References
- Amason, A. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/256633
- Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599
- Beck, S. J., Bourdeaux, R., DiTunnariello, N. and Paskewitz, E. A. (2016). A review and technological consideration of the bona fide group perspective. Small Group Research, 47(6), 665–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416665703
- Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001
- Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/3069319
- Choi, J. N., & Sy, T. (2010). Group‐level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 1032–1054. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.661
- Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
- Connaughton, S. L., & Shuffler, M. (2007). Multinational and multicultural distributed teams: A review and future agenda. Small Group Research, 38(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407301970
- Daniel, S., Agarwal, R. and Stewart, K. J. (2013). The effects of diversity in global, distributed collectives: A study of open source project success. Information Systems Research, 24(2) 312–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0435
- de Vreede, G. J., Antunes, P., Vassileva, J., Gerosa, M. A., & Wu, K. (2016). Collaboration technology in teams and organizations: Introduction to the special issue. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9632-3
- Dissanayake, I., Zhang, J., & Gu, B. (2015). Virtual team performance in crowdsourcing contest: A social network perspective. In The Proceedings of 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA, (pp. 4894–4897). IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.580
- Dissanayake, I., Zhang, J., Yasar, M., & Nerur, S. P. (2017). Strategic effort allocation in online innovation tournaments. Information & Management, 55(3), 396–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.09.006
- Duhaime, E. P., Olson, G. M., & Malone, T. W. (2015). Broad participation in collective problem solving can influence participants and lead to better solutions: Evidence from the MIT climate CoLab. MIT CCI Working Paper, No. 2015-001. MIT.
- Eisenberg, J., Post, C., & DiTomaso, N. (2019). Team dispersion and performance: The role of team communication and transformational leadership. Small Group Research, 50(3), 348–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419827376
- Erickson, L. B., Petrick, I., & Trauth, E. M. (2012, August 9–12). Hanging with the right crowd: Matching crowdsourcing need to crowd characteristics. In The Proceedings of the 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, Washington. AMCIS (Americas Conference on Information Systems).
- Estellés-Arolas, E., & Gonzalez-ladron-de-guerva, F. (2012). Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information Science, 38(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512437638
- Finch, W. H., Bolin, J. E., & Kelley, K. (2019). Multilevel modeling using R. CRC Press.
- Fuger, S., Schimpf, R., Füller, J., & Hutter, K. (2017). User roles and team structures in a crowdsourcing community for international development–a social network perspective. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 438–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353947
- Gibbs, K. D., Han, A., and Lun, J. (2019). Demographic diversity in teams: the challenges, benefits, and management strategies. In Strategies for Team Science Success (pp. 197-205). Springer.
- Guth, K. L., & Brabham, D. C. (2017). Finding the diamond in the rough: Exploring communication and platform in crowdsourcing performance. Communication Monographs, 84(4), 510–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1359748
- Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
- Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/256901
- Hentschel, T., Shemla, M., Wegge, J., & Kearney, E. (2013). Perceived diversity and team functioning: The role of diversity beliefs and affect. Small Group Research, 44(1), 33–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412470725
- Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587
- Huang, Y., Shen, C., & Contractor, N. S. (2013). Distance matters: Exploring proximity and homophily in virtual world networks. Decision Support Systems, 55(4), 969–977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.01.006
- Khasraghi, J. H., & Hirschheim, R. (2021). Collaboration in crowdsourcing contests: How different levels of collaboration affect team performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1887354
- Kramer, M. W. (2002). Communication in a community theater group: Managing multiple group roles. Communication Studies, 53(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970209388582
- Lakhani, K. R., Fayard, A., Levina, N., & Pokrywa, S. H. (2013). Openideo. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/product/openideo/612066-PDF-ENG
- Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645–659. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17843943
- Lavy, S., Bareli, Y., & Ein-Dor, T. (2015). The effects of attachment heterogeneity and team cohesion on team functioning. Small Group Research, 46(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414553854
- Madsen, T., Woolley, J., & Sarangee, K. (2012). Using Internet-based collaboration technologies for Innovation: Crowdsourcing vs. expert sourcing. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2012(1), 14965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2012.14965abstract
- Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2013). Toward an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004
- Majchrzak, A., More, P. H., & Faraj, S. (2012). Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organization Science, 23(4), 951–970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0677
- Masum, H., Schroeder, K., Khan, M., & Daar, A. S. (2013). Open source biotechnology platforms for global health and development: Two case studies. In M. Smith, and K. M. Reilly (Eds.), Open development: Networked innovations in international development, Chapter 5, 113-128. MIT Press .
- Mello, A. L., & Rentsch, J. R. (2015). Cognitive diversity in teams: A multidisciplinary review. Small Group Research, 46(6), 623–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415602558
- Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface‐and deep‐level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 1015–1039. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.293
- O’Leary, M. B., & Mortensen, M. (2010). Go (con) figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0434
- Page, S. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press.
- Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029
- Peña, J., Walther, J. B., & Hancock, J. T. (2007). Effects of geographic distribution on dominance perceptions in computer-mediated groups. Communication Research, 34(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207300431
- Propp, K. M., & Kreps, G. L. (1994). A rose by any other name: The vitality of group communication research. Communication Studies, 45(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979409368405
- Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41(3), 248–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979009368307
- Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (2012). Bona fide groups. Communication and group decision making. In A. Hollingshead & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams: A guide to approaches, tools, and technologies (pp. 147–178). Routledge.
- Ren, Y., Chen, J., & Riedl, J. (2016). The impact and evolution of group diversity in online open collaboration. Management Science, 62(6), 1668–1686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2178
- Rokicki, M., Zerr, S., & Siersdorfer, S. (2015, May). Groupsourcing: Team competition designs for crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, Florence, Italy, (pp. 906–915). ACM.
- Salazar, M. R., Feitosa, J., & Salas, E. (2017). Diversity and team creativity: Exploring underlying mechanisms. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 21(4), 187–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000073
- Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 779–802. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.220
- Shaw, A., & Hill, B. M. (2014). Laboratories of oligarchy? How the iron law extends to peer production. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12082
- Shen, C., & Monge, P. (2011). Who connects with whom? A social network analysis of an online open source software community. First Monday, 16(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i6.3551
- Sundic, M., & Leitner, K. (2013). Crowdsourcing as an innovation strategy: A study on innovation platforms in Austria and Switzerland. Communications & Strategies, 89(1), 55–72. https://ideas.repec.org/a/idt/journl/cs8903.html
- Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
- Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G., Austin, and S., Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-37). Brooks/Cole. 56(65), 9780203505984-16.
- Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
- Teachman, J. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity measures of qualitative variation. Sociological Methods & Research, 8(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418000800305
- Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
- Wang, L. S., Chen, J., Ren, Y., & Riedl, J. (2012). Searching for the Goldilocks zone: Trade-offs in managing online volunteer groups. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, ACM (pp. 989–998). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145351
- Wang, R., & Cheliotis, G. (2016). Institutional and entrepreneurial engagement in commons- based peer production. International Journal of Communication, 10, 22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4248
- Wang, R. (2020). Marginality and team building in collaborative crowdsourcing. Online Information Review, 44(4), 827–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2018-0269
- Yuan, Y. C., & Gay, G. (2006). Homophily of network ties and bonding and bridging social capital in computer-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 11(4), 1062–1084. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00308.x
- Zimmermann, A. (2011). Interpersonal relationships in transnational, virtual teams: Towards a configurational perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00284.x