Cracking Open the Black Box of the Manuscript Review Process: A Look Inside Justice Quarterly

References

• Bakanic , V. , McPhail , C. and Simon , R. J. 1987 . The manuscript review and decision-making process . American Sociological Review , 52 : 631 – 642 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakanic , V. , McPhail , C. and Simon , R. J. 1989 . Mixed messages: Referees’ comments on the manuscripts they review . Sociological Quarterly , 30 : 639 – 654 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann , L. , Mutz , R. and Daniel , H.-D. 2010 . A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: A multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and it’s determinants . PLoS ONE , 5 ( 12 ) : 1 – 10 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein , R. J. 1991 . Manuscript review in psychology: Psychometrics, demand characteristics and an alternative model . Journal of Mind and Behavior , 12 : 429 – 468 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubin , D. and Hackett , E. 1990 . Peerless science , Albany , NY : Suny Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti , D. V. 1991 . The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation . Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 14 : 119 – 186 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberley, S. 1987. Social and cognitive dimensions of manuscript review: An integrated model of publication outcome (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University).
   Google Scholar
• Eberley , W. and Warner , W. K. 1990 . Fields or subfields of knowledge: Rejection rates and agreement in peer review . The American Sociologist , 21 : 217 – 231 .
   Google Scholar
• Fabianic , D. 1980 . Perceived scholarship and readership of criminal justice journals . Journal of Police Science and Administration , 8 : 15 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox , M. F. 1989 . Disciplinary fragmentation, peer review, and the publication process . The American Sociologist , 20 : 188 – 191 .
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland , S. W. and Cortina , J. M. 1997 . Reviewer and editor decision making in the journal review process . Personnel Psychology , 49 : 427 – 452 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargens , L. L. 1988 . Scholarly consensus and journal rejections rates . American Sociological Review , 53 : 139 – 151 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargens , L. L. and Herting , J. R. 1990a . A new approach to referees’ assessments of manuscripts . Social Science Research , 19 : 1 – 16 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargens , L. L. and Herting , J. R. 1990b . Neglected considerations in the analysis of agreement among journal referees . Scientometrics , 19 : 91 – 106 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , D. M. and Roen , D. H. 1992 . Complimenting and involvement in peer review: Gender variation . Language in Society , 21 : 27 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey , D. 1988 . Assessing precision in the manuscript review process: A little better than chance . Scientometrics , 14 : 75 – 82 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey , D. 1991 . Precision in the manuscript review process: Hargens and Herting revisited . Scientometrics , 22 : 313 – 325 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartney , J. Verification and imagination: Qualities reviewers seek in sociological papers . Paper presented at the American Sociological Association annual meeting . Boston , MA .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , J. and Perrucci , R. 2001 . Back stage at social problems: An analysis of the editorial decision process, 1993-1996 . Social Problems , 48 : 93 – 110 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustaine , E. E. and Tewksbury , R. 2008 . Reviewers’ views on reviewing: An examination of the peer review process in criminal justice . Journal of Criminal Justice Education , 19 : 351 – 365 .
   Google Scholar
• Neuman , W. R. , Davidson , R. , Joo , S.-H. , Park , Y. J. and Williams , A. E. 2008 . The seven deadly sins of communication research . Journal of Communication , 58 : 220 – 237 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton , D. P. 2010 . Quality and peer review of research: An adjudicating role for editors . Accountability in Research , 18 : 130 – 145 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regoli , R. M. , Poole , E. D. and Miracle , A. W. 1982 . Assessing the prestige of journals in criminal justice: A research note . Journal of Criminal Justice , 10 : 57 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shichor , D. , O’Brien , R. M. and Decker , D. L. 1983 . Periodical prestige in criminology and criminal justice . Criminology , 21 : 457 – 461 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson , J. R. 2009 . An assessment of the relative impact of criminal justice and criminology journals . Journal of Criminal Justice , 37 : 505 – 511 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson , J. , Snell , C. and Rodriguez , J. J. 2006 . An assessment of criminal justice and criminology journal prestige . Journal of Criminal Justice Education , 17 : 297 – 322 .
   Google Scholar
• Stack , W. 1987 . Measuring the relative impacts of criminology and criminal justice journals: A research note . Justice Quarterly , 4 : 475 – 484 .
   Google Scholar
• Vecchio , R. P. 2006 . Journal reviewer ratings: Issues of particularistic bias, agreement, and predictive validity within the manuscript review process . Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society , 26 : 228 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Wearden , S. T. and Endres , F. F. 1991 . Standards and perceived roles of JMC journal reviewers . Journalism Quarterly , 68 : 499 – 508 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , F. P. III , McShane , M. D. and Wagoner , C. P. 1995 . Differences in assessments of relative journal prestige and utility of criminal justice and criminology journals . American Journal of Criminal Justice , 19 : 215 – 238 .
   Google Scholar
• Winkler , K. E. 1983 . Criminal justice/criminology journal rankings: ASC versus ACJS . Journal of Criminal Justice , 11 : 369 – 375 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar