894
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Engaging in Political Talk on Facebook: Investigating the Role of Interpersonal Goals and Cognitive Engagement

&

References

  • Banwart, M. (2007, November). The political interpersonal communication index: Developing a measure for understanding why we talk politics [Paper presentation]. National Communication Association Convention, Chicago, IL.
  • Bernstein, M. S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., & Karrer, B. (2013, May). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks [Paper presentation]. The ACM conference on human factors in computing system Paris, France.
  • Bode, L. (2016). Pruning the news feed: Unfriending and unfollowing political content on social media. Research and Politics, 3(3), 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016661873
  • Bode, L. (2017). Gateway political behaviors: The frequency and consequences of low-cost political engagement on social media. Social Media + Society, 3(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117743349
  • Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication, & Society, 18(5), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
  • Chen, H.-T. (2018). Spiral of silence on social media and the moderating role of disagreement and publicness in the network: Analyzing expressive and withdrawal behaviors. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3917–3936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818763384
  • Chen, M. K., & Rhola, R. (2018). The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties. Science, 360(10), 1020–1024. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1433
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., Lomax Cook, F., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
  • Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390247
  • Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
  • Eveland, W. P., Jr., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1082–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01598.x
  • Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083
  • Hampton, K. N., Shin, I., & Lu, W. (2017). Social media and political discussion: When online presence silences offline conversation. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 1090–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1218526
  • Hayes, R. A., Smock, A., & Carr, C. T. (2015). Face[book] management: Self-presentation of political views on social media. Communication Studies, 66(5), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1018447
  • Heger, K., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2019). Feminism! What is it good for? The role of feminism and political self-efficacy in women’s online political participation. Social Science Computer Review, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865909
  • Hopmann, D. N. (2012). The consequences of political disagreement in interpersonal communication: New insights from a comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 51(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02001.x
  • Hopmann, D. N., Bjarnøe, C., & Wonneberger, A. (2020). Responding to interpersonal political disagreement. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 32(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz011
  • Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge University Press.
  • Jang, S. M., Lee, H., & Park, Y. J. (2014). The more friends, the less political talk? Predictors of Facebook discussions among college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(5), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0477
  • Kearney, M. W. (2017). Interpersonal goals and political uses of Facebook. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1250069
  • Koc-Michalska, K., Schiffrin, A., Lopez, A., Boulianne, S., & Bimber, B. (2019). From online political posting to Mansplaining: The gender gap and social media in political discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319870259
  • Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., Weeks, B. E., & Kwak, N. (2017). From online disagreement to offline action: How diverse motivations for using social media can increase political information sharing and catalyze offline political participation. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117716274
  • Levinsen, K., & Yndigegn, C. (2015). Political discussions with family and friends: Exploring the impact of political distance. The Sociological Review, 63(2_suppl), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12263
  • Lyons, J., & Sokhey, A. (2014). Emotion, motivation, and social information seeking about politics. Political Communication, 31(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.828138
  • Macafee, T. (2013). Some of these things are not like the others: Examining motivations and political predispositions among political Facebook activity. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2766–2775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.019
  • Mascheroni, G., & Murru, M. F. (2017). “I can share politics but I don’t discuss it”: Everyday practices of political talk on Facebook. Social Media + Society, 3(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117747849
  • McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 732–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00213.x
  • Moffett, K. W., & Rice, L. L. (2017). College students and online political expression during the 2016 election. Social Science Computer Review, 36(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317721186
  • More now say it’s ‘stressful’ to discuss politics with people they disagree with. (2018, November). Pew Research Center. https://web.archive.org/web/20181105214022/https://www.people-press.org/2018/11/05/more-now-say-its-stressful-to-discuss-politics-with-people-they-disagree-with
  • Morey, A. C., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Hutchens, M. J. (2012). The “who” matters: Types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. Political Communication, 29(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.641070
  • Morey, A. C., & Yamamoto, M. (2020). Exploring political discussion motivations: Relationships with different forms of political talk. Communication Studies, 71(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1692885
  • Moy, P., & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: the impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23(4), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600977003
  • Mutz, D., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401000223
  • Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x
  • O’Sullivan, P. B., & Carr, C. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104
  • Parks, M. R. (2010, June). Who are Facebook friends? Exploring the composition of Facebook friend networks [Paper presentation]. The annual conference of the International Communication Association, Singapore.
  • Partisan antipathy: More intense, more personal. (2019, October). Pew Research Center. https://web.archive.org/web/20191010181142/https://www.people-press.org/2019/10/10/partisan-antipathy-more-intense-more-personal
  • Pennington, N. (2016). Living social: Comparing social media use in your 20s and 30s. In P. G. Nixon, R. Rawal, & A. Funk (Eds.), Digital media usage across the life course (pp. 96-106). Ashgate Publishing.
  • Pennington, N. (2020). An examination of relational maintenance and dissolution through social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106196
  • Pennington, N., Winfrey, K. L., Warner, B. R., & Kearney, M. W. (2015). Liking Obama and Romney (on Facebook): An experimental evaluation of political engagement and efficacy during the 2012 general election. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.032
  • Perrin, A., & Anderson, M. (2019, April 10). Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. Pew Research Center.https://web.archive.org/web/20190410161344/https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018>
  • Public highly critical of state of political discourse. (2019, June). Pew Research Center. https://web.archive.org/web/20190619172832/https://www.people-press.org/2019/06/19/public-highly-critical-of-state-of-political-discourse-in-the-u-s
  • Song, H., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Dynamic spirals put to test: An agent-basedmodel of reinforcing spirals between selective exposure, interpersonal networks,and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 256–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12288
  • Song, H., & Eveland, W. P. (2015). The structure of communication networks matters: How network diversity, centrality, and context influence political ambivalence, participation, and knowledge. Political Communication, 32(1), 83–108. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.882462
  • Thompson, C. G., Kim, R. S., Aloe, A. M., & Becker, B. J. (2017). Extracting the variance inflation factor and other multicollinearity diagnostics from typical regression results. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973555.2016.1277529
  • Van Duyn, E., Peacock, C., & Stroud, N. J. (2019). The gender gap in online news comment sections. Social Science Computer Review, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864876
  • Velasquez, A., & Rojas, H. (2017). Political expression on social media: The role of communication competence and expected outcomes. Social Media + Society, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117696521
  • Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025
  • Wells, C., Cramer, K. J., Wagner, M. W., Alvarez, G., Friedland, L. A., Shah, D. V., … Franklin, C. (2017). When we stop talking politics: The maintenance and closing of conversation in contentious times. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12280
  • Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public spaces. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02834.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.