Does Discussion Promote Learning Outcomes? Analysis of an Online Criminology Class: Research Note

References

• Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan-C. Retrieved from http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending_In.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, K. M. (2010). Fluency, accuracy, and complexity in graded and ungraded writing. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 690–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burruss, G. W., & Furlow, M. H. (2007). Teaching statistics visually: A quasi experimental evaluation of teaching chi square through computer tutorials. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18, 209–230.
   Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. D., & Flower, S. M. (2002). Helping criminal justice students learn statistics: A quasi experimental evaluation of learning assistance. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13, 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Dabney, D. A., Green, L., & Topali, V. (2006). Freshman learning communities in criminology & criminal justice. An effective tool for enhancing student recruitment and learning outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17, 44–68.
   Google Scholar
• Forte, J. A., & Root, V. (2011). To ITV or not to ITV: A comparison of hybrid and web enhanced approaches to teaching a macro-course in human behavior in the social environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21, 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. A., Barnes, C. M., & Martin, K. J. (2009). Undergraduate research methods: Does size matter? A look at the attitudes and outcomes of students in a hybrid class format vs. a traditional class format. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20, 227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, J. L., Bjerregaard, B., & Lord, V. B. (2009). Identifying factors that influence the successful transition of criminal justice transfer students. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20, 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Hummer, D., Sims, B., Wooditch, A., & Salley, K. S. (2010). Considerations for faculty preparing to develop and teach online criminal justice courses at traditional institutions of higher learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 283–310.
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, M. E. (2006). Online vs. classroom based instruction: A comparative study of learning outcomes. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 11, 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., & White, J. T. (2002). The use of multiple intelligence in criminal justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13, 369–386.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, D. A., & Swatt, M. (2001). Mastery learning, rewriting assignments and student learning of criminal justice research methods. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 12, 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2004). Teaching online: A practical guide. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kunkel, K. R. (2003). Assessing computer technology in the criminal justice classroom: A case study. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14, 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, M. M. (2006). Academic integrity and distance education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17, 244–261.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Yu, C. S., & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information and Management, 40, 497–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. S., & Hanrahan, K. (2004). Criminology freshman: Preparation, expectations, and college performance. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 15, 287–310.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, D., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Factors affecting student performance and satisfaction: Online vs. traditional course delivery. Journal of Computer Information Systems, Winter, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, A. J., Mallory, S. L., & Campbell, J. (2001). The graduate record exam and undergraduate grade point averages in a criminal justice graduate program. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 12, 311–318.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons-Pollard, N., Lacks, T. R. D., & Grant, P. H. (2008). A comparative assessment of student learning outcomes in large online and traditional campus-based introduction to criminal justice courses. Criminal Justice Studies, 21, 239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, J. L. (2002). SPSS vs. Excel: Computing software, criminal justice students, and statistics. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13, 442–452.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, J. L. (2006). Academic achievement & statistical knowledge: A comparison of criminal justice and non criminal justice majors. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17, 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., & DeJong, C. (2005). Using GRE scores and prior GPA to predict academic performance among criminal justice graduate students. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16, 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sami, F. (2011). Course format effects on learning outcomes in an introductory statistics course. MathAMATYC Educator, 2, 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J., Grohe, B., & Pogue, B. (2008). The impact of criterion writing evaluation technology on criminal justice student writing skills. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 432–445.
   Google Scholar
• Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A Meta analytic approach. The International review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 4 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Shieh, R. S., Chang, W., & Liu, E. Z. F. (2011). Technology enabled active learning (TEAL) in introductory physics: Impact on genders and achievement levels. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 1082–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stack, S. (2005). The effect of extra credit papers on learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16, 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, S., & Kelley, T. (2002). The graduate record exam as a predictor of graduate student performance. The case of criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13, 335–350.
   Google Scholar
• Tibbetts, S. G. (2003). Freshman interest groups in criminal justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14, 213–228.
   Google Scholar