Diversity, Disagreement, and Expression across Liberal, Conservative, and Mixed Groups

References

• Borah, P., Edgerly, S., Vraga, E. K., & Shah, D. V. (2013). Hearing and talking to the other side: Antecedents of cross-cutting exposure in adolescents. Mass Communication and Society, 16(3), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.693568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 155–159.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 21–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000029
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro‐and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1086/297808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale: Individual differences in the effect of the climate of opinion on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., Shanahan, J., & Glynn, C. J. (2001). Willingness to express one’s opinion in a realistic situation as a function of perceived support for that opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, M. V., Ritchie, M., & Anderson, M. R. (2011). Personality and political discussion. Political Behavior, 33(4), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9147-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D., & Carmichael, J. T. (2002). The political sociology of the death penalty: A pooled time-series analysis. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. (2012). Does discussion with disagreement discourage all types of political participation? Survey evidence from Hong Kong. Communication Research, 39(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211398356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 211–242). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., Knoll, J., & von Sikorski, C. (2017). The “spiral of silence” revisited: A meta-analysis on the relationship between perceptions of opinion support and political opinion expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217745429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., Morrison, K. R., & Schemer, C. (2010). A spiral of silence for some: Attitude certainty and the expression of political minority opinions. Communication Research, 37(6), 774–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T. (2002). The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. In M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in micropolitics: Political decisionmaking, deliberation and participation (pp. 151–193). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401000223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle‐Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, C. (2019). (Not) talking politics: Motivations and strategies for avoiding the expression of political opinions. Western Journal of Communication, 83(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1597157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scacco, J. M., & Peacock, C. (2014). The cross-pressured citizen in the 2012 presidential campaign: Formative factors and media choice behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(9), 1214–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213506217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel‐Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sifianou, M. (2012). Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1554–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J., & Muhlberger, P. (2009). Agreement and disagreement in group deliberation: Effects on deliberation satisfaction, future engagement, and decision legitimacy. Political Communication, 26(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902850775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treier, S., & Hillygus, D. S. (2009). The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022087617514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. (2016). Party differences in political content on social media. Online Information Review, 40(5), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2015-0345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar