative approaches to reentry: The evolution of creative restitution, reintegration and destigmatization. In N. Ronel & D. Segev (Eds.), Positive criminology (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • McAdams, D., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003–1015. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.62.6.1003
  • McNeill, F. (2012). Four forms of ‘offender’ rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 18–36. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02039.x
  • Meisenhelder, T. (1977). An explanatory study of exiting from criminal careers. Criminology, 15(3), 319–334. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1977.tb00069.x
  • Morenoff, J. D., & Harding, D. J. (2014). Incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 411–429. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145511
  • Pagano, M., Post, S., & Johnson, S. (2011). Alcoholics anonymous—related helping and the helper therapy principle. Alcohol Treatment Quarterly, 29(1), 23–34. doi:10.1080/07347324.2011.538320
  • Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975. doi:10.1086/374403
  • Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the ‘feared self’: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156.
  • Petrich, D. (2017). Narrating stories of desistance: Pathways to and from criminality in the lives of prolific male formerly incarcerated persons (Unpublished Master of Arts thesis). Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University.
  • Petrich, D., & Morrison, B. (2015). The Alternatives to Violence Project: Using positive criminology as a framework for understanding rehabilitation and reintegration. In T. Gavrielides (Ed.), Formerly incarcerated persons no more: An interdisciplinary restorative justice dialogue (pp. 247–266). Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Science Publishers.
  • Raphael, S. (2011). Incarceration and prisoner reentry in the US. The Annals of the American Academy, 635(1), 192–215. doi:10.1177/0002716210393321
  • Ramakers, A., Nieuwbeerta, P., Van Wilsem, J., & Dirkzwager, A. (2017). Not just any job will do: A study on employment characteristics and recidivism risks after release. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 1795–1818.
  • Reich, S. (2017). An exception to the rule: Belief in redeemability, desistance signals, and the employer’s decision to hire a job applicant with a criminal record. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(2), 110–136. doi:10.1080/10509674.2016.1268235
  • Rocque, M., Posick, C., & Paternoster, R. (2016). Identities through time: An exploration of identity change as a cause of desistance. Justice Quarterly, 33(1), 45–72. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.894111
  • Samik-Ibrahim, R. M. (2000). Grounded theory methodology as the research strategy for a developing country. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Art. 19.
  • Sentencing Project. (2017). Trends in U.S. Corrections. http://sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Trends-in-US-Corrections.pdf
  • Shapland, J., & Bottoms, A. (2011). Reflections on social values, offending and desistance among young adult recidivists. Punishment & Society, 13(3), 256–282. doi:10.1177/1462474511404334
  • Skardhamar, T., & Telle, K. (2012). Post-release employment and recidivism in Norway. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(4), 629–649. doi:10.1007/s10940-012-9166-x
  • Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001). From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
  • Uggen, C. (1999). Ex-formerly incarcerated persons and the conformist alternative: A job quality model of work and crime. Social Problems, 46(1), 127–151. doi:10.2307/3097165
  • Uggen, C., & Stewart, R. (2015). Piling on: Collateral consequences and community supervision. Minnesota Law Review, 99(5), 1871–1910.
  • Uggen, C., & Wakefield, S. (2008). What have we learned from longitudinal studies of work and crime? In A. Liberman (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 191–219). New York, USA: Springer.
  • Visher, C. A., Debus-Sherrill, S. A., & Yahner, J. (2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Prisoner Justice Quarterly, 28(5), 698–718. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.535553
  • Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Western, B. (2007). The prison boom and the decline of American citizenship. Society, 44(5), 30–36. doi:10.1007/s12115-007-9000-5
  • White, W. (2000). The history of recovered people as wounded healers: The era of professionalization and specialization. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 18(2), 1–25. doi:10.1300/J020v18n02_01
  • Williams, K. (2007). Employing ex-formerly incarcerated persons: Shifting the evaluation of workplace risks and opportunities from employees to corrections. UCLA Law Review, 55(2), 521–558.
  • Wright, J., & Cullen, F. (2004). Employment, peers, and life-curse transitions. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 183–205. doi:10.1080/07418820400095781

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.