Interdisciplinary Collaborations in Academia: Modeling the Roles of Perceived Contextual Norms and Motivation to Collaborate

References

• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Atouba, Y., & Shumate, M. (2010). Interorganizational networking patterns among development organizations. Journal of Communication, 60(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2008). Becoming friends by chance. Psychological Science, 19(5), 439–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair, M., & Mader, C. E. (2013). Academic writing at the graduate level: Improving the curriculum through faculty collaboration. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 10(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.10.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., DiazGranados, D., Salazar, M., Kramer, W. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1974). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, Q., Curran, M., & Brint, S. (2020). Interdisciplinary cluster hiring initiatives in U.S. research universities: More straw than bricks? The Journal of Higher Education, 91(5), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1688615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J. (2012). Error of measurement in longitudinal designs: Defining, identifying, and correcting for specific error and transient error 1. Communication Research Reports, 29(3), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.684809
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, C. S., Hill, T. D., Burdette, A. M., Mossakowski, K. N., & Johnson, R. J. (2020). Religious attendance and social support: Integration or selection? Review of Religious Research, 62(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-019-00392-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communications Monographs, 55(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2017). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. Social Capital, 31–56. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129457-2
   Google Scholar
• Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H. (1991). Explication. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, A., & Rimal, R. N. (2016). Social norms: A review. Review of Communication Research, 4, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703. 21318925. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, S. M., & Hesse, C. (2022). Relational communication as a partnership-building tool for environmental nonprofits. Communication Studies, 73(4), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2022.2112249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. A. (1985). The logic of causal order. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986212
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups; a study of human factors in housing. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., McAllum, K., & Ginoux, L. (2023). Team care for the care team: A scoping review of the relational dimensions of collaboration in healthcare contexts. In Health communication. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2198673
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J. S., & Cooper, K. R. (2022). Multiple identities in Faith-based Organizations: Exploring status and value homophily in idealized partnerships. Communication Research, 49(5), 733–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211046246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, D. C., Filo, K., Beaton, A. A., & Pritchard, M. (2009). Measuring the motives of sport event attendance: Bridging the academic- practitioner divide to understanding behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 18(3), 126–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, M. K., & Papa, M. J. (2000). The mud, the blood, and the beer guys: Organizational osmosis in blue-collar work groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880009365554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., & Dulaimi, M. (2006). The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative behaviour in construction firms. Construction Innovation, 6(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170610710712
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. (2016). Grand challenges in U.S. science policy attempt policy innovation. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 11(1/2/3), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2016.078379
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J. R., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Harking, sharking, and tharking: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. Journal of Management, 43(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 267–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Hamilton, M. A. (1995). PATH: A least squares static path analysis program [Computer software]. Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Isbell, M. G. (2012). The role of boundary spanners as the interorganizational link in nonprofit collaborating. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911423641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, D. M., & Totzkay, D. (2019). We do publish (conceptual) replications (sometimes): Publication trends in communication science, 2007–2016. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1632218
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Leahey, E. (2016). From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L., Isbell, M. G., & Koschmann, M. (2010). Collaborative tensions: Practitioners’ experiences of interorganizational relationships. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 460–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.523605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M., Ross, S., & Holden, T. (2012). The how and why of academic collaboration: Disciplinary differences and policy implications. Higher Education, 64(5), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9521-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506068174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Z., Linabary, J. R., Buzzanell, P. M., Mouton, A., & Rao, R. L. (2020). Enacting everyday feminist collaborations: Reflexive becoming, proactive improvisation and co-learning partnerships. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeng, H., Jang, H. Y., & Li, J. (2016). A critical review of the motivational factors for festival attendance based on meta-analysis. Tourism Management Perspectives, 17, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manata, B. (2016). Exploring the association between relationship conflict and group performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice, 20(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manata, B. (2019). The structural effects of team density and normative standards on team member performance. Human Communication Research, 45(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manata, B. (2023). Relational balance in the workplace: Exploring the moderating role of organizational commitment. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(3), 572–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221137579
   Google Scholar
• Manata, B., & Bozeman, J. (2022). Documenting the longitudinal relationship between group conflict and group cohesion. Communication Studies, 73(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2022.2058576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manata, B., Garcia, A. J., Mollaoglu, S., & Miller, V. D. (2021). The effect of commitment differentiation on integrated project delivery team dynamics: The critical roles of goal alignment, communication behaviors, and decision quality. International Journal of Project Management, 39(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manata, B., Miller, V. D., DeAngelis, B. N., & Paik, J. E. (2016). Newcomer socialization research: The importance and application of multilevel theory and communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 307–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735264
   Google Scholar
• Martono, S., Khoiruddin, M., Wijayanto, A., Ridloah, S., Wulansari, N. A., & Udin, U. (2020). Increasing teamwork, organizational commitment and effectiveness through the implementation of collaborative resolution. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics & Business, 7(6), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masi, R. J., & Cooke, R. A. (2000). Effects of transformational leadership on subordinate motivation, empowering norms, and organizational productivity. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 8(1), 16–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028909
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., Carpenter, C. J., & Westerman, D. (2018). On replication in communication science. Communication Studies, 69(3), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1464938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K., Scott, C. R., Stage, C., & Birkholt, M. (1995). Communication and coordination in an interorganizational system: Service provision for the urban homeless. Communication Research, 22(6), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365095022006006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounce, M. (2010). Working together: Academic librarians and faculty collaborating to improve students’ information literacy skills: A literature review 2000-2009. The Reference Librarian, 51(4), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2010.501420
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. (2018). Networks. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nistor, N., & Fischer, F. (2012). Communities of practice in academia: Testing a quantitative model. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 1(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., & Smith, S. W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilny, A., & Proulx, J. D. (2022). Using interorganizational communication networks to predict terrorist attacks. Communication Research, 49(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219848271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science & Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Richter, A. W., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2011). The effectiveness of teams in organizations: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(13), 2749–2769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.573971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2015). A re-explication of social norms: Ten years later. Communication Theory, 25(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205275385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y., Jorgensen, T. D., Rockwood, N., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V., Markle, E., Hallquist, M., Rhemtulla, M., Katsikatsou, M., Barendse, M., Scharf, F., & Du, H. (2023). Package ‘Lavaan’ [Computer Software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lavaan/lavaan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rubinger, L., Gazendam, A., Ekhtiari, S., Nucci, N., Payne, A., Johal, H., Khanduja, V., & Bhandari, M. (2020). Maximizing virtual meetings and conferences: A review of best practices. International Orthopaedics, 44(8), 1461–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04615-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398105
   Google Scholar
• Schmutz, J. B., Meier, L. L., & Manser, T. (2019). How effective is teamwork really? The relationship between teamwork and performance in healthcare teams: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal Open, 9(9), e028280. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., & Knobloch, L. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(6), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, P., van der Berg, S., Frössman, T., & Wohlers, U. (2019). DOSBox [Computer software]. www.dosbox.com
   Google Scholar
• Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2000). Survey research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 223–252). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. (2018). Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching, 51(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 286–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000299894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar