Perceptions on the Trend of Multi-Authored Collaboration: Results from a National Survey of Criminal Justice and Criminology Faculty

References

• Barnett, A., Ault, R., & Kaserman, D. (1988). The rising incidence of co-authorship in economics: Further evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 539–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, E., & Farrington, D. (1994). Who are the most-cited scholars in major american criminology and criminal justice journals? Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 517–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, E., Farrington, D., & Sorensen, J. (2000). Journal publications of Phd graduates from American criminology and criminal justice programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 11, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web or internet based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 821–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Maio, G., & Kushner, H. (1981). Quantification and multiple authorships in political science. Journal of Polities, 43, 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and internet surveys. The total design methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Endersby, J. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 375–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., Cobane, C., Vander Ven, T., & Cullen, F. (1998). How many authors does it take to publish an article? Trends and patterns in political science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 31, 847–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., Vander Ven, T., Cobane, C., Cullen, F., & Williams, N. (1998). Trends in multiple authored articles in criminology and criminal justice: A comparative disciplinary analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 9, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, J., & Zaleski, P. (1991). Trends in economic journals literature. Atlantic Economic Journal, 19, 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 153–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Khey, D., Jennings, W., Higgins, G., Schoepfer, A., & Langton, L. (2011). Re-ranking the top female academic stars in criminology and criminal justice using an alternative method: A research note. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 118–129.
   Google Scholar
• Laband, D., & Tollison, R. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 632–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, H., Boggess, L., & Jennings, W. (2011). Re-assessing publication productivity among academic stars in criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 102–116.
   Google Scholar
• Melin, G. 2000. Pragmatism and self organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29: 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963-1999. American Sociological Review, 69, 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presser, S. (1980). Collaboration and the quality of research. Social Studies of Science, 10, 95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, S., Hickman, M., & Reynolds, P. (2011). A preliminary assessment of small world scholarship networks in criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sever, B. (2005). Ranking multiple authors in criminal justice scholarship: An examination of underlying issues. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16, 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K., & McMillan, S. (1999). Response variation in email surveys: An exploration. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shutt, J., & Barnes, J. (2008). Reexamining criminal justice star power in a larger sky: A belated response to Rice et al. on sociological influence in criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 213–226.
   Google Scholar
• Skolnik, M. 2000. Does counting publications provide any useful information about academic performance. Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring: 15-25.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, J., Snell, C., & Rodriguez, J. (2006). An assessment of criminal justice and criminology journal prestige. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17, 297–321.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, B., & Swartz, J. (2007). Assessing the quality of doctoral programs in criminology in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18, 53–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., DeMichele, M. T., & Miller, M. J. (2005). Methodological orientations of articles appearing in criminal justice’s top journals: Who publishes what and where. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16, 265–279.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. (2011). How many authors does it take to write an article? An assessment of criminology and criminal justice research article author composition. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, R. (2011). What makes them tick: Lessons on high productivity from leading twenty first century academic stars. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 130–149.
   Google Scholar