Polarizing Organizations and Image Repair: The Effects of Extreme Disposition and Ego-Involvement on ELM Processing Routes for Organizational Responses

References

• Apsler, R., & Sears, D. O. (1968). Warning, personal involvement, and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 162–166. doi:10.1037/h0021248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Areni, C. S., & Lutz, R. J. (1988). The role of argument quality in the elaboration likelihood model. Advances in Consumer Research, 15(1), 197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Balzer, W. K., & Sulsky, L. M. (1992). Halo and performance appraisal research: A critical examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(6), 975–985. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.6.975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belichick, B. (2015, 24 January). Deflategate: The full transcript of Bill Belichick’s press conference defending the New England patriots. Mass Live. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150127233426/http://blog.masslive.com/patriots/2015/01/post_19.html
   Google Scholar
• Belichick, B., & Keteyian, A. (2008, May 16). Eye to eye: Bill Belichick. CBS News. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20200214205702/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyg9BhqEU
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2000). Another visit to the theory of image restoration strategies. Communication Quarterly, 48(1), 40–43. doi:10.1080/01463370009385578
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., & Lindsey, J. J. (1987). Argument strategies: Antidote to Tylenol’s poisoned image. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 23, 136–146. doi:10.1080/00028533.1987.11951338
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. The Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 69–81. doi:10.1177/002224298304700308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 805–818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantril, H. (1946). The intensity of an attitude. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(2), 129–135. doi:10.1037/h0061991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M. Y., Sia, C. L., & Kuan, K. K. (2012). Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(8), 618–635. doi:10.17705/1jais.00305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, W. J., & Winterich, K. P. (2013). Can brands move in from the outside? How moral identity enhances out-group brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 96–111. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 279–295. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0804_04
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2001). An extended examination of the crisis situations: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(4), 321–340. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1304_03
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 165–186. doi:10.1177/089331802237233
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2005). Exploratory study of stakeholder emotions: Affect and crises. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Härtel (Eds.), Research on emotion in organizations: Volume 1: The effect of affect in organizational settings (pp. 271–288). New York, NY: Emerald Group. doi:10.1016/S1746-9791(05)01111-9
   Google Scholar
• Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2000). Religious symbols as peripheral cues in advertising: A replication of the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 63–68. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00076-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 168–180. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373. doi:10.1086/209515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35(7), 603–618. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.7.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1981). Self and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 201–236). Waltham, MA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60176-0
   Google Scholar
• Hajjat, M. (2003). Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase intentions: The moderating role of cause involvement and donation size. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 93–109. doi:10.1300/J054v11n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K. (2000). Inactive publics: The forgotten publics in public relations. Public Relations Review, 26(4), 499–515. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00061-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A., Hunter, J. E., & Boster, F. J. (1993). The elaboration likelihood model as a theory of attitude formation: A mathematical analysis. Communication Theory, 3(1), 50–65. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00056_3_1.x|
   Google Scholar
• Hass, R. G. (1981). Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 141–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781315803012
   Google Scholar
• Heesacker, M., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, T. J. (1983). Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. Journal of Personality, 51(4), 653–666. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00872.x|
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, M. J., & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. In S. C. Jain (Ed.), Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions (pp. 184–187)). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. doi:10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insko, C. A., Lind, E. A., & LaTour, S. (1976). Persuasion, recall, and thoughts. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 7(1), 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. (2016, February 5). Americans evenly divided on super bowl; Brady a lightning rod. Public Policy Polling. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20200214205927/https://boston.cbslocal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3859903/2016/02/publicpolicypolling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 290–314. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. H., & Scileppi, J. A. (1969). Effects of ego-involvement conditions on attitude change to high and low credibility communicators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(1), 31–36. doi:10.1037/h0027992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, C. A., Collins, B. E., & Miller, N. (1969). Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• LaPierre, W. (1999, May 5). Wayne LaPierre address to members from the NRA annual meeting of members. National Rifle Association. http://web.archive.org/web/20000312035941/http://nrahq.com/transcripts/denver_wlp.shtml
   Google Scholar
• LaPierre, W. (2012, December 21). Remarks from the NRA press conference on Sandy Hook school shooting, delivered on December 21, 2012 (Transcript). The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/remarks-from-the-nra-press-conference-on-sandy-hook-school-shooting-delivered-on-dec-21-2012-transcript/2012/12/21/bd1841fe-4b88-11e2-a6a6-aabac85e8036_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Logiurato, B. (2013, January 16). In just one month, the NRA has torpedoed its reputation. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20130117162201/http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-approval-ratings-press-conference-gun-control-video-games-media-2013-1
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 5(4), 375–382. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00651.x
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N. (1965). Involvement and dogmatism as inhibitors of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1(2), 121–132. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(65)90040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, B., & Kwon, W. S. (2013). A model of antecedents of consumers’ post brand attitude upon exposure to a cause–brand alliance. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(2), 73–89. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1439
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250–256. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (1968). A cognitive model of attitudinal involvement. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 373–383). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915–1926. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: Application to advertising. Advertising and Consumer Psychology, 1, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847–855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kasmer, J. A. (1988). The role of affect in the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 117–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146. doi:10.1086/208954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., & Wan, H. H. (2006). Persuasion: An intrinsic function of public relations. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 101–136). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rhine, R. J., & Severance, L. J. (1970). Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 175–190. doi:10.1037/h0029832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, L. (2005, April 15). NRA viewed favorably by most Americans. Gallup. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20121224023632/http://www.gallup.com/poll/15868/nra-viewed-favorably-most-americans.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. W., Kelly, M., Rodgers, H. L., Jr, Sarup, G., & Tittler, B. I. (1973). Personal involvement, social judgment, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(3), 311–328. doi:10.1037/h0034948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1967). Attitudes as the individual’s own categories: The social judgment-involvement approach to attitude and attitude change. In C. W. Sherif & M. Sherif (Eds.), Attitude, ego-involvement, and change (pp. 105–139). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Siero, F. W., & Doosje, B. J. (1993). Attitude change following persuasive communication: Integrating social judgment theory and the elaboration likelihood model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(5), 541–554. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420230510|
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivacek, J., & Crano, W. D. (1982). Vested interest as a moderator of attitude–behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 210–221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 974–991. doi:10.1177/107769909607300415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M. T., Benoit, W. L., & Tschida, D. A. (2001). Testing the mediating role of cognitive responses in the elaboration likelihood model. Communication Studies, 52(4), 324–337. doi:10.1080/10510970109388567
   Google Scholar
• Stiff, J. B. (1986). Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta‐analytic review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes. Communications Monographs, 53(1), 75–89. doi:10.1080/03637758609376128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiff, J. B., & Boster, F. J. (1987). Cognitive processing: Additional thoughts and a reply to Petty, Kasmer, Haugtvedt, and Cacioppo. Communication Monographs, 54(3), 250–256. doi:10.1080/03637758709390230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. W. (1999). Heuristic-systematic information processing and risk judgment. Risk Analysis, 19(3), 391–400. doi:10.1023/A:1007092410720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartick, S. L. (1992). The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation. Business & Society, 31(1), 33–49. doi:10.1177/000765039203100104
   Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352. doi:10.1086/208520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar