Basic Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling in Criminal Justice and Criminology Research

References

• Arbuckle , J. L. 2009 . AMOS , Chicago, IL : SPSS .
   Google Scholar
• Bentler , P. M. 1990 . Comparative fit indexes in structural models . Psychological Bulletin , 107 (2) : 238 – 246 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler , P. M. 2006 . EQS 6.1 structural equations program , Encino, CA : Multivariate Software .
   Google Scholar
• Bentler , P. M. and Bonett , D. G. 1980 . Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures . Psychological Bulletin , 88 (3) : 588 – 606 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen , K. A. 1989 . Structural equations with latent variables , New York, NY : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Cheung , G. W. and Rensvold , R. B. 2002 . Evaluating goodness‐of‐fit indexes for testing measurement invariance . Structural Equation Modeling , 9 (2) : 233 – 255 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina , J. M. 1993 . What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications . Journal of Applied Psychology , 78 (1) : 98 – 104 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan , X. , Thompson , B. and Wang , L. 1999 . Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes . Structural Equation Modeling , 6 (1) : 56 – 83 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoelter , J. W. 1983 . The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness‐of‐fit indices . Sociological Methods and Research , 11 (3) : 325 – 344 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1995 . “ Evaluating model fit ” . In Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications , Edited by: Hoyle , R. H. 76 – 99 . Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1998 . Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparamterized model misspecification . Psychological Methods , 3 (4) : 424 – 453 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu , L. and Bentler , P. M. 1999 . Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives . Structural Equation Modeling , 6 (1) : 1 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog , K. G. and Sörbom , D. 1981 . LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood , Chicago, IL : National Educational Resources .
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog , K. G. and Sörbom , D. 1984 . LISREL VI user's guide , (3rd ed.) , Mooresville, IN : Scientific Software .
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog , K. G. and Sörbom , D. 2006 . LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software] , Lincolnwood, IL : Scientific Software International .
   Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. and Hau , K. 1996 . Assessing goodness of fit: Is parsimony always desirable? . Journal of Experimental Education , 64 (4) : 364 – 391 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulaik , S. A. , James , L. R. , Van Alstine , J. , Bennett , N. , Lind , S. and Stilwell , C. D. 1989 . Evaluation of goodness‐of‐fit indices for structural equation models . Psychological Bulletin , 105 (3) : 430 – 445 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén , B. O. and Muthén , L. K. 2007 . Mplus , Los Angeles, CA : Muthén & Muthén .
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt , N. 1996 . Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha . Psychological Assessment , 8 (4) : 350 – 353 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , D. A. and Patterson , E. B. 1985 . Latent‐variable models in criminological research: Applications and a generalization of Joreskog's LISREL model . Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 1 (2) : 127 – 158 .
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton , B. , Muthén , B. , Alwin , D. F. and Summers , G. F. 1977 . Assessing reliability and stability in panel models . Sociological Methodology , 8 : 84 – 136 .
   Google Scholar