Reentry support in Victoria, Australia: managing risk, or fostering agency?

References

• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557675
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2007). The trajectory of the morphogenetic approach: An account in the first-person. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 54, 35–47. https://sociologiapp.iscte-iul.pt/pdfs/54/550.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, R., & Maruna, S. (2006). The kindness of prisoners: Strengths-based resettlement in theory and in action. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806060668
   Google Scholar
• Cannonier, C., Galloway Burke, M., & Mitchell, E. (2021). The impact of a reentry and aftercare program on recidivism. The Review of Black Political Economy, 48(1), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034644620973931
   Google Scholar
• Carlton, B., & Segrave, M. (2016). Rethinking women’s post-release reintegration and ‘success’. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865815573876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cording, J. R., Beggs Christofferson, S. M., & Grace, R. C. (2016). Challenges for the theory and application of dynamic risk factors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1111367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrections Victoria. (2019). Corrections, prisons and parole - transitional programs. Corrections Victoria. www.corrections.vic.gov.au/release/transitional-programs
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A., & Haynes, S. H. (2021). Imprisonment pains, reentry strains, and perceived likelihood of reoffending. Criminal Justice Studies, 34(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2020.1771332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark, B. (2019). Applied interdisciplinary research: A critical realist perspective. Journal of Critical Realism, 18(4), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2019.1644983
   Google Scholar
• Drawbridge, D. C., Truong, D., Nguyen, N. T., Lorenti, V. L., & Vincent, G. M. (2021). Risk–need–responsivity: Evaluating need‐to‐service matching with reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 39(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franich, G., Sandy, L., & Stone, U. (2021). ‘It’s not designed for women at all’: Exploring service providers’ perspectives of working in the Victorian criminal justice system. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 33(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1837713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, M. (2020). Second chances in the second city: Public housing and prisoner reentry in Chicago. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(4), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820918274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, B. A., Lanza, A. S., Lawlor, M., Dyson, W., & Gordon, D. M. (2016). A strengths-based approach to prisoner reentry: The Fresh Start Prisoner Reentry Program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(11), 1298–1314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15576501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, D. F. (2015). Defining post-release ‘success’: Using assemblage and phenomenography to reveal difference and complexity in post-prison conceptions. Critical Criminology, 23(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-014-9262-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, D. F. (2017). Being and becoming an ex-prisoner. Routlage.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K. (2021). “The conflict of risk”: Exploring support provided by NGO workers to people who were incarcerated in Victoria, Australia [Unpublished honours thesis]. RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., & Bachman, R. (2021). Self-identity and persistent offending: A quantitative test of identity theory of desistance. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 60(5), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2021.1931623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, K. (2020). Intermediary workers: Narratives of supervision and support work within the halfway house setting. Probation Journal, 67(4), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550520962191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. (2006). A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806060666
   Google Scholar
• Mowen, T. J., Boman, J. H., & Schweitzer, K. (2020). Strain and depression following release from prison: The moderating role of social support mechanisms on substance use. Deviant Behavior, 41(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1595372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, E., & Kirkwood, S. (2021). Co-authoring desistance narratives: Analysing interactions in groupwork for addressing sexual offending. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 21(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819863101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhan, J., Bowen, K., & Polzer, K. (2017). The reentry labyrinth: The anatomy of a reentry services network. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2016.1257533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the ‘feared self’: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20685067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presser, L., & Sandberg, S. (2015). Research strategies for narrative criminology. In W. R. Palacios & J. Miller (Eds.), Qualitative research in criminology: Advances in criminological theory (pp. 85–99). Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127880-6
   Google Scholar
• Quirouette, M. (2022). ‘The struggle is real’: Punitive assessment in community services. Punishment & Society, 24(3), 433–456. 53 https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474521990436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1998). Governing risky individuals: The role of psychiatry in new regimes of control. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 5(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719809524933
   Google Scholar
• Stone, U., Liddell, M., & Martinovic, M. (2017). Incarcerated mothers: Issues and barriers for regaining custody of children. The Prison Journal, 97(3), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517703957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett, A. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19(1–2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.19.1-2.75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner, V. (1995). Liminality and communitas. In V. Turner & R. D. Abrahams (Eds.), The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure (pp. 94–130). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134666
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, N., Heffernan, R., & Fortune, C.-A. (2020). Reorienting locus of control in individuals who have offended through strengths-based interventions: Personal agency and the good lives model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.553240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevelde, S., Vander Laenen, F., Van Damme, L., Vanderplasschen, W., Audenaert, K., Broekaert, E., & Vander Beken, T. (2017). Dilemmas in applying strengths-based approaches in working with offenders with mental illness: A critical multidisciplinary review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villeneuve, M., F.‐Dufour, I., & Farrall, S. (2021). Assisted desistance in formal settings: A scoping review. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 60(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12396
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., & La Vigne, N. (2020). Returning home: A pathbreaking study of prisoner reentry and its challenges. In P. K. Lattimore, B. M. Huebner, & F. S. Taxman (Eds.), Handbook on moving corrections and sentencing forward: Building on the record (pp. 278–311). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008941
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The Good Lives Model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001662744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: The risk paradigm. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, B., & McNeill, F. (2015). Lifelines: Desistance, social relations, and reciprocity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. (2018). Why call someone by what we don’t want them to be? The ethics of labelling in forensic/correctional psychology. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(7), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. (1999). The exclusive society: Social exclusion, crime and difference in late modernity. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv, R. (2019). The evidence-based approach to correctional rehabilitation: Current status of the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation. In P. Ugwudike, H. Graham, F. McNeill, P. Raynor, F. S. Taxman, C. Trotter (Eds.) The Routledge companion to rehabilitative work in CriminalJustice (pp. 79–90). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102832
   Google Scholar