There is Something I Need to Tell You: Balancing Appropriateness and Efficiency in Modality Choice for Interpersonal Disclosures

References

• Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2008). How extraverted is [email protected]? Inferring personality from e-mail addresses. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1116–1122. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33–48. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., Kunkel, A., Ledbetter, A., & Lin, M.-C. (2007). Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 9, 735–752. doi:10.1177/1461444807080339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M.-C. (2004). Social interactions across media: Interpersonal communication on the internet, telephone and face-to-face. New Media Society, 6, 299–318. doi:10.1177/1461444804041438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazarova, N. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62, 815–832. doi:10.1111/j.14602466.2012.01664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64, 635–657. doi:10.1111/jcom.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, R. S., Brandau-Brown, F. E., & Ragsdale, J. D. (2014). A profile of those likely to reveal friends’ confidential secrets. Communication Studies, 65, 389–406. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.837082
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, M. (2008). Taking Goffman on a tour of Facebook: College students and the presentation of self in a mediated digital environment. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, J. M., & Pace, R. C. (2014). Dual-tasking effects on outcomes of mobile communication technologies. Communication Research Reports, 31, 221–231. doi:10.1080/08824096.2014.907149
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. S., Uang, S.-T., & Taha, L. H. (1995). Appropriateness of communications media use in organizations: Situation requirements and media characteristics. Behaviour & Information Technology, 14, 199–207. doi:10.1080/01449299508914633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873–893. doi:10.1111/jcom.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-W., & Heo, J. (2014). Visiting theories that predict college students’ self-disclosure on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 79–86. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney, T. (2005). Online self-disclosure in diaries and its implications for knowledge managers. In UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings (pp. 22–24). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Northumbria University.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, M., & Toma, C. L. (2014). Social sharing through interpersonal media: Patterns and effects on emotional well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 530–541. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2015). Self-disclosure characteristics and motivations in social media: Extending the functional model to multiple social network sites. Human Communication Research, 41, 480–500. doi:10.1111/hcre.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, S. (2013). Self-disclosure on Facebook: How much do we really reveal? Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 17, 00–00. Retrieved from http://www.citrenz.ac.nz/jacit/JACIT1701/2013Day_Facebook.html
   Google Scholar
• Derlega, V. J., & Chaikin, A. L. (1977). Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 102–115. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01885.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L. (2014). Breaking good and bad news: Face-implicating concerns as mediating the relationship between news valence and hesitation to share the news. Communication Studies, 65, 223–243. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.811431
   Google Scholar
• Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004). Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 41–60. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4801_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, J., & Veksler, A. E. (2016). Relational maintenance in the Digital Age: Implicit rules and multiple modalities. Communication Quarterly, 64, 119–144. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1103279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation Processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855–870. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 35–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, B., & Hyun, M. J. (2012). The influence of friends’ Instant Messenger status on individuals’ coping and support-seeking. Communication Studies, 63, 536–553. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.649443
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T. D., & Major, D. A. (2006). The effects of communication modality on performance and self-ratings of teamwork components. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 557–576. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00027.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, S. (1991). Adding audio and video to an office environment. In: J. M. Bowers, & S. D. Benford (Eds.), Studies in computer-supported collaborative work (pp. 49–62). North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. Retrieved from https://ve115.zimt.uni-siegen.de/ecscw.uni-siegen.de/1989/p121_gale.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Geary, C., Parker, W., Rogers, S., Haney, E., Njihia, C., Haile, A., & Walakira, E. (2014). Gender differences in HIV disclosure, stigma, and perceptions of health. AIDS Care, 26, 1419–1425. doi:10.1080/09540121.2014.921278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. J., & Horenstein, D. (1975). The communication of self-disclosure: Level versus valence. Human Communication Research, 1, 316–322. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00280.x
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. J., & Whiteneck, G. G. (1976). Toward a multidimensional approach to the study of self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 347–355.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2002). Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 38–51. doi:10.1037//1089-2699.6.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. A., Smock, A., & Carr, C. T. (2015). Face[book] management: Self-presentation of political views on social media. Communication Studies, 66, 549–568. doi:10.1080/10510974.2015.1018447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holladay, S. J., & Seipke, H. L. (2007). Communication between grandparents and grandchildren in geographically separated relationships. Communication Studies, 58, 281–297. doi:10.1080/10510970701518371
