References
- Alaoui, F. Z. C. (2023). You know it’s different in the game man”: Technodesiring, technorelating, and technoBlackness as analytical modes of queer worldmaking in black Mirror’s, “striking vipers. Journal of Homosexuality, 70(1), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2022.2103876
- Alcoff, L., & Potter, E. (1993). Introduction: When feminisms intersect epistemology. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
- Apprich, C., Chun, W. H. K., Cramer, F., & Steyerl, H. (2019). Pattern discrimination. University of Minnesota Press.
- Arya, A., De, S., Mishra, D., Shekhawat, G., Sharma, A., Panda, A., Lalani, F., Singh, P., Mothilal, R. K., Grover, R., Nishal, S., Dash, S., Shora, S., Akbar, S. Z., & Pal, J. (2022). Dismiss: Database of Indian social media influencers on twitter. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (Vol. 16., pp. 1201–1207). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19370
- Ayyar, V., & Khandare, L. (2013). Mapping color and caste discrimination in Indian society. In R. E. Hall (Ed.), The melanin millennium: Skin color as 21st century international discourse (pp. 71–95). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4608-4_5
- Bailey, M. (2021). Misogynoir transformed. In Misogynoir transformed. New York University Press.
- Baishya, A. K., Mini, D. S., & Soundararajan, T. (2023). The anti-caste alter-network: Equality labs and anti-caste activism in the US. Communication, Culture and Critique, 16(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcad011
- Banaji, S. (2018). Vigilante publics: Orientalism, modernity and Hindutva fascism in India. Javnost - the Public, 25(4), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1463349
- Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.
- Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity.
- Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2013). The social structure of political echo chambers: Ideology and political homophily in online communication networks. Working paper. University of Berkeley.
- Burgess, J., & Bruns, A. (2015). Easy data, hard data: The politics and pragmatics of Twitter research after the computational turn. In compromised data: From social media to big data (pp. 93–111). Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
- Christin, A. (2020). Algorithmic ethnography, during and after COVID-19. Communication and the Public, 5(3–4), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320959850
- Clifford, J. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.
- Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
- Dasgupta, R. K., & DasGupta, D. (Eds.). (2018). Queering digital India: Activisms, identities, subjectivities. Edinburgh University Press.
- D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT Press.
- Elish, M. C., & Boyd, D. (2018). Situating methods in the magic of big data and AI. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1375130
- Florini, S.(2019). Beyond hashtags: Racial politics and black digital networks. NYU Press.
- Gajjala, R. (2019). Digital diasporas: Labor and affect in gendered Indian digital publics. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Gajjala, R., Edwards, E. L., Rahut, D., Faniyi, O. M., Jha, B., Jain, J., Jain, J., Khan, A., & Farooq, S.(2023). Transnationalising Dadis as feminist political/activist subjects. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 7(1), 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/12886
- Gajjala, R., Ford, S., Kumar, V., & Subramanian, S. (2021). Online (Indian/South Asian) digital protest publics negotiating #POC, #BIPOC, and #anticaste. In S. MacDonald, B. Wiens, M. MacArthur, & M. Radzikowska (Eds.), Networked feminisms: Activist assemblies and digital practices (pp. 145–161). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Gajjala, R., & Vanniyar, G. (2019). Dialogue interlude: The digital queer question. In R. Gajjala (Ed.), Digital diasporas: Labor and affect in gendered Indian digital publics (pp. 151–166). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Hillis, K., Paasonen, S., & Petit, M. (2015). Networked affect. MIT Press.
- Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Welles, B. F. (2020). # HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. MIT Press.
- Khokhar, D. (2015). Gephi cookbook. Packt Publishing.
- McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis: A beginner’s guide. Sage.
- Mirzoeff, N. (1999). An introduction to visual culture. Psychology Press.
- Mishra, N. (2015). India and colorism: The finer nuances. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 14(4), 725–750.
- Mudambi, A. (2023). South Asian Americans and anti-black racism: Critically reflexive racialization as an anti-racist vernacular discourse. Communication, Culture and Critique, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcac045
- Nagar, I. (2019). Being Janana: Language and sexuality in contemporary India. Taylor & Francis.
- Nakamura, L. (2008). Digitizing race: Visual cultures of the Internet. University of Minnesota Press.
- Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001
- Ophir, Y., Walter, D., & Marchant, E. R. (2020). A collaborative way of knowing: Bridging computational communication research and grounded theory ethnography. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa013
- Paik, S. (2014). Building bridges: Articulating dalit and African American women’s solidarity. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 42(3/4), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2014.0053
- Parameswaran, R. (2011). E-race-ing color: Gender and transnational visual economies of beauty in India. In R. S. Hegde (Ed.), Circuits of visibility (pp. 68–88). New York University Press.
- Parameswaran, R., & Cardoza, K. (2009). Melanin on the margins: Advertising and the cultural politics of fair/light/white beauty in India. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 11(3), 213–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/152263790901100302
- Phillips, D. J., & O’Riordan, K. (2007). Queer online: Media technology & sexuality. Peter Lang.
- Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.
- Rath, S., & Rehman, B. H. H. (2022, September 13). Success story of Dabur: An Indian born multinational company. StartupTalky. https://startuptalky.com/dabur-success-story/
- Rouvroy, A. (2016). “Of data and men”: Fundamental rights and liberties in a world of big data: Vol. T-PD-BUR(2015)09REV. Council of Europe. http://www.crid.be/pdf/public/8137.pdf
- Roy, S. (2022). Changing the subject: Feminist and queer politics in neoliberal India. Duke University Press.
- Sharma, B. (2020, December 18). One year after Mass protests, India’s muslims still live in fear. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/18/one-year-mass-caa-protests-india-muslims-citizenship-amendment-act-modi/
- Staff, O. (2021, October 25). Dabur apologises for lesbian Karwa Chauth ad: Read full statement. OpIndia. https://www.opindia.com/2021/10/dabur-apologises-for-lesbian-karwa-chauth-ad-withdraws-read-full-statement/
- Tseng, Y.-S. (2022). Algorithmic empowerment: A comparative ethnography of two open-source algorithmic platforms – decide Madrid and vTaiwan. Big Data & Society, 9(2), 20539517221123505. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221123505