Mediation or Moderation? Examining How Politically Like-Minded and Dissimilar Conversations Influence the Relationship Between Social Media Political Information Consumption and Political Participation

References

• Aiello, L. M., Barrat, A., Schifanella, R., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., & Menczer, F. (2012). prediction and homophily in social media. ACM Transactions on the Web, 6(2), 1–33. doi:10.1145/2180861.2180866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & Schaffner, B. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22, 285–303. doi:10.1093/pan/mpt025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundidge, J., Garrett, R. K., Rojas, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2014). Political participation and ideological news online: “Differential gains” and “differential losses” in a presidential election cycle. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 464–486. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.821492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., Pfau, M., & Birk, T. S. (1995). An inoculation theory explanation for the effects of corporate issue/advocacy advertising campaigns. Communication Research, 22, 485–505. doi:10.1177/009365095022004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. (2016). Differential use, differential effects: Investigating the roles of different modes of news use in promoting political participation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 21, 436–450. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. Paper presented at the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Menlo Park, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 21–62. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’lima, G. M., Pearson, M. R., & Kelley, M. L. (2012). Protective behavioral strategies as a mediator and moderator of the relationship between self-regulation and alcohol-related consequences in first-year college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 330–337. doi:10.1037/a0026942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2016). The political environment on social media. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Shah, D. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24, 101–117. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113–134. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Barnidge, M., & Diehl, T. (2018). Political persuasion on social media: A moderated moderation model of political discussion disagreement and civil reasoning. The Information Society, 34, 302–315. doi:10.1080/01972243.2018.1497743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 105–123. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, B. W., & Scheufele, D. A. (2005). Examining differential gains from Internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions. Journal of Communication, 55, 71–84. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02659.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heatherly, K. A., Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2016). Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444816634677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 377–386. doi:10.1177/0270467610385893
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement. Political Psychology, 25, 65–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2018). Influence of discussion incivility on deliberation: An examination of the mediating role of moral indignation. Communication Research, 45, 213–240. doi:10.1177/0093650215616861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazersfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Chen, H. T. (2016). Social media and online political participation: The mediating role of exposure to cross-cutting and like-minded perspectives. Telematics & Informatics, 33, 320–330. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Heatherly, A., & Lee, J. K. (2016). Cross-cutting exposure on social networking sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 74–81. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Zubric, J., Keum, H., Deshpande, S., Cho, J., Stein, S., & Heather, M. (2001, August). Reflecting and connecting: Testing a communication mediation model of civic participation. Paper presented to the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855. doi:10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 422–442. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quality, 41, 673–690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obar, J. A., Zube, P., & Lampe, C. (2012). Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 1–25. doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.2.2012.0001
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Social networking sites and politics. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/03/12/social-networking-sites-and-politics/
   Google Scholar
• Ran, W., Yamamoto, M., & Xu, S. (2016). Media multitasking during political news consumption: A relationship with factual and subjective political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 352–359. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M. C., & Whiteley, P. (2007). Does mode matter for modeling political choice? Evidence from the 2005 British election study. Political Analysis, 15, 257–285. doi:10.1093/pan/mpl010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implication for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29, 46–65. doi:10.1177/009365020202900103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, J. W., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565. doi:10.1177/0093650205279209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2017). Blind spots of liberal righteousness. Retrieved from https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1044-blind-spots-of-liberal-righteousness
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556–576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2018). # Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73, 156–170. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versey, H. S., & Kaplan, G. A. (2012). Mediation and moderation of the association between cynical hostility and systolic blood pressure in low-income women. Health Education & Behavior, 39, 219–228. doi:10.1177/1090198111414884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 363–379. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar