3,956
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

I Believe in a Thing Called Bot: Perceptions of the Humanness of “Chatbots”

References

  • Andrews, D. C., & Haworth, K. N. (2006). Online customer service chat: Usability and sociability issues. Journal of Internet Marketing, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.arraydev.com/commerce/jim/0203-01.htm
  • Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 71–81. doi:10.1007/S12369-008-0001-3
  • Bates, J. (1994). The role of emotion in believable agents. Communication of the ACM, 37(7), 122–125. doi:10.1145/176789.176803
  • Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167–175. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1
  • Brennan, S. E., & Ohaeri, J. O. (1994). Effects of message style on users’ attributions toward agents. In C. Plaisant (Ed.), Proceedings of the CHI’94 conference companion on human factors in computing systems (pp. 281–282). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Burgoon, J. K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129–142. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00603.x
  • Burgoon, J. K. (1983). Nonverbal violations of expectations. In J. M. Wiemann & R. R. Harrison (Eds.), Nonverbal interaction (pp. 11–77). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1-2, 30–48. doi:10.1177/0261927X93121003
  • Burgoon, J. K., & Jones, S. B. (1976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Human Communication Research, 2, 131–146. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00706.x
  • Candello, H., Pinhanez, C., & Figueriredo, F. (2017). Typefaces and the perception of humanness in natural language chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3476–3487). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Chatbot. (n.d.). Oxford english dictionaries. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/chatbot
  • Christian, B. (2012). The most human human: What artificial intelligence teaches us about being alive. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Cooper, A., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 7–14. doi:10.1080/01614576.1997.11074165
  • De Angeli, A., & Brahnam, S. (2008). I hate you!: Disinhibition with virtual partners. Interacting with Computers, 20, 302–310. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.02.004
  • DeMeur, V., Niewiadomski, R., & Pelachaud, C. (2011). How is believability of a virtual agent related to warmth, competence, personification, and embodiment? Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 20, 431–448. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00065
  • Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P., & Westerman, D. (2016). Initial interaction expectations with robots: Testing the human-to-human interaction script. Communication Studies, 67, 227–238. doi:10.1080/10510974.2015.1121899
  • Gockley, R., Bruce, A., Forlizzi, J., Michalowski, M., Mundell, A., Rosenthal, S., ... Wang, J. (2005, August). Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. (pp. 1338–1343). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
  • Guerrero, L. K., Anderson, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (2011). Close encounters: Communication in relationships (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2008). The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. Journal of Physical Agents, 2(2), 33–40. doi:10.14198/JoPha.2008.2.2.05
  • Hill, J., Ford, W. R., & Farreras, I. G. (2015). Real conversation with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human-human online conversation and human-chatbot conversations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 245–250. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.026
  • Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. Proceedings of the ACM CHI’92 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 119–125. doi:10.1145/142750.142769
  • Kelly, S., . E., & Westerman, D. K. (2016). New technologies and distributed learning systems. In P. L. Witt (Ed.), Handbooks of communication science 16: Communication and learning (455-479). Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
  • Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2011). Can your avatar improve your health? The impact of avatar attractiveness and avatar creation. Paper presented at the 61st Annual Conference of International Communication Association, Boston, MA.
  • Korzenny, F. (1978). A theory of electronic propinquity: Mediated communication in organizations. Communication Research, 5, 3–24. doi:10.1177/009365027800500101
  • Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 901–931. doi:10.1037/pspp0000048
  • Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321–341. doi:10.1080/10919399209540190
  • Lee, K. M., Park, N., & Song, H. (2005). Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Human Communication Research, 31, 538–563. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00882.x
  • Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S.-A., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 754–772. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x
  • Lortie, C. L., & Guitton, M. J. (2011). Judgment of the humanness of an interlocutor is in the eye of the beholder. PLOS One, 6(9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025085
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261–266. doi:10.1080/03637757409375845
  • McPherson, M. B., & Yuhua, J. L. (2007). Students’ reactions to teachers’ management of compulsive communicators. Communication Education, 56, 18–33. doi:10.1080/03634520601016178
  • Murgia, A., Janssens, D., Demeyer, S., & Vasilescu, B. (2016). Among the machines: Human-bot interaction on social Q&A websites. CHI’16 Extended Abstracts. doi:10.1145/2851581.2892311
  • Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81–103. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153
  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Robb, A. (2014, April 17). How capital letters became internet code for yelling: And why we should lay off the all-caps key. New Republic. Retrieved from https://newrepublic.com/article/117390/netiquette-capitalization-how-caps-became-code-yelling
  • Salem, M., Eyssel, F., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S., & Joublin, F. (2013). To err is human(-like): Effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 313–323. doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0196-9
  • Shah, H., Warwick, K., Vallverdu, J., & Wu, D. (2016). An machines talk?: Comparison of Eliza with modern dialogue systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 278–295. doi:10.1016/j.chb.01.004
  • Simeon, D., Guralnik, O., Hazlett, E. A., Spigel-Cohen, J., Hollander, E., & Buchsbaum, M. S. (2000). Feeling unreal: A PET study of depersonalization disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1782–1788. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1782
  • Snow, J. (2018, February 27). Amazon is trying to make Alexa more chatty—But it’s very, very difficult. MIT Technology Review, Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/the-download/610381/amazon-is-trying-to-make-alexa-more-chatty-but-its-very-very-difficult/
  • Spence, P. R., Westerman, D., Edwards, C., & Edwards, A. (2014). Welcoming our robot overlords: Initial expectations about interaction with a robot. Communication Research Reports, 31, 272–280. doi:10.1080/08824096.2014.924337
  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073.
  • Tubbs, K. (1992). A vision of perfection. Quality, 31(4), 50–51.
  • Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 49, 433–460. doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
  • Vlahos, J. (2018, February 27). Inside the Alexa prize. Wired, Retrieved from htpps://www.wired.com/story/inside-amazon-alexa-prize
  • Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003
  • Walther, J. B., & Bazarova, N. N. (2008). Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Communication Research, 35, 622–645. doi:10.1177/0093650208321783
  • Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
  • Westerman, D., Edwards, A., & Edwards, C. (2018, May). Social robots and social presence: Interpersonally communicating with robots. Paper presented at the Human-Machine Communication Preconference at the International Communication Association Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Zhang, L., Erickson, L. B., & Webb, H. C. (2011, June). Effects of “emotional text” on online customer service chat. Paper presented at the 16th Graduate Students Research Conference in Hospitality and Tourism, Amherst, MA. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/gradconf_hospitality/2011/Presentation/42/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.