543
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Came for the horses, stayed for the men”: A mixed methods analysis of staff, community, and reentrant perceptions of a prison-equine program (PEP)

, , , &

References

  • Arditti, J. A. (2003). Saturday morning at the jail: Implications of incarceration for families and children. Family Relations, 52, 195–204.
  • Arditti, J., Molloy, S., Spiers, S., & Johnson, E. (2018). Perceptions of nonresident father involvement among low-income youth and their single parents. Family Relations, 68(1), 68–84.
  • Arditti, J., Morgan, A. A., Spiers, S., Buechner-Maxwell, V., & Shivy, V. (2020). Perceptions of rehabilitative change among incarcerated persons enrolled in a Prison-Equine Program (PEP). Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, 8.
  • Bachi, K. (2014). An equine-facilitated prison-based program: Human-horse relations and effects on inmate emotions and behaviors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York, New York, NY.
  • Bachi, K. (2013). Equine-facilitated prison-based programs within the context of prison based animal programs: State of the science review. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52(1), 46–74. doi:10.1080/10509674.2012.734371
  • Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 26–44. doi:10.1177/104973299129121677
  • Berman, A. (2004). The reasoning and rehabilitation program: Assessing short—and long-term outcomes among male Swedish prisoners. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40(1–2), 85–103. doi:10.1300/J076v40n01_05
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Chen, M. E., Anderson, J. A., & Watkins, L. (2016). Parent perceptions of connectedness in a full service community school project. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 2268–2278. doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0398-5
  • Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
  • Cushing, J. L., Williams, J. D., & Kronick, R. F. (1995). The Wild Mustang program: A case study in facilitated inmate therapy. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22(3–4), 95–112. doi:10.1300/J076v22n03_08
  • Davis, L., Bozick, R., Steele, J., Saunders, J., & Miles, J. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  • Deaton, C. (2005). Humanizing prisons with animals: A closer look at “cell dogs” and horse programs in correctional institutions. Journal of Correctional Education, 56(1), 46–62.
  • Dolbin-MacNab, M. L., Parra-Cardona, J. R., & Gale, J. (2014). Mixed methods clinical research with couples and families. In R. B. Miller & L. N. Johnson (Eds.), Advanced methods in family therapy research: A focus on validity and change (pp. 266–281). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Durose, M., Cooper, A., & Snyder, H. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  • Esperian, J. (2010). The effect of prison education programs on recidivism. Journal of Correctional Education, 61(4), 316–334.
  • Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London, UK: Sage Publishing.
  • Furst, G. (2006). Prison-based animal programs: A national survey. The Prison Journal, 86(4), 407–430. doi:10.1177/0032885506293242
  • Gideon, L., Shoham, E., & Weisburd, D. L. (2010). Changing prison into a therapeutic milieu: Evidence from the Israeli national rehabilitation center for prisoners. The Prison Journal, 90(2), 179–202. doi:10.1177/0032885510361828
  • Gray, B., & Wood, D. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3–22. doi:10.1177/0021886391271001
  • Greenfield, E. A. (2012). Using ecological frameworks to advance a field of research, practice, and policy on aging-in-place initiatives. The Gerontologist, 52(1), 1–12. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr108
  • Hobbs, B. B., & Ford, D. R. (2009). Head Start/public school teams: Collaborating for successful transitions. NHSA Research Quarterly, 1, 25–44. doi:10.1207/s19309325nhsa0101_3
  • Hughes, T., & Wilson, D. J. (2005). Reentry trends in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/reentry/reentry.htm.
  • Jasperson, R. A. (2010). Animal-assisted therapy with female inmates with mental illness: A case example from a pilot program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(6), 417–433. doi:10.1080/10509674.2010.499056
  • Kim, S. W. (2018). Parental involvement in developing countries: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 149–156. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.07.006
  • Link, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Struening, E., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1989). A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 400–423. doi:10.2307/2095613
  • Moore, K., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J. (2013). Jail inmates’ perceived and anticipated stigma: Implications for post-release functioning. Self and Identity, 12(5), 527–547. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.702425
  • Nowell, L., Norris, J., White, D., & Moules, N. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384–160940691773313. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847
  • Pope, C., Lovell, R., & Brandl, S. (2001). Introductions: Foundations of criminal justice research. In C. Pope, R. Lovell, S. Brandl (Eds.), Voices from the field: Readings in criminal justice research (pp. 1–16). Belmont, CA: Wads-worth.
  • Travis, J. (2002). Invisible punishment: An instrument of social exclusion. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 15–36). New York, NY: The New Press.
  • Tyler, T. T., & Brockmann, B. (2017). Incarceration, reentry, stigma, and the perpetuation of racial and socioeconomic health inequity. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 45, 545–557. doi:10.1177/1073110517750595
  • Visher, C., Lattimore, P., Barrick, K., & Tueller, S. (2017). Evaluating the long-term effects of prisoner reentry services on recidivism: What types of services matter? Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 136–165. doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1115539
  • Western, B. (2018). Homeward: Life in the year after prison. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Wright, K. A., Pratt, T. C., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2012). The importance of ecological context for correctional rehabilitation programs: Understanding the micro- and macro- level dimensions of successful offender treatment. Justice Quarterly, 29(6), 775–798. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.583933
  • Young, M. C., Gartner, J., O’Connor, T., Larson, D., & Wright, K. N. (1995). Long-term recidivism among federal inmates trained as volunteer prison ministers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22(1–2), 97–118. doi:10.1300/J076v22n01_07
  • Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. (2011). An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(4), 345–357. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.04.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.