   Google Scholar
• Hovick, S. R., Meyers, R., & Timmerman, C. E. (2003). E‐mail communication in workplace romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 54, 468–482. doi:10.1080/10510970309363304
   Google Scholar
• Kayany, J. M., Wotring, C. E., & Forrest, E. J. (1996). Relational control and interactive media choice in technology-mediated communication situations. Human Communication Research, 22, 399–421. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., & Rice, R. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FTF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1183–1207. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00369.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. C., & Xia, W. (1997). Media appropriateness: Effects of experience on communication media choice. Decision Sciences, 28, 877–910. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzenny, F. (1978). A theory of electronic propinquity: Mediated communication in organizations. Communication Research, 5, 3–24. doi:10.1177/009365027800500101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M. (2009). Measuring online communication attitude: Instrument development and validation. Communication Monographs, 76, 463–486. doi:10.1080/03637750903300262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madell, D. E., & Muncer, S. J. (2007). Control over social interactions: An important reason for young people’s use of the Internet and mobile phones for communication? Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 10, 137–140. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9980
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 103–111. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., Watt, J., & Walther, J. B. (2006). The influence of synchrony and sensory modality on the person perception process in computer-mediated groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 00–00. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., Watt, J., & Walther, J. B. (2009). Computer mediated teamwork and the efficiency framework: Exploring the influence of synchrony and cues on media satisfaction and outcome success. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1108–1119. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., & Brunner, S. R. (2015). The outcomes of broadcasting self-disclosure using new communication technologies: Responses to disclosure vary across one’s social network. Communication Research, 1–29. doi:10.1177/0093650215598836
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness. Human Communication Research, 19, 451–484. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, T. M., Jenkins, D. D., Aguerrever, L. E., Kietlinski, R. L., & Prichard, E. A. (2015). College students’ perceptions of inappropriate and appropriate Facebook disclosures. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 20, 86–96.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: Personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K., & Burke, T. J. (2015). Complementary channel use and the role of social competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 37–51. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shcmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail. A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18, 487–523. doi:10.1177/009365091018004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN Model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger, & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and Grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504–525. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddicken, M. (2014). The “privacy paradox” in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 248–273. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J. C., & Isaacs, E. (1992). Why do users like video? Studies of multimedia-support collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1, 163–196. doi:10.1007/BF00752437
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. A., & Altman, I. (1987). Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. In: M. E. Roloff, & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research. Sage annual reviews of communication research (pp. 257–277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. A., & Belgrave, F. Z. (1986). The effects of perceived intimacy and valence on self-disclosure reciprocity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 247–255. doi:10.1177/0146167286122011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., Jowi, D., Schreier, H., & Bertelsen, D. (2011). Students’ perceptions of E-mail interaction during student-professor advising sessions: The pursuit of interpersonal goals. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 307–330. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cleemput, K. (2010). “I’ll see you on IM, text, or call you”: A social network approach of adolescents’ use of communication media. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 75–85. doi:10.1177/0270467610363143
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Sometimes less is more. In A. Kappas, & N. C. Kramer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the internet (pp. 17–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511977589.003
   Google Scholar
• Waters, S., & Ackerman, J. (2011). Exploring privacy management on Facebook: Motivations and perceived consequences of voluntary disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 101–115. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01559.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, D., Tamborini, R., & Bowman, N. D. (2007). The effects of avatars on impression formation in different contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, M. T. (2008). Revealing the “real” me, searching for the “actual” you: Presentations of self on an Internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707–1723. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woollaston, V. (2013). Gone but not forgotten: “Deleted” Snapchat photos are stored on your phone and can be easily downloaded, claims forensics firm. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2322661/Gone-forgotten-Deleted-Snapchat-photos-stored-phone-easily-downloaded-claims-forensics-firm.html
   Google Scholar